Language feedback responses, voices and identity (re)construction: Experiences of Chinese international doctoral students

References

• Ajjawi, R., & Boud, D. (2017). Researching feedback dialogue: An interactional analysis approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42, 252–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. (In M. Holquist (Ed.) (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Basturkmen, H., East, M., & Bitchener, J. (2014). Supervisors’ on-script feedback comments on drafts of dissertations: Socialising students into the academic discourse community. Teaching in Higher Education, 19, 432–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J., Basturkmen, H., & East, M. (2010). The focus of supervisor written feedback to thesis/dissertation students. International Journal of English Studies, 10, 79–97.
   Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Can, G., & Walker, A. (2011). A model for doctoral students’ perceptions and attitudes toward written feedback for academic writing. Research in Higher Education, 52, 508–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canagarajah, S. (2011). Writing to learn and learning to write by shuttling between languages. In K. M. Manchon (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 111–132). Philadelphia: John Benjamin.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, S., & Kumar, V. (2017). “Ignoring me is part of learning”: Supervisory feedback on doctoral writing. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54, 68–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Magalhães, M. B., Cotterall, S., & Mideros, D. (2018). Identity, voice and agency in two EAL doctoral writing contexts. Journal of Second Language Writing. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2018.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, S., Manathunga, C., Prinsen, G., Tallon, R., & Cornforth, S. (2018). African international doctoral students in New Zealand: Englishes, doctoral writing and intercultural supervision. Higher Education Research & Development, 37, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• East, M., Bitchener, J., & Basturkmen, H. (2012). What constitutes effective feedback to postgraduate research students? The students’ perspective. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 9, 7.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, C. (1984). Editor’s preface. In M. M. Bakhtin (Ed.), Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics (pp. xxix–xliii). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. London, England: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2016). Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 58–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inouye, K. S., & McAlpine, L. (2017). Developing scholarly identity: Variation in agentive responses to supervisor feedback. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 14, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, V., & Stracke, E. (2007). An analysis of written feedback on a PhD thesis. Teaching in Higher Education, 12, 461–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I. (2014). Feedback in writing: Issues and challenges. Assessing Writing, 19, 1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manathunga, C. (2014). Intercultural postgraduate supervision: Reimagining time, place and knowledge. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuda, P. K. (2015). Identity in written discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 140–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parr, J. M., & Timperley, H. S. (2010). Feedback to writing, assessment for teaching and learning and student progress. Assessing Writing, 15, 68–85.
   Google Scholar
• Politzer-Ahles, S., Holliday, J. J., Girolamo, T., Spychalska, M., & Berkson, K. H. (2016). Is linguistic injustice a myth? A response to Hyland (2016). Journal of Second Language Writing, 34, 3–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, M., Handley, K., & Millar, J. (2011). Feedback: Focusing attention on engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 879–896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyhältö, K., Vekkaila, J., & Keskinen, J. (2015). Fit matters in the supervisory relationship: Doctoral students and supervisors perceptions about the supervisory activities. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52, 4–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stracke, E., & Kumar, V. (2016). Exploring doctoral students’ perceptions of language use in supervisory written feedback practices - Because “feedback is hard to have.”. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 39, 122–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ting-Toomey, S. (2005). The matrix of face: An updated face-negotiation theory. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 71–92). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, T., & Li, L. Y. (2011). “Tell me what to do” vs. “guide me through it”: Feedback experiences of international doctoral students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12, 101–112.
   Google Scholar
• Wisker, G., Robinson, G., Trafford, V., Warnes, M., & Creighton, E. (2003). From supervisory dialogues to successful PhDs: Strategies supporting and enabling the learning conversations of staff and students at postgraduate level. Teaching in Higher Education, 8, 383–397.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, L. (2017). Written feedback in intercultural doctoral supervision: A case study. Teaching in Higher Education, 22, 239–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, L. (2018). Students’ voices becoming: Feedback dialogues in intercultural doctoral supervision (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Auckland, New Zealand: University of Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, L., & Grant, B. (2017). International doctoral students’ becoming: A dialogic perspective. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54, 570–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2013). Understanding supervisors’ commentary practices in doctoral research proposal writing: A Hong Kong study. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22, 473–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuo, Q. M. (2000). 《国语》 [The discourses of the states]. Inner Mongolia: Yuanfang Publishing House.
   Google Scholar