Widening possibilities of interpretation when observing learning and teaching through the use of a dynamic visual notation

References

• Berger, J. (1972). Ways of seeing. London: British Broadcasting Corporation and Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Billot, J. (2010). The imagined and the real: Identifying the tensions for academic identity. Higher Education Research and Development, 29, 709–721. doi:10.1080/07294360.2010.487201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birdwhistell, R. L. (1970). Kinesics and context: Essays on body motion communication. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, J., Brown, H., & Challen, D. (2010). Peer development as an alternative to peer observation: A tool to enhance professional development. International Journal for Academic Development, 15, 215–228. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2010.497685
   Google Scholar
• Cosh, J. (1998). Peer observation in higher education: A reflective approach. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 35, 171–176. doi:10.1080/1355800980350211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1968, February). The origins of the term ‘ethnomethodology’. Proceedings of the Purdue Symposium on ethnomethodology. Lafayette, IN: Institute for the Study of Social Change. In R. Turner (1974, Ed.), Ethnomethodology: Selected readings (pp. 15–18). Harmondsworth: Penguin Education.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1972). Relations in public: Microstudies of public order. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96, 606–633. doi:10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling, D. (2002). Models of peer observation of teaching. York: LTSN Generic Subject Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Gosling, D., & Connor, K. (2009). Beyond peer observation. London: SEDA.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, C. (1986). Body movement and speech in medical interaction. Cambrdige: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511628221
   Google Scholar
• Heath, C. (2013). The dynamics of auction: Social interaction and the sale of fine art and antiques. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, C., & Luff, P. (2007). Gesture and institutional interaction: Figuring bids in auctions of fine art and antiques. Gesture, 7, 215–240. doi:10.1075/gest.7.2.05hea
   Google Scholar
• Hindmarsh, J., & Pilnick, A. (2007). Knowing bodies at work: Embodiment and ephemeral teamwork in anaesthesia. Organization Studies, 28, 1395–1416. doi:10.1177/0170840607068258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 39–103. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kell, C. (2014). Making practice education visible: Challenging assumptions about the patient’s place in placement environments. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 21, 359–366. doi:10.12968/ijtr.2014.21.8.359
   Google Scholar
• Kell, C., & Camps, C. (2015). Exploring e-journaling as a tool for academic identity work: Pilot study reflections. Educational Developments, 16, 18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Kell, C., Fahnert, B., James, V., Williamson, K., & Coxall, S. (2009). Peer review of learning and teaching: Cardiff university’s approach to peer-assisted scholarly reflective practice. In D. Gosling & K. Connor (Eds.), Beyond peer observation (pp. 37–45). London: SEDA.
   Google Scholar
• Kreber, C. (2013). Empowering the scholarship of teaching: An Arendtian and critical perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 857–869. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.602396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laban, R., & Ullman, L. (1984). A vision of dynamic space. London: Laban Archives in Association with The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambrdige: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M., & Macbeth, D. (1998). Demonstrating physics lessons. In J. G. Greeno & S. V. Goldman (Eds.), Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning (pp. 269–297). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Pastore, S., & Pentassuglia, M. (2015). Teaching as dance: A case-study for teacher practice analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 70, 16–30. doi:10.1016/j,ijer.2014.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S. (2007). Doing visual ethnography (2nd ed.). London: Sage.10.4135/9780857025029
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, D. D. (1998). Five perspectives on teaching in adult and higher education. Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1984). On doing ‘being ordinary’. In J. Maxwell Atkinson (Ed.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation (pp. 413–429). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharrock, W., & Button, G. (2011). Engineering investigations: What is made visible in making work visible? In M. H. Szymanski & J. Whalen (Eds.), Making work visible: Ethnographically grounded case studies of work practice (pp. 34–50). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511921360
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, J. (2009). Depicting gestures: Examples of the analysis of embodied communication in the arts of the West. Gesture, 9, 1–34. doi:10.1075/gest.9.1.01str
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. (2011). Embodies interaction: Language and body in the material world. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trowler, P., & Cooper, A. (2002). Teaching and learning regimes: Implicit theories and recurrent practices in the enhancement of teaching and learning through educational development programmes. Higher Education Research and Development, 21, 221–240. doi:10.1080/072943602200002074
   Google Scholar