Using a modified version of SIMSOC to promote active learning in crime causation and response in an unjust society

References

• Bredemeier, M. E., & Greenblat, C. S. (1981). The educational effectiveness of simulation games: A synthesis of findings. Simulation & Games, 12, 307–332.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, D. M., & Dunn, J. M. (2018). Simulated complexity: A new classroom simulation to teach about campaign-finance laws. PS: Political Science & Politics, 51, 445–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, J., Dukes, R., & Gamson, W. (2009). Assessment in simulation and gaming: A review of the last 40 years. Simulation & Gaming, 40, 553–568.
   Google Scholar
• Chui, W. H., & Chan, H. C. (2012). Outreach social workers for at-risk youth: A test of their attitudes towards crime and young offenders in Hong Kong. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 2273–2279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coghlan, C. L., & Huggins, D. W. (2004). “That’s not fair!”: A simulation exercise in social stratification and structural inequality. Teaching Sociology, 32, 177–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DioGuardi, S. (2017). Teaching criminology theory: Using a Piaget platform to support higher level learning. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 28, 441–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorn, D. S. (1989). Simulation games: One more tool on the pedagogical shelf. Teaching Sociology, 17, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A. (1969a). SIMSOC: Participant’s manual with selected readings. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A. (1969b). SIMSOC: Coordinator’s manual with complete materials. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gorman, M., & Rosenwein, R. (1995). Simulating social epistemology. Social Epistemology, 9, 71–79.
   Google Scholar
• Gredler, M. E. (2004). Games and simulations and their relationships to learning. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 571–581). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Greenblat, C. S. (1973). Teaching with simulation games: A review of claims and evidence. Teaching Sociology, 1, 62–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegarty, W. H. (1975). Changes in students’ attitudes as a result of participating in a simulated game. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 136–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinds-Aldrich, M. (2012). Teaching theory analogically: Using music to explain criminological theory. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 23, 481–499.
   Google Scholar
• Hirose, Y., Taresawa, Y., & Okuda, T. (2005). Collective action and subordinate group identity in a simulated society game. Japanese Psychological Research, 47, 12–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kikkawa, T. (2014). Roles of play: The implications of roles in games. In W. C. Kriz (Ed.), The shift from teaching to learning: Individual, collective and organizational learning through gaming simulation (pp. 80–87). Bielefeld: Bertelsmann.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, S. (2000). Undergraduate education in political psychology. Political Psychology, 21, 603–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, D. P., & Merenstein, B. (2005). Working with stories: An active learning approach to theories of deviance. Teaching Sociology, 33, 66–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallison, D. J., & O’Hanlon, E. (2017). Between the patient and politics – A ready-to-use simulation for human service practitioners. Simulation & Gaming, 48, 855–870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, M. (2015). Simulating secularization: A pedagogical strategy for the sociology of religion. Teaching Sociology, 43, 46–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moskalenko, S., & McCauley, C. (2009). Measuring political mobilization: The distinction between activism and radicalism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 22, 239–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, P. E., & Myers, D. J. (2002). Formal models in studying collective action and social movements. In B. Klandermans & S. Staggenborg (Eds.), Methods of social movement research (pp. 32–61). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ortet-Fabregat, G., & Perez, J. (1992). An assessment of the attitudes towards crime among professionals in the criminal justice system. The British Journal of Criminology, 32, 193–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paino, M., May, M., Burrington, L. A., & Becker, J. H. (2017). Intersectionopoly: A simulation of the wage gap. Teaching Sociology, 45, 177–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, L., Witt, J., & Huntington, C. (2015). Teaching “Real Utopias” through experiential learning. Teaching Sociology, 43, 262–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petranek, C. F., Corey, S., & Black, R. (1992). Three levels of learning in simulations: Participating, debriefing, and journal writing. Simulation & Gaming, 23, 174–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shreeve, M. W. (2008). Beyond the didactic classroom: Educational models to encourage active student involvement in learning. The Journal of Chiropractic Education, 22, 23–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Szafran, R. F., & Mandolini, A. F. (1980). Test performance and concept recognition: The effect of a simulation game on two types of cognitive knowledge. Simulation and Games, 11, 326–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2017). The effect of games and simulations on higher education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14, 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, B. A., Coalter, T. M., & Rasheed, A. M. A. (1997). Simulation games in business policy courses: Is there value for students? Journal of Education for Business, 72, 170–174.
   Google Scholar
• Wolpe, H., McDonald, S., Nindorera, E., McClintock, E., Lemperur, A., Nsengimana, F., … Blair, A. (2004). Rebuilding peace and state capacity in war-torn Burundi. The Round Table, 93, 457–467.
   Google Scholar
• Woodall, D. (2017). Interrupting constrictions of a criminalized other through a revised criminal activities checklist classroom exercise. Teaching Sociology, 45, 161–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar