Enabling microblogging-based peer feedback in face-to-face classrooms

References

• Augustsson, G. (2010). Web 2.0, pedagogical support for reflexive and emotional social interaction among Swedish students. The Internet and Higher Education, 13, 197–205.10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S. M. (2008). How to give effective feedback to your students. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M., & Lam, J. (2011). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 395–407. doi:10.1080/0307507100364244910.1080/03075071003642449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanock, K. (2000). Comments on essays: Do students understand what tutors write? Teaching in Higher Education, 5, 95–105.10.1080/135625100114984
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H. (1996). Constructing self-explanations and scaffolded explanations in tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 33–49.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, C., Beham, G., Reinhardt, W., & Sillaots, M. (2008, September). Microblogging in technology enhanced learning: A use-case inspection of PPE summer school 2008. Paper presented at the Workshop on Social Information Retrieval for Technology Enhanced Learning, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Dippold, D. (2009). Peer feedback through Blogs: Student and teacher perceptions in an advanced German class. ReCALL, 21, 18–36. doi:10.1017/S095834400900010X10.1017/S095834400900010X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Toit, E. (2012). Constructive feedback as a learning tool to enhance students’ self-regulation and performance in higher education. Perspectives in Education, 30, 32–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, K. (2013). Providing constructive feedback to students during mentoring. Nursing Standard, 27, 50–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elavsky, C. M., Mislan, C., & Elavsky, S. (2011). When talking less is more: Exploring outcomes of Twitter usage in the large-lecture hall. Learning, Media and Technology, 36, 215–233. doi:10.1080/17439884.2010.54982810.1080/17439884.2010.549828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellery, K. (2007). Assessment for learning: A case study using feedback effectively in an essay-style test. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 421–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everhart, D. (2006). Evolving from course-centric to learning-centric: Portfolios, wikis, and social learning. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 32, 133–146.
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, R. M., Wager, W. W., & Briggs, L. J. (1992). Principles of instructional design (4th ed.). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, F., Luo, T., & Zhang, K. (2012). Tweeting for learning: A critical analysis of research on microblogging in education published in 2008–2011. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 783–801.10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01357.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Gropper, G. L. (1983). A metatheory of instruction: A framework for analyzing and evaluating instructional theories and models. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 37–53). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R., & Dalgleish, A. (1999). Undergraduates’ experiences of using the world wide web as an information resource. Innovations in Education and Training International, 36, 334–345.10.1080/1355800990360409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendry, G. D., Bromberger, N., & Armstrong, S. (2011). Constructive guidance and feedback for learning: The usefulness of exemplars, marking sheets and different types of feedback in a first year law subject. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hounsell, D. (2007). Towards more sustainable feedback to students. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education (pp. 101–113). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, S. J., Liu, E. F., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Web-based peer assessment: Feedback for students with various thinking-styles. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 420–432. doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00198.x10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00198.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., Lin, S. J., Chiu, C.-H., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Web-based peer review: The learner as both adapter and reviewer. IEEE Transactions on Education, 44, 246–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, T., & Gao, F. (2012). Enhancing classroom learning experience by providing structures to microblogging-based activities. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 11, 199–211.
   Google Scholar
• Merrill, M. D. (1983). Component display theory. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models (pp. 279–334). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). The nature of feedback: how different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instructional Science, 37, 375–401.10.1007/s11251-008-9053-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199–218.10.1080/03075070600572090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, C.-C. (2001). A review and discussion of epistemological commitments, metacognition, and critical thinking with suggestions on their enhancement in Internet-assisted chemistry classrooms. Journal of Chemical Education, 78, 970–974.10.1021/ed078p970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, S., & Tsai, C. (2007). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers & Education, 49, 1161–1174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ware, P., & O’Dowd, R. (2008). Peer feedback on language form in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 12, 43–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2008). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar