Predicting the creativity of design majors based on the interaction of diverse personality traits

References

• Anderson, C., Spataro, S. E., & Flynn, F. J. (2008). Personality and organizational culture as determinants of influence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 702–710.10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariani, D. W. (2013). Personality and learning motivation. European Journal of Business and Management, 5, 26–35.
   Google Scholar
• Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9–30.10.1111/ijsa.2001.9.issue-1&2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron, F. (1955). The disposition toward originality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 478–485.10.1037/h0048073
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 349–444). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Callaghan, E. (2008, April). Personalities of design thinking. International DMI Education Conference, ESSEC Business School, Cergy-Pointoise, France.
   Google Scholar
• Century, M. (2007, June). Exact imagination and distributed creativity: A lesson from the history of animation. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI conference on creativity & cognition (pp. 83–89). Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Charyton, C., Jagacinski, R. J., & Merrill, J. A. (2008). CEDA: A research instrument for creative engineering design assessment. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 147–154.10.1037/1931-3896.2.3.147
   Google Scholar
• Christiaans, H. H. C. M. (1992). Creativity in design: The role of domain knowledge in designing (pp. ix, xi, 1 and 2). Utrecht: Lemma.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression correlation analysis for the behavioral science (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2011). ‘Design’ in principle and practice: A reconsideration of the terms of design engagement. The Design Journal, 14, 45–63.10.2752/175630610X12877385838768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa Jr., P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: PAR.
   Google Scholar
• Crilly, N. (2010). The structure of design revolutions: Kuhnian paradigm shifts in creative problem solving. Design Issues, 26, 54–66.10.1162/desi.2010.26.1.54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bono, E. (2009). Lateral thinking: A textbook of creativity. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Durling, D. (2003, April). Horse or cart? Designer creativity and personality. Design self-understanding. The aesthetic of technology (pp. 1–11). 5th European Academy of Design Conference, Barcelona. Retrieved from http://www.ub.edu/5ead/PDF/7/Durling.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Felder, R. M., Felder, G. N., & Dietz, E. J. (2002). The effects of personality type on engineering student performance and attitudes. Journal of Engineering Education, 91, 3–17.10.1002/jee.2002.91.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 115–134.10.1037/0022-0167.51.1.115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26–42.10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., & Matthes, J. (2009). Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 924–936.10.3758/BRM.41.3.924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, T. J., Culley, S. J., & Dekoninck, E. (2008). Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Design Studies, 29, 160–180.10.1016/j.destud.2008.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, E. D. (1931). Materials for the study of creative thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 28, 392–410.10.1037/h0070088
   Google Scholar
• Kichuk, S., & Wiesner, W. (1997). The big five personality factors and team performance: Implications for selecting successful product design teams. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 14, 195–221.10.1016/S0923-4748(97)00010-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., & Schmeck, R. R. (2009). Role of the Big Five personality traits in predicting college students’ academic motivation and achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 47–52.10.1016/j.lindif.2008.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kryssanov, V. V., Tamaki, H., & Kitamura, S. (2001). Understanding design fundamentals: How synthesis and analysis drive creativity, resulting in emergence. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 15, 329–342.10.1016/S0954-1810(01)00023-1
   Google Scholar
• Lin, W.-S., Hsu, Y., & Liang, C. (2014). The mediator effects of conceiving imagination on academic performance of design students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24, 73–89. doi:10.1007/s10798-013-9244-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (1999). Fifty years of creativity research. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of human creativity (pp. 449–460). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D. (2003). Taking stock in taking stock. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 147–151.10.1080/10400419.2003.9651408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. S. (1999). Enhancing creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 392–393). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peeters, M. A. G., Rutte, C. G., van Tuijl, H. F. J. M., & Reymen, I. M. M. J. (2008). Designing in teams: Does personality matter? Small Group Research, 39, 438–467.10.1177/1046496408319810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peggram, R. E. (2007). Personality traits in predicting interior design students’ academic success and persistence ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas Tech University, Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. A., Marginson, S., & Murphy, P. (2008). Creativity and the global knowledge economy. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92–96.10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-markers: A brief version of Goldberg's unipolar Big-Five Markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 506–516.10.1207/s15327752jpa6303_8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shneiderman, B. (2000). Creating creativity: User interfaces for supporting innovation. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7, 114–138.10.1145/344949.345077
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. Journal of Psychology, 36, 311–322.10.1080/00223980.1953.9712897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1999). A propulsion model of types of creative contributions. Review of General Psychology, 3, 83–100.10.1037/1089-2680.3.2.83
   Google Scholar
• Stolterman, E. (1992). How system designers think. About design and methods. Some reflections based on an interview study. Retrieved from http://iris.informatik.gu.se/sjis/vol4/stolter.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Tellegen, A. (1985). Structures of mood and personality and their relevance to assessing anxiety with an emphasis on self-report. In A. H. Tuma & J. D. Maser (Eds.), Anxiety and anxiety disorders (pp. 681–706). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. R. (2008). Development and validation of an international English Big-Five Mini-Markers. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 542–548.10.1016/j.paid.2008.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser, W. (2004). Dynamic aspects of design cognition: Elements for a cognitive model of design. Retrieved from ftp://ftp.inria.fr/INRIA/publication/publi-pdf/RR/RR-5144.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zafar, S., & Meenakshi, K. (2012). A study on the relationship between extraversion-introversion and risk-taking in the context of second language acquisition. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 1, 33–40.
   Google Scholar