Using game-based training to improve students’ assessment skills and intrinsic motivation in peer assessment

References

• Bellofatto, L., Bohl, N., Casey, M., Krill, M., & Dodge, B. (2001). A rubric for evaluating WebQuests. Retrieved from http://webquest.org/sdsu/webquestrubric.html
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practice. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Charles, T., Bustard, D., & Black, M. (2011). Experiences of promoting student engagement through game-enhanced learning. In M. Ma, A. Oikonomou, & L. C. Jain (Eds.), Serious games and edutainment applications (pp. 425–445). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (1999). Peer and teacher assessment of the oral and written tasks of a group project. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24, 301–314.
   Google Scholar
• Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24, 331–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N. (1995). Peer feedback marking: Developing peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International, 32, 175–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. (1999). Using assessment strategically to change the way students learn. In S. Brown & A. Glasner (Eds.), Assessment matters in higher education: Choosing and using diverse approaches (pp. 41–53). Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartberg, Y., Guernsel, A. B., Simpson, N. J., & Balaster, V. (2008). Development of student writing in biochemistry using calibrated peer review. Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8, 29–44.
   Google Scholar
• Huizenga, J., Admiraal, W., Akkerman, S., & Dam, G. T. (2009). Mobile game-based learning in secondary education: Engagement, motivation and learning in a mobile city game. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 332–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intrinsic Motivation Inventory. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://selfdeterminationtheory.org/intrinsic-motivation-inventory/
   Google Scholar
• Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2010). Peer assessment as collaborative learning: A cognitive perspective. Learning and Instruction, 20, 344–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepper, M. R., & Cordova, D. I. (1992). A desire to be taught: Instructional consequences of intrinsic motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 16, 187–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L. (2017). The role of anonymity in peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42, 645–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., & Fei, G. (2016). The effect of peer assessment on project performance of students at different learning levels. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41, 885–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Likkel, L. (2012). Calibrated peer review essays increase student confidence in assessing their own writing. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41, 42.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, C. H., Liu, E. Z. F., Chen, Y. L., Liou, P. Y., Chang, M., Wu, C. H., & Yuan, S. M. (2013). Gamebased remedial instruction in mastery learning for upper-primary school students. Educational Technology & Society, 16, 271–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., & Li, L. (2014). Assessment training effects on student assessment skills and task performance in a technology-facilitated per assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39, 275–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., Li, L., & Zhang, Z. (2018). Small group discussion as a key component in online assessment training for enhanced student learning in web-based peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43, 207–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuley, E., Duncan, T., & Tammen, V. V. (1989). Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60, 48–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (2000). The use of student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25, 23–38.
   Google Scholar
• Papastergiou, M. (2009). Digital game-based learning in high school computer science education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Computers and Education, 52, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patri, M. (2002). The influence of peer feedback on self- and peer-assessment of oral skills. Language Testing, 19, 109–131.
   Google Scholar
• Pelaez, N. J. (2002). Problem-based writing with peer review improves academic performance in physiology. Advances in Physiology Education, 26, 174–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, N. (2001). An examination of the use of peer rating for formative assessment in the context of the theory of consumption values. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26, 235–246.
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. (1999). Computer-assisted peer review. In S. Brown, J. Bull, & P. Race (Eds.), Computer-assisted assessment in higher education (pp. 95–102). London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., Mims, V., & Koestner, R. (1983). Relation of reward contingency and inter- personal context to intrinsic motivation: A review and test using cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 736–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito, H., & Fujita, T. (2004). Characteristics and user acceptance of peer rating in EFL writing classrooms. Language Teaching Research, 8, 31–54.
   Google Scholar
• Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Scavenger Hunt. (2012). In dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.dictionary.com/browse/scavenger-hunt
   Google Scholar
• Schumacker, R. E. (2015). Using R with multivariate statistics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Somervell, H. (1993). Issues in assessment, enterprise and higher education: The case for self-, peer and collaborative assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(3), 221–233.
   Google Scholar
• Song, Y., Hu, Z., Gehringer, E. F., Morris, J., Kidd, J., & Ringleb, S. (2016). Toward better training in peer assessment: Does calibration help? Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://scholar.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1051&context=teachinglearning_fac_pubs
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68, 249–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. (2010). Methodological quandaries in studying process and outcomes in peer assessment. Learning and Instruction, 20, 339–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J., Smith, E. F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2000). Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25, 149–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, M. L., & Tsai, C. (2008). Online peer assessment in an inservice science and mathematics teacher education course. Teaching in Higher Education, 13, 55–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar