A framework to assess higher education faculty workload in U.S. universities

References

• Allen, J. L., Huggins-Hoyt, K. Y., Holosko, M. J., & Briggs, H. E. (2018). African American social work faculty. Research on Social Work Practice, 28(3), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731517701578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anonymous. (2000). Interpretive comments on the statement of faculty workload. Academe, 86(3), 69–72. https://doi.org/10.2307/40252371
   Google Scholar
• Benedict, M. E., & Benedict, L. (2014). What faculty unions can learn from workload policy in Ohio. Academe, 100(2), 18–84. https://www.aaup.org/article/what-faculty-unions-can-learn-workload-policy-ohio
   Google Scholar
• Blume, A. P. G., & Candela, L. L. (2018). Perceptions of teaching, research, and service expertise, workload, organizational support, and satisfaction among U.S. faculty members’ intent to stay in tier 1 or tier 2 organizations: A structural equation model. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 17(4), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.17.4.1
   Google Scholar
• Branch-Mueller, J. L. (2018). Who is my professor?: Understanding the work life of school library faculty members. Knowledge Quest, 46(5), 40–47. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1182640.pdf
   Google Scholar
• BrckaLorenz, A., Nelson Laird, T. F., Yuhas, B., Strickland, J., & Fassett, K. (2018, April). Faculty types and effective teaching: A cautionary exploration of how faculty spend their time [ Paper presentation]. American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New York, NY. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/dspace/handle/2022/23900
   Google Scholar
• Cloete, N., Bailey, T., Pillay, P., Bunting, I., & Maassen, P. (2011). Universities and economic development in Africa. Wynberg Mews: Centre for Higher Education Transformation.
   Google Scholar
• Colbeck, C. L. (2002). Integration: Evaluating faculty work as a whole. New Directions for Institutional Research, (2002(114), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.45
   Google Scholar
• Ellingson, L. A. (2005, April). Quantifying faculty workload: A proposal. ASC proceedings of the 41st annual conference, Cincinnati, Ohio. http://ascpro0.ascweb.org/archives/cd/2005/2005pro/2005/CER01_400_Ellingson05.htm
   Google Scholar
• Fawzi, H., & Al-Hattami, A. (2017). Faculty production of research papers: Challenges and recommendations. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 7(2), 221–228. https://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_7_No_2_February_2017/29.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Guraya, S. Y., Khoshhal, K. I., Yusoff, M. S. B., & Khan, M. A. (2018). Why research productivity of medical faculty declines after attaining professor rank? A multi-center study from Saudi Arabia, Malaysia and Pakistan. Medical Teacher, 40(sup1), S83–S89. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1465532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagan, J. L., Armbruster, P., & Ballard, R. (2019). Barriers to research among faculty at a health sciences university. American Journal of Educational Research, 7(1), 44–48. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-7-1-7
   Google Scholar
• Hanasono, L. K., Broido, E. M., Yacobucci, M. M., Root, K. V., Peña, S., & O’Neil, D. A. (2019). Secret service: Revealing gender biases in the visibility and value of faculty service. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 12(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesli, V. L., & Lee, J. M. (2011). Faculty research productivity: Why do some of our colleagues publish more than others? PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(2), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511000242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechuga, V. M., & Lechuga, D. C. (2012). Faculty motivation and scholarly work: Self-determination and self-regulation perspectives. Journal of the Professoriate, 6(2), 59–97. https://caarpweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/6-2_Lechuga_p.59v2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mantikayan, J. M., & Abdulgani, M. A. (2018). Factors affecting faculty research productivity: Conclusions from a critical review of the literature. JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research, 31(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.7719/jpair.v31i1.561
   Google Scholar
• McFarland, J., Hussar, B., Zhang, J., Wang, X., Wang, K., Hein, S., Diliberti, M., Forrest Cataldi, E., Bullock Mann, F., & Barmer, A. (2019). The condition of education 2019 (NCES 2019-144). U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2019144
   Google Scholar
• Misra, J., & Lundquist, J. (2016). Making time for research. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2016/01/15/tips-help-midcareer-faculty-members-find-time-research-projects-essay
   Google Scholar
• O’Meara, K., Bennett, J. C., & Neihaus, E. (2016). Left unsaid: The role of work expectations and psychological contracts in faculty careers and departure. The Review of Higher Education, 39(2), 269–297. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2016.0007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Meara, K., Kuvaeva, A., Nyunt, G., Waugaman, C., & Jackson, R. (2017). Asked more often: Gender differences in faculty workload in research universities and the work interactions that shape them. American Educational Research Journal, 54(6), 1154–1186. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217716767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panda, A., & Gupta, R. K. (2014). Making academic research more relevant: A few suggestions. IIMB Management Review, 26(3), 156–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2014.07.008
   Google Scholar
• Parks, D. J., Gabert, M. C., Affleck, S. B., & Kuhr, H. J. (1998, June). Quantifying academic faculty workloads [ Paper presentation]. 1998 Annual Conference, Seattle, Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto, M. K., & Huizinga, D. (2018). Institutional barriers and faculty persistence: Understanding faculty grant-seeking at a predominantly undergraduate institution. The Journal of Faculty Development, 32(1), 65–72.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, S. R., & Umbach, P. D. (2001). Analyzing faculty workload data using multilevel modeling. Research in Higher Education, 42(2), 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026573503271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quimbo, M. A. T., & Sulabo, E. C. (2014). Research productivity and its policy implications in higher education institutions. Studies in Higher Education, 39(10), 1955–1971. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.818639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranieri, M., Raffaghelli, J. E., & Pezzati, F. (2018). Digital resources for faculty development in e-learning: A self-paced approach for professional learning. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/961
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, T. D., De Brey, C., & Dillow, S. A. (2016). Digest of education statistics, 2015. National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2016014
   Google Scholar
• Stupnisky, R. H., Hall, N. C., Daniels, L. M., & Mensah, E. (2017). Testing a model of pretenure faculty members’ teaching and research success: Motivation as a mediator of balance, expectations, and collegiality. The Journal of Higher Education, 88(3), 376–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.1272317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweet, C., Blythe, H., Carpenter, R., & Cecil, T. (2018). Approaching the holy grail of faculty development: Evolving a CTL from a service-oriented organization to a learning-assessment unit. Journal on Centers for Teaching and Learning, 10(1), 45–58. https://openjournal.lib.miamioh.edu/index.php/jctl/article/view/197/0
   Google Scholar
• Teater, B., & Mendoza, N. (2018). Workload of social work academics and factors that contribute to time spent on research. Journal of Social Work Education, 54(2), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2017.1404520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2009). Summary 09-07. Issues in Labor Statistics. U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.bls.gov/opub/btn/archive/where-people-worked-2003-to-2007.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Walters, S., Grover, K. S., Turner, R. C., & Alexander, J. C. (2017). Faculty perceptions related to teaching online: A starting point for designing faculty development initiatives. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18(4), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.340365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, K. (2003). Faculty service roles and the scholarship of engagement [Article]. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 29(5), 1–161. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED476222.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Webber, K. L. (2011). Factors related to faculty research productivity and implications for academic planners. Planning for Higher Education, 39(4), 32–43.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, M., & Plaxton-Moore, S. (2017). Faculty development for advancing community engagement in higher education: Current trends and future directions. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 21(2), 131–165. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1144557.pdf
   Google Scholar
• White, C. S., James, K., Burke, L. A., & Allen, R. S. (2012). What makes a “research star”? Factors influencing the research productivity of business faculty. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61(6), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401211249175
   Google Scholar
• Wood, C., Wofford, M. C., & Hassinger, A. (2018). Acknowledging challenges and embracing innovative instructional practices in response to cultural and linguistic diversity. SAGE Open, 8(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018771110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, J. L., Hilton, A. A., & Nevarez, C. (2016). Faculty of color and white faculty: An analysis of service in colleges of education in the Arizona public university system. Journal of the Professoriate, 8(1), 85–109. https://caarpweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/8-1_Wood_p85.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wynants, S., & Dennis, J. (2018). Professional development in an online context: Opportunities and challenges from the voices of college faculty. Journal of Educators Online, 15(1), 127-139. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO2018.15.1.2
   Google Scholar