Reciprocal learning in service-learning? Measuring bidirectional outcomes of college students and service recipients in tutor-based services in Hong Kong

References

• Asghar, M., & Rowe, N. (2017). Reciprocity and critical reflection as the key to social justice in service learning: A case study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54, 117–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benda, B. B., & Toombs, N. J. (2002). Religiosity and drug use among inmates in boot camp: Testing a theoretical model with reciprocal relationships. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 35, 157–178.
   Google Scholar
• Butin, D. W. (2010). Service-learning in theory and practice: The future of community engagement in higher education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Caspersz, D., & Olaru, D. (2017). The value of service-learning: The student perspective. Studies in Higher Education,42, 685–700.
   Google Scholar
• Celio, C. I., Durlak, J., & Dymnicki, A. (2011). A meta-analysis of the impact of service-learning on students. Journal of Experiential Education, 34, 164–181.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, K., Ng, E., & Chan, C. C. (2016). Empowering students through service-learning in a community psychology course: A case in Hong Kong. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 20, 25–36.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz, N. I., & Giles, D. E. (2000). Where’s the community in service-learning research? Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, (Volume Spec), 1, 28–34.
   Google Scholar
• d’Arlach, L., Sánchez, B., & Feuer, R. (2009). Voices from the community: A case of reciprocity in service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 16, 5–16.
   Google Scholar
• Donahue, D. M., Bowyer, J., & Rosenberg, D. (2003). Learning with and learning from: Reciprocity in service learning in teacher education. Equity & Excellence in Education, 36, 15–27.
   Google Scholar
• Dostilio, L. D., Brackmann, S. M., Edwards, K. E., Harrison, B., Kliewer, B. W., & Clayton, P. H. (2012). Reciprocity: Saying what we mean and meaning what we say. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 19, 17–32.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, D., & Eyler, J. (1998). A service learning research agenda for the next five years. In R. Rhoads & J. Howard (Eds.), Academic service learning, A pedagogy of action and reflection (pp. 65–72). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, D. (1998). Reciprocity in two conditions of service-learning. Educational Gerontology, 24, 411–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, S. E., & Breyfogle, M. L. (2006). Toward a new framework of “server” and “served”: De(and re)constructing reciprocity in service-learning pedagogy. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 18, 27–35.
   Google Scholar
• Hout, M. (1977). A cautionary note on the use of two-stage least squares. Sociological Methods & Research, 5, 335–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby, B. (1996). Service-learning in higher education: Concepts and practices. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, J. C. (1990). Combining service and learning: A resource book for community and public service (Vol. 1). Raleigh, NC: National Society for Internships and Experiential Education.
   Google Scholar
• McGorry, S. Y. (2012). No significant difference in service learning online. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16, 45–54.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, W., & Streb, M. (2001). Building citizenship: How voice in service-learning develops civic values. Social Science Quarterly, 82, 154–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngai, S. S. Y. (2006). Service-learning, personal development, and social commitment: A case study of university students in Hong Kong. Adolescence, 41, 165–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, J. M., Markey, V., & Allen, M. (2007). Evaluating cognitive outcome of service learning in higher education: A meta-analysis. Communication Research Reports, 24, 149–157.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L., & Imperial, M. T. (2001). A decade of service-related research: A map of the field. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30, 462–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M., & Monard, K. (2001). Ayni in the global village: Building relationships of reciprocity through international service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service-Learning, 8, 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, A., & Robby, M. A. (2002). What‘s the value of service learning to the community? Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 9, 27–33.
   Google Scholar
• Stoecker, R. (2016). Liberating service learning and the rest of higher education civic engagement. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University.
   Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, J., & Shehata, A. (2010). Media malaise or a virtuous circle? Exploring the causal relationships between news media exposure, political news attention and political interest. European Journal of Political Research, 49, 575–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach‘s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toncar, M. F., Reid, J. S., Burns, D. J., Anderson, C. E., & Nguyen, H. P. (2006). Uniform assessment of the benefits of service learning: The development, evaluation, and implementation of the SELEB scale. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 14, 223–238.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, J. L. (2012). Does service-learning increase student learning?: A meta-analysis. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 18, 56–61.
   Google Scholar
• Warter, E. H., & Grossman, J. M. (2001). An application of developmental-contextualism to service-learning. In A. Furco & S. H. Billig (Eds.), Service-learning: The essence of the pedagogy (pp. 83–102). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Worrall, L. (2007). Asking the community: A case study of community partner perspectives. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 14, 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Yorio, P. L., & Ye, F. (2012). A meta-analysis on the effects of service-learning on the social, personal, and cognitive outcomes of learning. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11, 9–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar