https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6518-4360
References
- Basturkmen, H., East, M., & Bitchener, J. (2012). Supervisors’ on-script feedback comments on drafts of dissertations: Socialising students into the academic discourse community. Teaching in Higher Education, 19, 432–445.
- Bégin, C., & Gérard, L. (2013). The role of supervisors in light of the experience of doctoral students. Policy Features in Education, 11, 267–276.
- Bitzer, E., & Albertyn, R. (2011). Alternative approaches to postgraduate supervision: A planning tool to facilitate supervisory process. South African Journal of Higher Education, 25, 874–888.
- Bøgelund, P. (2015). How supervisors perceive PhD supervision – And how they practice it. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10, 39–55. Retrieved from http://ijds.org/Volume10/IJDSv10p039-055Bogelund0714.pdf
- Bruce, C., & Stoodley, I. (2013). Experiencing higher degree research supervision as teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 226–241.
- Curtin, N., Stewart,A, J., & Ostrove, J. M. (2012). Fostering academic self-concept: Advisor support and sense of belonging among international and domestic graduate students. American Educational Research Journal, (xx), 1–30. doi:10.3102/0002831212446662
- Cusick, A. (2015). Research training as occupational socialization: Doing research and becoming researchers. Asian Social Science, 11, 252–261.
- Keefer, J. (2015). Experiencing doctoral liminality as a conceptual threthold and how supervisors can use it. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52, 17–28.
- Kiley, M. (2015). ‘I didn’t have a clue what they were talking about’: PhD candidates and thoery. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52, 52–63.
- Lee, A. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 3, 267–281.
- Lee, A. (2012). Successful research supervision: Advising students doing research. London and New York: Routledge.
- Makerere University (2016). Directorate of Research and Graduate Training doctoral supervision guidelines. Retrieved from https://rgt.mak.ac.ug/sites/default/files/file-attachments/PhD%20Supervision%20Guidelines%204web.pdf
- Mbarara University of Science and Technology (2017). Postgraduate handbook. Retrieved from http://www.must.ac.ug/sites/default/files/MUST%20Postgraduate%20Handbook%202018.pdf
- Siddiqui, Z., & Jonas-Dwyer, D. (2012). Twelve tips for supervising research students. Medical Teacher, 34, 530–533.
- Toledo, R. S. (2014). What are the most important qualities that PhD supervisors must have to successfully guide a graduate student? Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/post
- Trafford, V., & Leshem, S. (2009). Doctorateness as a threshhold concept. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 305–316.
- Turner, G. (2015). Learning how to supervise: Four journeys. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52, 86–98.
- Uganda Christian University (2018). Academic research manual. Retrieved from ucu.ac.ug/images/Research/UCU- Revised-Research-Manual-April-15-2018.pdf
- Uganda Martyrs University (2018). School of postgraduate studies and research handbook. Retrieved from https://www.umu.ac.ug/wp-content/uploads/2018//SPGSR-Handbook-2018-2019.pd
- Vehviläinen, S., & Lofström, E. (2016). ‘I wish I had a crystal ball’: Discourses and potentials for developing academic supervising. Studies in Higher Education, 41, 508–524.
- Vilkinas, T. (2002). The PhD process: the supervisor as manager. Education & Training, 44, 129–137.
- Wellington, J. (2012). Searching for “doctorateness”. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 1490–1503.
- Zeegers, M., & Barron, D. (2012). Pedagogical concerns in doctoral supervision: A challenge for pedagogy. Quality Assurance in Education, 20, 20–30.