A study of students’ perspectives on a flipped learning model and associations among personality, learning styles and satisfaction

References

• Aliweh, A. M. (2011). Exploring Egyptian EFL students’ learning styles and satisfaction with web-based materials. CALICO Journal, 29, 81–99.10.11139/cj.29.1
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Eugene, OR: The International Society for Technology in Education.
   Google Scholar
• DiTiberio, J. K. (1996). Education, learning styles and cognitive styles. In A. L. Hammer (Ed.), MBTI applications: A decade of research on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (pp. 123–166). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fahy, P. J. (2005). Student learning style and asynchronous computer-mediated conferencing (CMC) interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 19, 5–22.10.1207/s15389286ajde1901_2
   Google Scholar
• Francis, R. W. (2012). Engaged: Making large classes feel small through blended learning instructional strategies that promote increased student performance. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC), 9, 147–152.10.19030/tlc.v9i2
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, K. P. (2013). 10 Reasons to flip. Kappan, 94, 20–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, B. S., & Korth, S. J. (1999). A framework for learning to work in teams. Journal of Education for Business, 74, 28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington, R., & Loffredo, D. A. (2010). MBTI personality type and other factors that relate to preference for online versus face-to-face instruction. The Internet and Higher Education, 13, 89–95.10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, O., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. Pervin & O. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khanova, J., Roth, M. T., Rodgers, J. E., & McLaughlin, J. E. (2015). Student experiences across multiple flipped courses in a single curriculum. Medical Education, 49, 1038–1048.10.1111/medu.2015.49.issue-10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. (2012). A study on learners’ perceptional typology and relationships among the learner’s types, characteristics, and academic achievement in a blended e-Education environment. Computers & Education, 59, 304–315.10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, A. Y. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience and the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). The Kolb learning style inventory version 3.1, technical specification. Boston, MA: Hay Group.
   Google Scholar
• LaFee, S. (2013). Flipped learning: Whether it becomes a fix or is just a fad remains to be determined as educators reverse the use of students’ time in school and at home. The Education Digest, 79, 13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Li, M., & Armstrong, S. J. (2015). The relationship between Kolb’s experiential learning styles and Big Five personality traits in international managers. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 422–426.10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liaw, S. (2008). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51, 864–873.10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Perez, V., Perez-Lopez, M., & Rodriguez-Ariza, L. (2011). Blended learning in higher education: Students’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Computers & Education, 56, 818–826.10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masie, E. (2006). The blended learning imperative. In C. J. Bonk & C. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 22–26). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, R., & Fox, J. (2012). Instructional design and assessment: Vodcasts and active-learning exercises in a “Flipped Classroom” Model of a renal pharmacotherapy module. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 76, 1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, R. (2012). A study of the relationships among learning styles, participation types, and performance in programming language learning supported by online forums. Computers & Education, 58, 111–120.10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strayer, J. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15, 171–193.10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4
   Google Scholar
• Tune, J. D., Sturek, M., & Basile, D. P. (2013). Flipped classroom model improves graduate student performance in cardiovascular, respiratory, renal physiology. AJP: Advances in Physiology Education, 37, 316–320.10.1152/advan.00091.2013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2015). Personalising learning: Exploring student and teacher perceptions about flexible learning and assessment in a flipped university course. Computers & Education, 88, 354–369.10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar