Implementing a discipline-specific reflective critical thinking module for Literature in English in Malaysia

References

• Al-Ahmed, F. H. (1994). Case study: Effect of the critical thinking approaches to teaching and learning in secondary schools of Bahrain. Educational and Training Technology International, 31, 322–324.
   Google Scholar
• Atherton, C. (2005). Defining literary criticism: Scholarship, authority and the possession of literary knowledge, 1880-2002. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Banegas, D. L., & Villacanas de Castro, L. S. (2016). Criticality. ELT Journal, 70, 455–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, A. (2009). World and time: Teaching literature in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, P. (2014). English in practice: In pursuit of English studies (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury: London.
   Google Scholar
• Bok, D. (2006). Our underachieving college: A candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning more. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, G. (2015). Beyond critical thinking to critical being: Criticality in higher education and life. International Journal of Educational Research, 71, 86–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagleton, T. (1994). Ideology: An introduction. London: Longman Critical Readers.
   Google Scholar
• Eagleton, T. (2013). How to read literature. New Heaven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, D. (2014). Promoting critical thinking through effective group work: A teaching intervention for Hong Kong primary school students. International Journal of Educational Research, 66, 45–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grace, P. (1987). The Butterflies. Retrieved from https://chipbruce.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/butterflies.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2006). Sukatan pelajaran dan senari kary baru untuk mata pelajaran elektif Kesusasteraan dalam Bahasa Inggeris sekolah menengah atas mulai tahun 2007 bagi pelajar tingkatan 4 [KP(PPK)900–1/8/2 (17)]. Retrieved from http://missymacy.me/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/sp_lit_eng-copy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lacey, G. (2008). International examinations after 1945. In S. Raban (Ed.), Examining the world: A history of the University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate (pp. 106–130). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, K. (2017). Understanding and teaching critical thinking – A new approach. International Journal of Educational Research, 84, 37–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, C. (2000). Critical Issues: Limits of identification: The personal, pleasurable, and critical in reader response. Journal of Literacy Research, 32, 253–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, J. W. (2016). The development and present state of post-16 Malaysian higher school certificate or Sijil Tinggi Pelajaran Malaysia (STPM) Literature in English: A multiple case study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). United Kingdom, Cambridge University.
   Google Scholar
• Majlis Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2014). Laporan Peperiksaan STPM dan MUET Tahun 2014. Retrieved from http://portal.mpm.edu.my/en/laporan-peperiksaan-stpm-dan-muet-2014
   Google Scholar
• Malaysia, K. P. (2003). Kurikulum Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah Curriculum Specifications English Language Form 4. Retrieved from http://rp.smkrajaperempuanipoh.com/Sukatan%20pelajaran/hsp_bi_f4%5B1%5D.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mason, M. (2007). Critical thinking and learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39, 339–349.
   Google Scholar
• Matheson, R., Wilkinson, S. C., & Gilhooly, E. (2012). Promoting critical thinking and collaborative working through assessment: Combining patchwork text and online discussion boards. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49, 257–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nightingale, P. (2007). A-level english literature: Learning and assessment. Changing English, 14(2), 135–144. doi:10.1080/13586840701442943
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R. (1984). Teaching critical thinking in the “strong” senses: A focus on self-deception, world views, and a dialectical mode of analysis. Informal Logic, 4, 2–7.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2013). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your professional and personal life. New York: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Probst, R. E. (1994). Reader response theory and the English curriculum. The English Journal, 83, 37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. London: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, J. (1987). Understanding teenagers’ reading: Reading processes and the teaching of literature. Norwood, SA: Australian Association for the Teaching of English.
   Google Scholar
• Tofade, T., Elsner, J., & Haines, S. T. (2013). Best practice strategies for effective use of questions as a teaching tool. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77, 155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar