Peer e-tutoring: Effects on students’ participation and interaction style in online courses

References

• Aldrich, C. (2005). Learning by doing: A comprehensive guide to simulations, computer games and pedagogy in e-learning and other educational experiences. San Diego, CA: Pfeiffer.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman-Perrott, L., Davis, H., Vannest, K., Williams, L., Greenwood, C., & Parker, R. (2013). Academic benefits of peer tutoring: A meta-analytic review of single-case research. School Psychology Review, 42, 39–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 271–315.10.1207/s15327809jls0603_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, M. P., & Berge, Z. L. (1996, June). Facilitating interaction in computer mediated online courses. Proceedings of the FSU/AECT Conference on Distance Learning. Tallahassee, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2007). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL (pp. 61–91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, M., Perry, B., & Janzen, K. (2011). The making of an exemplary online educator. Distance Education, 32, 101–118.10.1080/01587919.2011.565499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, M. J., & Moore, J. S. (2013). Peer tutoring with the aid of the Internet. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44, 144–155.10.1111/bjet.2013.44.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., & Wecker, C. (2013). Toward a script theory of guidance in computer-supported collaborative learning. Educational Psychologist, 48, 56–66.10.1080/00461520.2012.748005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelle, U. (2006). Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in research practice: Purposes and advantages. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 293–311.
   Google Scholar
• Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Slotta, J. D. (2007). Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning. Learning and Instruction, 17, 708–721.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopp, B., Matteucci, M. C., & Tomasetto, C. (2012). E-tutorial support for collaborative online learning: An explorative study on experienced and inexperienced e-tutors. Computers and Education, 58, 12–20.10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ligorio, M. B., Loperfido, F. F., Sansone, N., & Spadaro, F. P. (2010). Blending educational models to design blended activities. In F. Pozzi, & D. Persico (Eds.), Techniques for fostering collaboration in online learning communities: Theoretical and practical perspectives (pp. 64–81). Hershey, PA: Igi Idea Group.
   Google Scholar
• Ligorio, M. B., & Sansone, N. (2009). Structure of a blended university course: Applying constructivist principles to blended teaching. In C. R. Payne (Ed.), Information Technology and Constructivism in Higher Education (pp. 216–230). Hershey, PA: Igi Idea Group.10.4018/978-1-60566-654-9
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderating. London: Kogan Page.10.4324/9780203465424
   Google Scholar
• Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Jochems, W. M. G., & Broers, N. J. (2007). The effect of functional roles on perceived group efficiency during computer-supported collaborative learning: a matter of triangulation. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 353–380.10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. (2008). Peer-assisted learning: A practical guide for teachers. Newton, MA: Brookline Books.10.4135/9781412963848
   Google Scholar
• Weinberger, A. (2008). CSCL scripts: Effects of social and epistemic scripts on computer supported collaborative learning. Berlin: VDM.
   Google Scholar