Experiencing doctoral liminality as a conceptual threshold and how supervisors can use it

References

• Ampaw, F. D., & Jaeger, A. J. (2012). Completing the three stages of doctoral education: An event history analysis. Research in Higher Education, 53, 640–660. doi:10.1007/s11162-011-9250-310.1007/s11162-011-9250-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amundsen, C., & McAlpine, L. (2009). ‘Learning supervision’: Trial by fire. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 331–342. doi:10.1080/1470329090306880510.1080/14703290903068805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Tennant, M. (2006). Putting doctoral education to work: Challenges to academic practice. Higher Education Research & Development, 25, 293–306. doi:10.1080/07294360600793093
   Google Scholar
• Chase, S. E. (2011). Narrative inquiry: Still a field in the making. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 421–434). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (2009). Asking questions, sharing stories and identity construction: Sociocultural issues in narrative research. In S. Trahar (Ed.), Narrative research on learning (pp. 27–46). Oxford: Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cousin, G. (2009). Researching learning in higher education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among the five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Espino, M. M., Munoz, S. M., & Marquez Kiyama, J. (2010). Transitioning from doctoral study to the academy: Theorizing trenzas of identity for Latina sister scholars. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 804–818. doi:10.1177/107780041038312310.1177/1077800410383123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haigh, C., Hardy P., & Duncan, F. (2011). Six stages of doctoral study: A new model for PhD students. Nurse Researcher, 18, 46–47. Retrieved from http://nurseresearcher.rcnpublishing.co.uk/news-and-opinion/opinion/six-stages-of-doctoral-study-a-new-model-for-phd-students
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herrmann, A. F. (2012). “I know I’m unlovable”: Desperation, dislocation, despair, and discourse on the academic job hunt. Qualitative Inquiry, 18, 247–255. doi:10.1177/107780041143156110.1177/1077800411431561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House, G. (2010). Postgraduate education in the United Kingdom (pp. 1–72). Higher Education Policy Institute and The British Library. Retrieved from http://www.hepi.ac.uk/455-1764/Postgraduate-education-in-the-UK.html
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, R., & Simpson, B. (2012). Writes of passage: Writing up qualitative data as a threshold concept in doctoral research. Teaching in Higher Education, 17, 735–746. doi:10.1080/13562517.2012.67832810.1080/13562517.2012.678328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janta, H., Lugosi, P., & Brown, L. (2012). Coping with loneliness: A netnographic study of doctoral students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 38, 553–571. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2012.726972
   Google Scholar
• Jazvac-Martek, M. (2009). Oscillating role identities: The academic experiences of education doctoral students. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 253–264. doi:10.1080/1470329090306886210.1080/14703290903068862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keefer, J. M. (2010, October). Public transformations: Adult learners who use social media to express and understand their identities as developing researchers. Presented at the Internet Research 11: The 11th annual conference of the Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR), Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Keefer, J. M. (2013, March 25). Navigating liminality: The experience of troublesome periods and distance during doctoral study (M. Tight). Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Keefer, J., & Parchoma, G. (2012, June). The experience of interdisciplinarity in doctoral research: Threshold journeys. Presented at the 4th Biennial Threshold Concepts Conference & National Academy’s 6th Annual Conference, Dublin, Ireland. Retrieved from http://www.nairtl.ie/documents/BookofAbstracts_ONLINE.pd
   Google Scholar
• Kiley, M. (2009). Identifying threshold concepts and proposing strategies to support doctoral candidates. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 293–304. doi: 10.1080/1470329090306900110.1080/14703290903069001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiley, M., & Wisker, G. (2009). Threshold concepts in research education and evidence of threshold crossing. Higher Education Research & Development, 28, 431–441. doi:10.1080/07294360903067930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land, R., Meyer, J. H. F., & Smith, J. (2008). Editor’s preface. In R. Land, J. H. F. Meyer, & J. Smith (Eds.), Threshold concepts within the disciplines (pp. ix–xxi). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A., & Boud, D. (2009). Framing doctoral education as practice. In D. Boud & A. Lee (Eds.), Changing practices of doctoral education (pp. 10–25). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L., & Amundsen, C. (2009). Identity and agency: Pleasures and collegiality among the challenges of the doctoral journey. Studies in Continuing Education, 31, 109–125. doi:10.1080/0158037090292737810.1080/01580370902927378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L., Jazvac-Martek, M., & Hopwood, N. (2009). Doctoral student experience in education: Activities and difficulties influencing identity development. International Journal for Researcher Development, 1, 97–109. doi:10.1108/1759751X20110000710.1108/1759751X201100007
   Google Scholar
• Mewburn, I. (2011). Troubling talk: Assembling the PhD candidate. Studies in Continuing Education, 33, 321–332. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2011.58515110.1080/0158037X.2011.585151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines. Enhancing teaching–learning environments in undergraduate courses project. Retrieved from http://www.etl.tla.ed.ac.uk/docs/ETLreport4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education, 49, 373–388. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-6779-510.1007/s10734-004-6779-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murakami-Ramalho, E., Militello, M., & Piert, J. (2013). A view from within: How doctoral students in educational administration develop research knowledge and identity. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 256–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parchoma, G., & Keefer J. M. (2012, April). Contested disciplinarity in international doctoral supervision. Presented at the 8th International Conference on Networked Learning, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Retrieved from http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fss/organisations/netlc/abstracts/parchoma_smposium.html
   Google Scholar
• Pilbeam, C., & Denyer, D. (2009). Lone scholar or community member? The role of student networks in doctoral education in a UK management school. Studies in Higher Education, 34, 301–318. doi:10.1080/0307507080259707710.1080/03075070802597077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pole, C. (2000). Technicians and scholars in pursuit of the PhD: Some reflections on doctoral study. Research Papers in Education, 15, 95–111. doi:10.1080/02671520036296110.1080/026715200362961
   Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne, D. E. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. E. (2012). Changes in doctoral education: Implications for supervisors in developing early career researchers. International Journal for Researcher Development, 3, 118–138. doi:10.1108/1759751131131697310.1108/17597511311316973
   Google Scholar
• Trafford, V. (2008). Conceptual frameworks as a threshold concept in doctorateness. In R. Land, J. H. F. Meyer, & J. Smith (Eds.), Threshold concepts within the disciplines (pp. 273–288). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Trafford, V., & Leshem, S. (2009). Doctorateness as a threshold concept. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 305–316. doi:10.1080/1470329090306902710.1080/14703290903069027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, V. (2011). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• van Gennep, A. (1960). The rites of passage. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wisker, G., & McAlpine, L. (2009). Embracing contraries in research on doctoral education: The richness of conceptual diversity. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 249–251. doi:10.1080/1470329090308310110.1080/14703290903083101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisker, G., Morris, C., Cheng, M., Masika, R., Warnes, M., Trafford, V., … Lilly, J. (2010). Doctoral learning journeys: Final report (pp. 1–61). London: Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/projects/detail/ntfs/ntfsproject_brighton
   Google Scholar
• Wisker, G., & Robinson, G. (2009). Encouraging postgraduate students of literature and art to cross conceptual thresholds. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 317–330. doi:10.1080/1470329090306903510.1080/14703290903069035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisker, G., & Savin-Baden, M. (2009). Priceless conceptual thresholds: Beyond the ‘stuck place’ in writing. London Review of Education, 7, 235–247. doi:10.1080/1474846090329020710.1080/14748460903290207
   Google Scholar