SWIFT beginnings – exploring the effectiveness and transformative character of a Summer Writing Institute For Teachers (SWIFT)

References

• Adler-Kassner, L., & Harrington, S. (2002). Basic writing as a political act: Public conversations about writing and literacies. New York, NY: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adler-Kassner, L. & Wardle, E. (Eds.). (2016). Naming what we know. Threshold concepts of writing studies. Classroom edition. Logan: Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, R. (2008). The case for a National Writing Project for teachers. CfBT Education Trust. Retrieved from http://cdn.cfbt.com/~/media/cfbtcorporate/files/research/2008/r-the-case-for-a-national-writing-project-for-teachers-2008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Anson, C. M., & Moore, J. L. (Eds.). (2016). Critical transitions: Writing and the question of transfer. Perspectives on Writing, Fort Collins: The WAC Clearinghouse and University Press of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift. Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, R. (2009). Knowing and becoming in the higher education curriculum. Studies in Higher Education, 34, 429–440.10.1080/03075070902771978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake Yancey, K. (2016). Learning to write effectively requires different kinds of practice, time, and effort. In L. Adler-Kassner & E. Wardle (Eds.), Naming what we know. Threshold concepts of writing studies. Classroom edition  (pp. 64–65). Logan: Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, G., & Rowland, S. (2014). Inspirational writing for academic publication. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, D. (2015). The rise of writing. Redefining mass literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316106372
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, J. (2017). The good writer: Virtue ethics and the teaching of writing. College English, 79, 229–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbow, P., & Belanoff, P. (2003). Being a writer. A community of writers revisited. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Emig, J. (1977). Writing as a mode of learning. College Composition and Communication, 28, 122–128.10.2307/356095
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, A., & Tighe-Mooney, S. (2015). Recall, recognise, re-invent: The value of facilitating writing transfer in the writing centre setting. Journal of Academic Writing, 5, 29–42.10.18552/joaw.v5i2
   Google Scholar
• Geller, A. E. & Eodice, M. (Eds.). (2013). Working with faculty writers. Logan: Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Ireland. (1997). Universities act, 1997. Dublin: Dublin Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, B. (2006). Writing in the company of other women: Exceeding the boundaries. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 483–495.10.1080/03075070600800624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, J. (2000). Teachers at the center: A memoir of the early years of the National Writing Project. The Quarterly, Fall, 22, 417–423.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (2002). Does it make a difference? Evaluating professional development. Educational Leadership. Redesigning Professional Development, 59, 45–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, S., & Lee, J. (2010). Activism and rhetoric. Theories and contexts for political engagement. Abington: Taylor & Francis eBooks.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, J., & Kayser Kirkpatrick, W. (2016). Kirkpatrick’s four levels of training evaluation. Alexandria: ATD Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R., & Fuller, D. (2005). The academic’s guide to publishing. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lea, M. R., & Stierer, B. (2011). Changing academic identities in changing academic workplaces: Learning from academics’ everyday professional writing practices. Teaching in Higher Education, 16, 605–616.10.1080/13562517.2011.560380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, T., Whitehead, D., Dix, S., & Cawkwell, G. (2011). New Zealand teachers respond to the ‘National Writing Project’ experience. Teacher Development, 15, 273–291.10.1080/13664530.2011.608509
   Google Scholar
• Malta Writing Project (MWP). (2015). Retrieved from http://mwp.skola.edu.mt
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, S. (2012). “The pedagogy of writing across the curriculum.” In T. Myers Zawacki & P. M. Rogers (Eds.), Writing across the curriculum: A critical sourcebook (pp. 149–164). Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, J. L., & Bass, R. (2017). Understanding writing transfer. Implications for transformative student learning in higher education. Sterling: Stylus Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, R. (2015). Writing in social spaces: A social processes approach to academic writing. London: Routledge & The Society for Research into Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Myers Zawacki, T. & Rogers, P. M. (Eds.). (2012). Writing across the curriculum: A critical sourcebook. Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
   Google Scholar
• National Writing Project (NWP). (2010). Research Brief No 2. Retrieved from http://www.nwp.org/cs/public/download/nwp_file/14004/FINAL_2010_Research_Brief.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Writing Project (NWP). (2016). Retrieved from http://www.nwp.org
   Google Scholar
• National Writing Project UK (NWP-UK). (2015). Retrieved from http://www.nwp.org.uk
   Google Scholar
• O’Farrell, C., & Fitzmaurice, M. (2013). Academic developers using narrative to support our professional development. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50, 227–237.10.1080/14703297.2012.760776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riedner, R., O’Sullivan, I., & Farrell, A. (2015). An introduction to Writing In the Disciplines (WID) curriculum. Maynooth: All Ireland Society for Higher Education/Irish Network for the Enhancement of Writing.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, S. (2016). All writers have more to learn. In L. Adler-Kassner, & E. Wardle (Eds.), Naming what we know. Threshold concepts of writing studies. Classroom edition (pp. 59–61). Logan: Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J., & Wrigley, S. (2016). Introducing teachers’ writing groups. Exploring the theory and practice. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• St John, M., & Stokes, L. (2012). The power of the NWP as it makes an evolutionary leap forward. An evaluator’s perspective. Inverness Research. Retrieved from http://inverness-research.org/reports/slides_nwp/2012-03_Slds_NWP-SpringMtg-final_050112.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, L. (2011). The enduring quality and value of the national writing project’s teacher development institutes: Teachers’ assessments of NWP contributions to their classroom practice and development as leaders. Retrieved from http://www.inverness-research.org/reports/2011-11-Rpt-NWP-NWP-Survey-TeacherInst-Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sword, H. (2012). Stylish academic writing. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thaiss, C., Brauer, G., Carlino, P., Ganobcsik-Williams, L., & Sinha, A. (2012). Writing programs worldwide: Profiles of academic writing in many places. Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, P., & Kamler, B. (2016). Detox your writing: Strategies for doctoral researchers. London: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Trondheim Writing Project. (2015). Retrieved from http://www.skrivesenteret.no/om-oss/english/
   Google Scholar
• WAC Clearinghouse Publications & Series. (1997–2017). Retrieved from https://wac.colostate.edu
   Google Scholar
• Wisker, G. (2013). Articulate – Academic writing, refereeing, editing and publishing our work in learning, teaching and educational development. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50, 344–356.10.1080/14703297.2013.839337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yancey, K., Robertson, L., & Taczak, K. (2014). Writing across contexts: Transfer, composition, and sites of writing. Logan: Utah State University Press.10.2307/j.ctt6wrr95
   Google Scholar