How does online peer feedback improve argumentative essay writing and learning?

References

• Andrews, R. (1995). Teaching and learning argument. London, UK: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, R. (2010). Argumentation in higher education. Improving practice through theory and research. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Andriessen, J. (2006). Arguing to learn. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 443–460). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bacha, N. (2010). Teaching the academic argument in a university EFL environment. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 229–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2009). An educational research course facilitated by online peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 105–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corgan, R., Hammer, V., Margolies, M., & Crossley, C. (2004). Making your online course successful. Business Education Forum, 58, 51–53.
   Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL? (pp. 61–91). Heerlen: Open University of the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Gielen, M., & De Wever, B. (2015). Scripting the role of assessor and assessee in peer assessment in a wiki environment: Impact on peer feedback quality and product improvement. Computers & Education, 88, 370–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huisman, B., Saab, N., van Driel, J., & van den Broek, P. (2018). Peer feedback on academic writing: Undergraduate students’ peer feedback role, peer feedback perceptions and essay performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43, 955–968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, F. (2000). ESL writers and feedback: Giving more autonomy to students. Language Teaching Research, 4, 33–54.
   Google Scholar
• Jurkowski, S. (2018). Do question prompts support students in working with peer feedback? International Journal of Educational Research, 92, 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellogg, R. T., & Whiteford, A. P. (2009). Training advanced writing skills: The case for deliberate practice. Educational Psychologist, 44, 250–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, S., Liu, E., & Yuan, S. (2001). Web-based peer assessment: Feedback for students with various thinking styles. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 420–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mei, W. S. (2006). Creating a contrastive rhetorical stance: Investigating the strategy of problematization in students’ argumentation. Regional Language Centre Journal, 37, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Muncie, J. (2000). Using written feedback in EFL composition classes. ELT Journal, 54, 47–53.
   Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O. (2018). Considering students’ epistemic beliefs to facilitate their argumentative discourse and attitudinal change with a digital dialogue game. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55, 357–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O., Biemans, H., & Mulder, M. (2016). Relations between scripted online peer feedback processes and quality of written argumentative essay. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 20–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., Busstra, M. C., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2011). Differences in learning processes between successful and less successful students in computer supported collaborative learning in the field of human nutrition and health. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 309–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O., & Hatami, J. (2019). The effects of online peer feedback and epistemic beliefs on students’ argumentation-based learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56, 548–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O., Hatami, J., Biemans, H. J. A., van Ginkel, S., & Bayat, A. (2019). Students’ online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing, and content learning: Does gender matter? Interactive Learning Environments. (in press). doi: 10.1080/10494820.2018.1543200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O., Kirschner, P. A., Biemans, H. J. A., & Mulder, M. (2018). Promoting argumentation competence: Extending from first- to second-order scaffolding through adaptive fading. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 153–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O., & Mulder, M. (2017). Design and evaluation of a digital module with guided peer feedback for student learning biotechnology and molecular life sciences, attitudinal change, and satisfaction. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 45, 31–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O., Teasley, S. D., Biemans, H. J. A., Weinberger, A., & Mulder, M. (2013). Facilitating learning in multidisciplinary groups with transactive CSCL scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(2), 189–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2012). Argumentation-based computer supported collaborative learning (ABCSCL): A synthesis of 15 years of research. Educational Research Review, 7, 79–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito, H., & Fujita, T. (2004). Characteristics and user acceptance of peer rating in EFL writing classrooms. Language Teaching Research, 8, 31–54.
   Google Scholar
• Schneer, D. (2014). Rethinking the argumentative essay. TESOL Journal, 5, 619–653.
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory into Practice, 48, 20–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, C. C., Lin, S. S. J., & Yuan, S. M. (2002). Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system. Computers & Education, 38, 241–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valero Haro, A., Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., & Mulder, M. (2019a). First-and second-order scaffolding of argumentation competence and domain-specific knowledge acquisition: A systematic review. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 28, 329–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valero Haro, A., Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., & Mulder, M. (2019b). The effects of an online learning environment with worked examples and peer feedback on students’ argumentative essay writing and domain-specific knowledge acquisition in the field of biotechnology. Journal of Biological Education, 53, 390–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingate, U. (2012). ‘Argument!’ helping students understand what essay writing is about. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 145–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y. F. (2011). A reciprocal peer review system to support college students’ writing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 687–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar