The effects of online peer feedback and epistemic beliefs on students’ argumentation-based learning

References

• Bayerlein, L. (2014). Students’ feedback preferences: How do students react to timely and automatically generated assessment feedback? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 39 , 916–931.10.1080/02602938.2013.870531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, C. , Cherry, R. , Copley, B. , Fleischer, S. , Pollard, B. , & Sartisky, M. (1984). Studying the writing abilities of a university freshman class: Strategies from a case study. In R. Beach & L. Bridwell (Eds.), New directions in composition research (pp. 19–52). New York, NY : Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, B. R. (2007). Is it worth the effort? How feedback influences students’ subsequent submission of assessable work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 32 , 571–581.10.1080/02602930601116912
   Google Scholar
• Gabelica, C. , Van den Bossche, P. , Segers, M. , & Gijselaers, W. (2012). Feedback, a powerful level in teams: A review. Educational Research Review , 7 , 123–144.10.1016/j.edurev.2011.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabelica, C. , Van den Bossche, P. , De Maeyer, S. , Segers, M. , & Gijselaers, W. (2014). The effect of team feedback and guided reflexivity on team performance change. Learning and Instruction , 34 , 86–96.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glassner, A. (2017). Evaluating arguments in instruction: Theoretical and practical directions. Thinking Skills and Creativity , 24 , 95–103.10.1016/j.tsc.2017.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, B. K. (2001). Personal epistemology research: Implications for learning and teaching. Educational Psychology Review , 13 (4), 353–383.10.1023/A:1011965830686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, B. K. , & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research , 67 , 88–140.10.3102/00346543067001088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Infante, D. A. , & Rancer, A. S. (1982). A conceptualization and measure of argumentativeness. Journal of Personality Assessment , 46 , 72–80.10.1207/s15327752jpa4601_13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellogg, R. T. , & Whiteford, A. P. (2009). Training advanced writing skills: The case for deliberate practice. Educational Psychologist , 44 , 250–266.10.1080/00461520903213600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, P. , & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A. , Buckingham-Shum, S. J. , & Carr, C. S. (Eds.). (2003). Visualizing argumentation: Software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making . London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kollar, I. , & Fischer, F. (2010). Peer assessment as collaborative learning: A cognitive perspective. Learning and Instruction , 20 , 344–348.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. , Cheney, R. , & Weinstock, M. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development , 15 , 309–328.10.1016/S0885-2014(00)00030-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarou, D. , Sutherland, R. , & Erduran, S. (2016). Argumentation in science education as a systemic activity: An activity-theoretical perspective. International Journal of Educational Research , 79 , 150–166.10.1016/j.ijer.2016.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muis, K. R. (2007). The role of epistemic beliefs in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist , 42 , 173–190.10.1080/00461520701416306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munneke, L. , Andriessen, J. , Kanselaar, G. , & Kirschner, P. (2007). Supporting interactive argumentation: Influence of representational tools on discussing a wicked problem. Computers in Human Behaviour , 23 , 1072–1088.10.1016/j.chb.2006.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O. (2016). Considering students’ epistemic beliefs to facilitate their argumentative discourse and attitudinal change with a digital dialogue game. Innovations in Education and Teaching International , 1–9. doi:10.1080/14703297.2016.1208112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O. , & Mulder, M. (2016). Design and evaluation of a digital module with guided peer feedback for student learning biotechnology and molecular life sciences, attitudinal change, and satisfaction. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education , 45 , 31–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O. , Weinberger, A. , Biemans, H. J. A. , Mulder, M. , & Chizari, M. (2012). Argumentation-based computer supported collaborative learning (ABCSCL). A systematic review and synthesis of fifteen years of research. Educational Research Review , 7 , 79–106.10.1016/j.edurev.2011.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O. , Biemans, H. J. A. , & Mulder, M. (2016). Relations between scripted online peer feedback processes and quality of written argumentative essay. Internet and Higher Education , 31 , 20–31.10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O. , McAlister, S. , & Mulder, M. (2016). Impacts of a digital dialogue game and epistemic beliefs on argumentative discourse and willingness to argue. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning , 17 .https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O. , Kirschner, P. , Biemans, H. J. A. , & Mulder, M. (2017). Promoting argumentation competence: Extending from first- to second-order scaffolding through adaptive fading. Educational Psychology Review , 1–24. doi:10.1007/s10648-017-9400-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, E. M. , & Bendixen, L. D. (2003). Approaching and avoiding arguments: The role of epistemological beliefs, need for cognition, and extraverted personality traits. Contemporary Educational Psychology , 28 , 573–595.10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00062-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, E. M. , Sinatra, G. M. , & Poliquin, A. (2008). Role of epistemic beliefs and scientific argumentation in science learning. International Journal of Science Education , 30 , 1977–1999.10.1080/09500690701545919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J. (1982). The concept of argument and arguing. In J. R. Cox & C. A. Willard (Eds.), Advances in argumentation theory and research (pp. 3–23). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, S. , & Jonassen, D. H. (2006). Scaffolding online argumentation during problem solving. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning , 23 , 95–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. F. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science , 328 , 463–466.10.1126/science.1183944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, J. , & Karabacak, E. (2010). The analysis of Toulmin elements in Chinese EFL university argumentative writing. System , 38 , 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosman, T. , Mayer, A. K. , Peter, J. , & Krampen, G. (2016). Need for cognitive closure may impede the effectiveness of epistemic belief instruction. Advance online publication. Learning and Individual Differences , 49 , 406–413.10.1016/j.lindif.2016.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosman, T. , Mayer, A. K. , Kerwer, M. , & Krampen, G. (2017). The differential development of epistemic beliefs in psychology and computer science students: A four-wave longitudinal study. Learning and Instruction , 49 , 166–177.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, S. , Erduran, S. , & Osborne, J. F. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education , 28 (2–3), 235–260.10.1080/09500690500336957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symons, C. (2017). Supporting emergent bilinguals’ argumentation: Evaluating evidence in informational science texts. Linguistics and Education , 38 , 79–91.10.1016/j.linged.2017.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trevors, G. , Feyzi-Behnagh, R. , Azevedo, R. , & Bouchet, F. (2016). Self-regulated learning varies as a function of epistemic beliefs and task conditions: Mixed method evidence from eye tracking, concurrent and retrospective reports. Learning and Instruction , 42 , 31–46.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevors, G. , Muis, K. , Pekrun, R. , Sinatra, G. M. , & Muijselaar, M. M. L. (2017). Exploring the relations between epistemic beliefs, emotions, and learning from texts. Contemporary Educational Psychology , 48 , 116–132.10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Amelsvoort, M. , Andriessen, J. , & Kanselaar, G. (2007). Representational tools in computer-supported collaborative argumentation-based learning: How Dyads work with constructed and inspected argumentative diagrams. The Journal of the Learning Sciences , 16 , 485–521.10.1080/10508400701524785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, N. V. (2001). Perspectives on argument . NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar