Using principles of authentic assessment to redesign written examinations and tests

References

• Almond, R. J. (2009). Group assessment: Comparing group and individual undergraduate module marks. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34, 141–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altay, B. (2014). User-centered design through learner-centered instruction. Teaching in Higher Education, 19, 138–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. A. (2001). Taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Ashford-Rowe, K., Herrington, J., & Brown, C. (2014). Establishing the critical elements that determine authentic assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39, 205–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avery, P. G., Freeman, C., & Carmichael, D. (2012). Developing authentic instruction in the social studies. Journal of Research in Education, 12, 50–56.
   Google Scholar
• Betts, L., Elder, T. J., Hartley, J., & Trueman, M. (2009). Does correction for guessing reduce students’ performance on multiple-choice examinations? Yes? No? Sometimes? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., & West, A. (2004). Understanding the rules of the game: Marking peer assessment as a medium for developing students´ conceptions of assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 14, 20–30.
   Google Scholar
• Bosco, A. M., & Ferns, S. (2014). Embedding of authentic assessment in work- integrated learning curriculum. Asia- Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 15, 281–290.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. (2010). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22, 151–167.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. A., Bull, J., & Pendlebury, M. (2013). Assessing student learning in higher education. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, A., Sidebotham, M., Creedy, D., Fenwick, J., & Gamble, J. (2015). Strengthening partnership: The involvement of health care providers in the evaluation of authentic assessment within midwifery undergraduate education. Nurse Education in Practice, 15, 327–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, W. M. (2009). Groupwork as form of assessment: Common problems and recommended solutions. Higher Education, 58, 563–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, M., Wilson, J., & Ennis, S. (2012). Multiple-choice question test. A convenient, flexible and effective learning tool? A case study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49, 111–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edstrom, K. (2008). Was doing course evaluations as if learning matters most. Higher Education Research and Development, 27, 95–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endedijk, M. D., & Vermunt, J. D. (2013). Relations between student teachers’ learning patterns and their concrete learning activities. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39, 56–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. (2009). Teaching for understanding at university. Deep approaches and distinctive ways of thinking. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, M. A., Veiga-Simão, M. A., Barros, A., & Pereira, D. (2015). Perceptions of effectiveness, fairness and feedback of assessment methods: A study in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 40, 1523–1534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, S., Bowles, M., Ranmuthugala, D., & Brooks, B. (2017). Authentic assessment in seafarer education: Using literature review to investigate its validity and reliability through rubrics. WMU J Marit Aff, 15, 317–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitanjali, M. (2016). The three Rs of written assessment: The JIPMER experience. Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics, 7, 115–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzomi, A., Male, S., & Miller, K. (2015). Students´ responses to authentic assessment designed to develop commitment to performing at their best. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlen, W. (2005). Teachers’ summative practices and assessment for learning – Tensions and synergies. Curriculum Journal, 16, 207–223.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, C., Hammer, S., Collins, P., & Chardon, T. (2011). The real deal: Using authentic assessment to promote student engagement in the first and second years of a regional program. Legal Education Review, 21, 97–121.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinton, D. P., & Higson, H. (2017). A large-scale examination of the effectiveness of anonymous marking in reducing group performance differences in higher education assessment. PloS one, 12, e0182711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxham, M., Campbell, F., & Westwood, J. (2012). Oral versus written assessments: A test of student performance and attitudes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37, 125–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, J., McDaniel, M., Woodard, S., & Kummer, T. (2014). Teaching to the test… or testing to teach: Exams requiring higher order thinking skills encourage greater conceptual understanding. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 306–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. P. (2009). Joining together. Group theory and group skills (10th ed.). New Jersey, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, S., & Perkins, T. (2014). Engaging students though assessment: The success and limitations of the ASPAL (Authentic self and peer-assessment for learning) model. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 11, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, S., Perkins, T., & Kennedy-Clark, S. (2015). Using self- and peer-assessments for summative purposes: Analysing the relative validity of the AASL (Authentic assessment for sustainable learning) model. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesage, E., Valcke, M., & Sabbe, E. (2013). Scoring methods for multiple choice ssessment in higher education—Is it still a matter of number right scoring or negative marking? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39(118–193). doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling Lau, K. (2013). Chinese language teachers’ perception and implementation of self-regulated leaning-based instruction. Teacher and Teaching Education, 31, 56–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipnevich, A. A., Berg, D. A., & Smith, J. K. (2016). Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment. Spain: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• López-Pastor, V., & Sicilia- Camacho, A. (2017). Formative and shared assessment in higher education. Lessons learned and challenges for the future. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42, 77–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoud, F. A. (2014). A cross-cultural study of students’ perceptions of assessment practices in higher education. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 7, 293–315.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, M., O´Brien, M., Roberts, K., & Whyte, D. (2018). Critical pedagogy an assessment in higher education: The ideal of “authenticity” in learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 19, 9–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Rizo, F., & Mercado, A. (2015). Estudios sobre prácticas de evaluación en el aula: Revisión de la literatura. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 17, 17–32. Retrieved from http://redie.uabc.mx/vol17no1/contenido-mtnzrizo-mercado.htm
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, T. (2012). Assessment in higher education in the professions: Action research as an authentic assessment task. Teaching In Higher Education, 17, 686–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe, A., & O’Connor, U. (2014). Student-centred learning: The role and responsibility of the lecturer. Teaching in Higher Education, 19, 350–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McColongue, T. (2012). But is it fair? Developing students´ understanding of grading complex written work through peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37, 113–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medland, E. (2016). Assessment in higher education: Drivers, barriers and directions for change in the UK. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41, 81–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely, P., & Tucker, J. (2012). Using business simulations as authentic assessment tools. American Journal of Business Education, 5, 449–456.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39, 102–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’donovan, B., Price, M., & Rust, C. (2008). Developing student understanding of assessment standards: A nested hierarchy of approaches. Teaching in Higher Education, 13, 205–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Moore, L. M., & Baldock, T. E. (2007). Peer assessment learning sessions (PALS): An innovative feedback technique for large engineering classes. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32, 43–55.
   Google Scholar
• Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2010). American management association critical skills survey (pp. 21). Tucson: Survey.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, D., Flores, M. A., & Barros, A. (2017). Perceptions of Portuguese undergraduate students about assessment: A study in five public universities. Educational Studies, 43, 442–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawson, K., Dunlosky, J., & Sciartellli, S. (2013). The power of successive relearning: Improving performance on course exams and long term retention. Educational Psychology Review, 25, 523–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, J., Homer, C., Smith, R., & Gray, J. (2012). Learning through authentic assessment. An evaluation of a new development in the undergraduate midwifery curriculum. Nurse Educational and Practice, 13, 471–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. T. (2015). Coursework versus examinations in end-of-module assessment: A literature review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40, 439–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schell, J., & Porter, J. (2018). Applying the science of learning to classroom teaching: The critical importance of aligning learning with testing. Journal of Food Science Education, 17, 36–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Panadero, E. (2017). Developing evaluative judgement: Enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher Education, 76, 467–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tait-McCutcheon, S., Drake, M., & Sherley, B. (2011). From direct instruction to active construction: Teaching and learning basic facts. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 23, 321–345.
   Google Scholar
• Thornburn, M. (2008). Articulating a Merleau-Pontain phenomenology of physical education: The quest for active student engagement and authentic assessment in high-stakes examination awards. European Physical Education Review, 4, 263–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanaki, Z., & Memarian, R. (2009). Professional ethics: Beyond the clinical competency. Journal Professional Nursing, 25, 285–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villarroel, V., Bloxham, S., Bruna, D., Bruna, C., & Herrera-Seda, C. (2018). Authentic assessment: Creating a blueprint for course design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(840–854), 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Vu, T., & Dall´Alba, G. (2014). Authentic assessment for student learning: An ontological conceptualization. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46, 778–791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wass, R., Harland, T., & Mercer, A. (2011). Scaffolding critical thinking in the zone of proximal development. Higher Education Research & Development, 30, 317–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, D., Dahlin, B., & Ekholm, M. (2005). Awareness of backwash effect of assessment: A phenomenographic study of the views of Hong Kong and Swedish lectures. Instructional Science, 33, 283–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2006). Examining the teaching life. Educational Leadership, 63, 26–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, P., Ding, L., & Mazur, E. (2017). Peer instruction in introductory physics: A method to bring about positive changes in students’ attitudes and beliefs. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13, 0101041–0101049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar