The impact of feedback form on transactional distance and critical thinking skills in online discussions

References

• Aybek, B., Aslan, S., Dincer, S., & Coskun Arisoy, B. (2015). Critical thinking standards scale for the teacher candidates: Study of validity and reliability. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 21, 25–50. Retrieved from: http://www.kuey.net/index.php/kuey/article/view/kuey.2015.002/782
   Google Scholar
• Baker, P. M., Bricout, J. C., Moon, N. W., Coughlan, B., & Pater, J. (2013). Communities of participation: A comparison of disability and aging identified groups on facebook and linkedIn. Telematics and Informatics, 30, 22–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borup, J., West, R. E., & Thomas, R. (2015). The impact of text versus video communication on instructor feedback in blended courses. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63, 161–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S. M. (2008). How to give effective feedback to your students. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer, N., Besselink, E., & Oosterheert, I. (2017). The power of video feedback with structured viewing guides. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 60–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerdà, F. L., & Planas, N. C. (2011). Facebook’s potential for collaborative e-learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 8, 197–210.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, N. S., Wei, C. W., Wu, K. T., & Uden, L. (2009). Effects of high level prompts and peer assessment on online learners’ reflection levels. Computers & Education, 52, 283–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Kinshuk, & Chen, N. S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? Computers & Education, 79, 16–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching, Y. H., & Hsu, Y. C. (2013). Peer feedback to facilitate project-based learning in an online environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14, 258–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crook, A., Mauchline, A., Maw, S., Lawson, C., Drinkwater, R., Lundqvist, K., … Park, J. (2012). The use of video technology for providing feedback to students: Can it enhance the feedback experience for staff and students? Computers & Education, 58, 386–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, L., & Tavares, N. J. (2013). From moodle to facebook: Exploring students‘ motivation and experiences in online communities. Computers & Education, 68, 167–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, A., & Scriven, M. (1997). Critical thinking: Its definition and assessment. Norwich, UK: Centre for Research in Critical Thinking.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperly, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, M., & Phillips, M. (2015). Video-based feedback on student assessment: Scarily personal. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31, 51–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heo, M., & Toomey, N. (2016). Supporting sustained willingness to share knowledge with visual feedback. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 388–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16, 235–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, X., Chandra, A., DePaolo, C. A., & Simmons, L. L. (2015). Understanding transactional distance in web‐based learning environments: An empirical study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47, 734–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, S. T. A. (2016). Enhancing feedback provision through multimodal video technology. Computers & Education, 98, 90–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. M., & Cooke, A. (2016). Self-regulation of learning and preference for written versus audio-recorded feedback by distance education students. Distance Education, 37, 107–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G. (2019). Exploring the role of Facebook adoption and virtual environment loneliness on knowledge sharing behaviors in a Facebook learning community. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 1699–1714. https://link.springer.com/journal/10639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G., & Keser, H. (2016). The impact of reflective thinking activities in e-learning: A critical review of the empirical research. Computers & Education, 95, 163–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A. (2015). Facebook as learning platform: Argumentation superhighway or dead-end street? Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 621–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinknecht, M., & Gröschner, A. (2016). Fostering preservice teachers’ noticing with structured video feedback: Results of an online-and video-based intervention study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 45–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazman, S. G., & Usluel, Y. K. (2010). Modelling educational usage of facebook. Computers & Education, 55, 444–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education: A systems view of online learning. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Narciss, S., & Huth, K. (2004). How to design informative tutoring feedback for multimedia learning. In H. M. Niegemann, D. Leutner, & R. Brunken (Eds.), Instructional design for multimedia learning (pp. 181–195). Munster, NY: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2007). Critical thinking competency standards. Dillon Beach, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
   Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tezbaşaran, A. (1996). Likert-type scale development guide. Ankara: Psychologists Association Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, R. A., West, R. E., & Borup, J. (2017). An analysis of instructor social presence in online text and asynchronous video feedback comments. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 61–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdugo, D. R., & Belmonte, I. A. (2007). Using digital stories to improve listening comprehension with Spanish young learners of English. Language Learning & Technology, 11, 87–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46, 71–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2007). Knowledge convergence in collaborative learning: Concepts and assessment. Learning and Instruction, 17, 416–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, R., & Keser, H. (2015). The adaptation study of transactional distance Scale. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 30, 91–105. http://www.efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/yonetim/icerik/makaleler/1775-published.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, R., & Keser, H. (2017). The impact of interactive environment and metacognitive support on academic achievement and transactional distance in online learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55, 95–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, A. (2003). Transactional distance in web-based college learning environments: Toward measurement and theory construction. Doctoral dissertation. Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
   Google Scholar