Learning declarative and procedural knowledge via video lectures: cognitive load and learning effectiveness

References

• Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369–406.10.1037/0033-295X.89.4.369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R. (1995). Cognitive psychology and its implications (4th ed.). New York, NY: WH Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. M., & Wu, C. H. (2015). Effects of different video lecture types on sustained attention, emotion, cognitive load, and learning performance. Computers & Education, 80, 108–121.10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielson, J., Preast, V., Bender, H., & Hassall, L. (2014). Is the effectiveness of lecture capture related to teaching approach or content type? Computers & Education, 72, 121–131.10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, V., Simo, P., Algaba, I., Albareda-Sambola, M., Salan, N., Amante, B., … Garriga, F. (2011). ‘Low-cost educational videos’ for engineering students: A new concept based on video streaming and YouTube channels. International Journal of Engineering Education, 27, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, P. J., Kim, R., & Rubin, R. (2014, March). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning @ scale conference (pp. 41–50). New York, NY: The ACM Guide to Computing Literature.
   Google Scholar
• Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1998). How seductive details do their damage: A theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 414–434.10.1037/0022-0663.90.3.414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, J. L., & Nelson, A. (2011). New technology, new pedagogy? Employing video podcasts in learning and teaching about exotic ecosystems. Environmental Education Research, 17, 393–408.10.1080/13504622.2010.545873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17, 722–738.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilioudi, C., Giannakos, M. N., & Chorianopoulos, K. (2013). Investigating differences among the commonly used video lecture styles. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Analytics on Video-based Learning (WAVe2013) (pp. 21–26). New York, NY: The Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Kizilcec, R. F., Bailenson, J. N., & Gomez, C. J. (2015). The instructor’s face in video instruction: Evidence from two large-scale field studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 724–739.10.1037/edu0000013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kizilcec, R. F., Papadopoulos, K., & Sritanyaratana, L. (2014). Showing face in video instruction: Effects on information retention, visual attention, and affect. In Proceedings of the Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2095–2102). New York, NY: The Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, A., Reysen, S., & Pierce, L. (2012). Video lecture format, student technological efficacy, and social presence in online courses. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 181–186.10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2014). Principles of multimedia learning based on social cues: Personalization, voice, and image principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 419–447). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139547369
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Fiorella, L. (2014). Principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity, and temporal contiguity principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 336–381). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139547369
   Google Scholar
• Paas, F. G., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (1993). The efficiency of instructional conditions: An approach to combine mental effort and performance measures. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 35, 737–743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pi, Z. L., & Hong, J. Z. (2016). Learning process and learning outcomes of video podcasts including the instructor and PPT slides: A Chinese case. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53, 135–144.10.1080/14703297.2015.1060133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. (1996). Learning theories (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, Y. S. (2014). The effect of Web 2.0-based teaching and learning mode on undergraduates’ learning based on different types of knowledge. E-education Research, 251, 106–110. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295–312.10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Hao, Y. H., & Lu, J. L. (2014). The effect of presenting mode of teaching video on self-directed learning effectiveness: An experimental study. E-education Research, 251, 93–105. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Winslett, G. (2014). What counts as educational video? Working toward best practice alignment between video production approaches and outcomes. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30, 487–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yerrick, R., Ross, D., & Molebash, P. (2004). Promoting equity with digital video. Learning & Leading with Technology, 31, 16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, D., Zhou, L., Briggs, R. O., & Nunamaker Jr., J. F. (2006). Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness. Information & Management, 43, 15–27.10.1016/j.im.2005.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar