References
- Amundsen, C., & McAlpine, L. (2009). ‘Learning supervision’: Trial by fire. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 331–342.10.1080/14703290903068805
- Batchelor, D., & Di Napoli, R. (2006). The doctoral journey: Perspectives. Educate, 6, 13–24.
- Blass, E., Jasman, A., & Levy, R. (2012). Supervisor reflections on developing doctoralness in practice-based doctoral students. Quality Assurance in Education, 20, 31–41.10.1108/09684881211198220
- European University Association. 2007. Doctoral programmes in European universities: Achievements and challenges. ( Report prepared for European Universities and Ministers of Higher Education). Retrieved from www.eua.be/fileadmin/user_upload/files/Publications/Doctoral_Programmes_in_Europe_s_Universities.pdf
- Higher Education Support Act 2003 – Other Grants Guidelines (Research). 2012. Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved from http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2012L02010
- Holbrook, A., Bourke, S., & Cantwell, R. (2006). Using research candidate annual report data to examine supervision effectiveness. In M. Kiley & G. Mullins (Eds.), Quality in postgraduate research: Knowledge creation in testing times (pp. 83–98). Canberra: CEDAM, The Australian National University.
- Kehm, B. M. (2004). Developing doctoral degrees and qualifications in Europe: Good Practice and issues of concern – a comparative analysis. In J. Sadlak (Ed.), Doctoral studies and qualifications in Europe and the United States: Status and prospects (pp. 279–298). Bucharest: UNESCO-CEPES.
- Kolb, D. (1993). The process of experiential learning. In M. Thorpe, R. Edwards, & A. Hanson (Eds.), The culture and processes of adult learning (pp. 138–156). London: Routledge.
- Miller, N., & Brimicombe, A. (2003). Mapping research journeys across complex terrain with heavy baggage. Studies in Continuing Education, 26, 405–417.
- Nerad, M. (2006). Globalisation and its impact on research education: Trends and emerging best practices for the doctorate of the future. In M. Kiley & G. Mullins (Eds.), Quality in postgraduate research: knowledge creation in testing times (pp. 11–12). Canberra: CEDAM, The Australian National University.
- Peelo, M. (2011). Understanding supervision and the PhD. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
- Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. (2012). The UK quality code for higher education: Chapter B11: Research degrees. Retrieved from the Quality Assurance Agency website: http://www.qaa.ac.uk/Publications/InformationAndGuidance/Documents/B11.pdf
- Reissman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. London: Sage.
- Sadlak, J. (Ed.). (2004). Doctoral studies and qualifications in Europe and the United States: Status and prospects. Bucharest: UNESCO-CEPES.
- Sambrook, S., Stewart, J., & Roberts, C. (2008). Doctoral supervision … a view from above, below and the middle! Journal of Further and Higher Education, 32, 71–84.10.1080/03098770701781473
- Schön, D. A. (1991). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Aldershot: Ashgate.
- Shaw, K. (2009). Student experience of undergraduate research projects: A perspective on Honours in Australia (unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Newcastle, Australia.
- West, R. (1998). Learning for life final report: Review of higher education financing and policy. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs.