A questionnaire to assess students’ beliefs about peer-feedback

References

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In D. Albarracin, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 173–221). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, W. N., & Warren, M. (1997). Having second thoughts: Student perceptions before and after a peer-assessment exercise. Studies in Higher Education, 22, 233–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. C. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha – an examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gielen, S., Dochy, F., & Onghena, P. (2011). An inventory of peer-assessment diversity. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36, 137–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huisman, B. A. (2018). Peer-feedback on academic writing: Effects on performance and the role of task-design (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1887/65378
   Google Scholar
• Huisman, B. A., Saab, N., van Den Broek, P. W., & van Driel, J. H. (2018). The impact of formative peer-feedback on higher education students’ academic writing. A Meta-Analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44, 863–880. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1545896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulleman, C. S., Durik, A. M., Schweigert, S. B., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2008). Task values achievement goals, and interest: An integrative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 398–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., & Steckelberg, A. L. (2004) Using peer-feedback to enhance student meaningful learning. Association for Educational Communications and Technology (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED485111). Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED485111.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, N., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer-feedback: The learning element of peer-assessment. Teachingin Higher Education, 11, 279–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. (2017). Enhancing feedback in higher education: Students’ attitudes towards online and in-class formative assessment feedback models. Active Learning in Higher Education, 18, 127–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConlogue, T. (2015). Making judgements: Investigating the process of composing and receiving peer-feedback. Studies in Higher Education, 40, 1495–1506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarr, O., & Clifford, A. M. (2013). ‘Just enough to make you take it seriously’: Exploring students’ attitudes towards peer-assessment. Higher Education, 65, 677–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulder, R. A., Pearce, J. M., & Baik, C. (2014). Peer review in higher education: Student perceptions before and after participation. Active Learning in Higher Education, 15, 157–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. J., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in highereducation: A peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39, 102–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers beliefs and educational-research - Cleaning up a messyconstruct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, B., & Major, C. H. (2008). Using reciprocal peer review to help graduate students develop scholarly writing skills. Journal of Faculty Development, 22, 163–169. Retrieved from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nfp/jfd/2008/00000022/00000003/art00001
   Google Scholar
• Price, M., Rust, R., O’Donovan, B., & Handley, K. (2012). Assessment literacy: The foundation for improving student learning. Oxford, UK: The Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development. ISBN: 978-1-87-357683-0.
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito, H., & Fujita, T. (2004). Characteristics and user acceptance of peer rating in EFL writing classrooms. Language Teaching Research, 8, 31–54.
   Google Scholar
• Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Brand-Gruwel, S., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Martens, R. L. (2004). Training teachers in peer-assessment skills: Effects on performance and perceptions. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41, 59–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer-assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48, 20–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gennip, N. A. E., Segers, M. S. R., & Tillema, H. H. (2009). Peer-assessment for learning from a social perspective: The influence of interpersonal variables and structural features. Educational Research Review, 4, 41–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & van Merriënboer, J. (2010). Effective peer-assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 20, 270–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, M. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2006). University students’ perceptions of and attitudes toward (online) peer-assessment. Higher Education, 51, 27–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, M. L., Tsai, C. C., & Chang, C. Y. (2006). Attitudes towards peer-assessment: A comparison of the perspectives of pre‐service and in‐service teachers. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 43, 83–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar