Workplace learning during the science doctorate: what influences research learning experiences and outcomes?

References

• Billett, S. (2001). Learning through work: Workplace affordances and individual engagement. Journal of Workplace Learning, 13, 209–214.10.1108/EUM0000000005548
   Google Scholar
• Billett, S. (2004). Workplace participatory practices: Conceptualising workplaces as learning environments. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16, 312–324.10.1108/13665620410550295
   Google Scholar
• Billett, S. (2006). Relational interdependence between social and individual agency in work and working life. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 13, 53–69.10.1207/s15327884mca1301_5
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. M., & Roth, W.-M. (2007). The practice of field ecology: Insights for science education. Research in Science Education, 37, 171–187.10.1007/s11165-006-9021-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang, K.-H. (2003). Learning experiences of doctoral students in UK universities. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 23, 4–32.
   Google Scholar
• Craswell, G. (2007). Deconstructing the skills training debate in doctoral education. Higher Education Research & Development, 26, 377–391.
   Google Scholar
• Cumming, J. (2009). The doctoral experience in science: Challenging the current orthodoxy. British Educational Research Journal, 35, 877–890.10.1080/01411920902834191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming, J., Kiley, M., Thomas, M., Hort, L., Pike, M., Evans, E., & Main, A. (2009). Research graduate skills project. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
   Google Scholar
• Delamont, S., & Atkinson, P. (2001). Doctoring uncertainty: Mastering craft knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 31, 87–107.10.1177/030631201031001005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. (2005). Using narrative in social research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Golde, C. M., & Dore, T. M. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of today’s doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. Philadelphia, PA: A report prepared for The Pew Charitable Trusts.
   Google Scholar
• Hakala, J. (2009). Socialization of junior researchers in new academic research environments: Two case studies from Finland. Studies in Higher Education, 34, 501–516.10.1080/03075070802597119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, T. (2002). A quantitative analysis of PhD students' views of supervision. Higher Education Research and Development, 21, 41–53.10.1080/07294360220124648
   Google Scholar
• Holley, K. (2009). Animal research practices and doctoral student identity development in a scientific community. Studies in Higher Education, 34, 577–591.10.1080/03075070802597176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, N. (2010a). A sociocultural view of doctoral students’ relationships and agency. Studies in Continuing Education, 32, 103–117.10.1080/0158037X.2010.487482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, N. (2010b). Doctoral experience and learning from a sociocultural perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 35, 829–843.10.1080/03075070903348412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, N. (2010c). Doctoral students as journal editors: Non-formal learning through academic work. Higher Education Research & Development, 29, 319–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, N., Alexander, P., Harris-Huemmert, S., McAlpine, L., & Wagstaff, S. (2011). The hidden realities of life as a doctoral student. In V. Kumar & A. Lee (Eds.), Doctoral education in international context: Connecting local, regional and global perspectives (pp. 212–231). Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, D., Metcalfe, J., & Evans, J. (2006). Review of literature on the impact of working context and support on the postgraduate research student learning experience. London: Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L., & Amundsen, C. (2011). Supporting the doctoral process: Research-based strategies for doctoral students, supervisors and administrators. Amsterdam: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L., & Amundsen, C. (2012). Challenging the taken-for-granted: How research analysis might inform pedagogical practices and institutional policies related to doctoral education. Studies in Higher Education, 37, 683–694.10.1080/03075079.2010.537747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyhältö, K., Stubb, J., & Lonka, K. (2009). Developing scholarly communities as learning environments for doctoral students. International Journal for Academic Development, 14, 221–232.10.1080/13601440903106551
   Google Scholar
• Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar