References
- Abasi, A. R., & Graves, B. (2008). Academic literacy and plagiarism: Conversations with international graduate students and disciplinary professors. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(4), 221–233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.10.010
- Acedo, F. G., Barroso, C., Casanueva, C., & Galán, J. L. (2006). Co-authorship in management and organisational studies: An empirical and network analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5), 957–983. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00625.x
- Aitchison, C., Catterall, J., Ross, P., & Burgin, S. (2012). ‘Tough love and tears’: Learning doctoral writing in the sciences. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(4), 435–447. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.559195
- Aitchison, C., & Guerin, C. (Eds.). (2014). Writing groups for doctoral education and beyond: Innovations in practice and theory. Routledge.
- All European Academies (ALLEA) (2017). European code of conduct for research integrity. Revised edition. http://www.allea.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/ALLEA-European-Code-of-Conduct-for-Research-Integrity-2017.pdf.
- Angelil-Carter, S. (2000). Stolen language?: Plagiarism in writing. Pearson Education.
- Bazerman, C., Keranen, N., & Encinas, F. (2012). Facilitated immersion at a distance in second language scientific writing. In M. Castelló & C. Donahue (Eds.), University writing: Selves and texts in academic societies (pp. 235–248). Brill.
- Bitchener, J., Basturkmen, H., & East, M. (2010). The focus of supervisor written feedback to thesis/dissertation students. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 79–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2010/2/119201
- Burrough-Boenish, J. (2003). Shapers of published NNS research articles. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 223–243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00037-7
- Caffarella, R., & Barnett, B. (2000). Teaching doctoral students to become scholarly writers: The importance of giving and receiving critiques. Studies in Higher Education, 25(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/030750700116000
- Carlino, P. (2012). Helping doctoral students of education to face writing and emotional challenges in identity transition. In M. Castelló & C. Donahue (Eds.), University writing: Selves and texts in academic societies (pp. 217–234). Brill.
- Castelló, M., Bañales, G., Iñesta, A., & Vega, N. (2009a). Writing academic texts: Organization and structure, authorial voice and intertextuality. Graduate School of Psychology. Blanquerna. Ramon Llull University. http://www.sinte.es/joomla_cast/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=22&Itemid=47.
- Castelló, M., & Donahue, C. (Eds.). (2012). University writing: Selves and texts in academic societies (Vol. 24). Brill. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/9781780523873
- Castelló, M., Iñesta, A., & Corcelles, M. (2013). Learning to write a research article: Ph. D. students’ transitions toward disciplinary writing regulation. Research in the Teaching of English, 47(4), 442–477. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24397847
- Castelló, M., Iñesta, A., & Monereo, C. (2009b). Towards self-regulated academic writing: An exploratory study with graduate students in a situated learning environment. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7(3), 1107–1130. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=293121984009
- Castelló, M., McAlpine, L., & Pyhältö, K. (2017). Spanish and UK post-PhD researchers: Writing perceptions, well-being and productivity. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(6), 1108–1122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1296412
- Cerrato-Lara, M., Castelló, M., Garcia Velazquez, R., & Lonka, K. (2017). Validation of the writing process questionnaire in two Hispanic populations. Journal of Writing Research, 9(2), 151–171. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2017.09.02.03
- Conn, V. S., Ward, S., Herrick, L., Topp, R., Alexander, G. L., Anderson, C. M., … Georgesen, S. (2015). Managing opportunities and challenges of co-authorship. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 37(2), 134–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945914532722
- Cotterall, S. (2011). Doctoral students writing: Where’s the pedagogy? Teaching in Higher Education, 16(4), 413–425. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.560381
- Cutas, D., & Shaw, D. (2015). Writers blocked: On the wrongs of research co-authorship and some possible strategies for improvement. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(5), 1315–1329. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9606-0
- Dressen-Hammouda, D. (2008). From novice to disciplinary expert: Disciplinary identity and genre mastery. English for Specific Purposes, 27(2), 233–252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.07.006
- East, J. (2010). Judging plagiarism: A problem of morality and convention. Higher Education, 59(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9234-9
- Emerson, L. (2012). The life cycle of the scientific writer: An investigation of the senior academic scientist as writer in Australasian universities. In C. Bazerman, C. Dean, J. Early, K. Lunsford, S. Null, P. Rogers&, & A. Stansell (Eds.), International advances in writing research: Cultures, places, measures. Perspectives on writing (pp. 355–420). The WAC Clearinghouse; Parlor Press.
- Finnish National Board on Research Integrity (2018). Agreeing on authorship. Recommendation for research publications. Retrieved June 24, 2019, Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK 6/2019, from https://www.tenk.fi/en/tenk-guidelines
- Florence, M. K., & Yore, L. D. (2004). Learning to write like a scientist: Co-authoring as an enculturation task. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 637–668. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20015
- Gallego, L., Castelló, M., & Badia, A. (2016). Faculty feelings as writers: Relationship with writing genres, perceived competences, and values associated to writing. Higher Education, 71(5), 719–734. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9933-3
- González-Ocampo, G., & Castelló, M. (2018). Writing in doctoral programs: Examining supervisors’ perspectives. Higher Education, 76(3), 387–401. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0214-1
- Guerin, C., Walker, R., Aitchison, C., Mattarozzi Laming, M., Chatterjee Padmanabhan, M., & James, B. (2017). Doctoral supervisor development in Australian universities: Preparing research supervisors to teach writing. Journal of Academic Language &learning, 11(1), 88–103. https://journal.aall.org.au/index.php/jall/article/download/446/275
- Hakkarainen, K., Hytönen, K., Lonka, K., & Makkonen, J. (2014). How does collaborative authoring in doctoral programs socially shape practices of academic excellence? Talent Development & Excellence , 6(1), 11–29.
- Hayes, N., & Introna, L. D. (2005). Cultural values, plagiarism, and fairness: When plagiarism gets in the way of learning. Ethics &Behavior, 15(3), 213–231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327019eb1503_2
- Henriksen, D. (2016). The rise in co-authorship in the social sciences (1980–2013). Scientometrics, 107(2), 455–476. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1849-x
- ICMJE International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2018). ICMJE. Recommendations. http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/
- Iñesta, A., & Castelló, M. (2012). Towards an integrative unit of analysis: Regulation episodes in expert research article writing. In C. Bazerman, C. Dean, J. Early, K. Lunsford, S. Null, P. Rogers, & A. Stansell (Eds.), International advances in writing research: Cultures, places, measures. perspectives on writing (pp. 421–448). The WAC Clearinghouse; Parlor Press.
- Inouye, K., & McAlpine, L. (2019). Developing academic identity: A review of the literature on doctoral writing and feedback. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 14, 1–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.28945/4168
- Ivanic, R. (2005). The discoursal construction of writer identity. In R. Beach, J. Green, M. Kamil, & T. Shanahan (Eds.), Multidisciplinary perspectives on literacy research (pp. 391–416). Hampton Press.
- James, N., & Lokhtina, I. (2018). Feeling on the periphery? The challenge of supporting academic development and identity through communities of practice. Studies in the Education of Adults, 50(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2018.1520561
- Johansen, B. T., Olsen, R. M., Øverby, N. C., Garred, R., & Enoksen, E. (2019). Team supervision of doctoral students: A qualitative inquiry. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 14, 69–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.28945/4177
- Kamler, B. (2008). Rethinking doctoral publication practices: Writing from and beyond the thesis. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 283–294. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802049236
- Kamler, B., & Thomson, P. (2014). Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for supervision. Routledge.
- Kitchener, K. S. (1985). Ethical principles and ethical decisions in student affairs. In H. J. Canon & R. D. Brown (Eds.), New directions for student services: Applied ethics in student services (pp. 17–29). Jossey-Bass.
- Kruse, O., Chitez, M., Rodriguez, B., & Castelló, M. (2016). Exploring European writing cultures. Country reports on genres, writing practices and languages used in European higher education. ZHAW. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/55329646.pdf.
- Leane, E., Fletcher, L., & Garg, S. (2019). Co-authorship trends in English literary studies, 1995–2015. Studies in Higher Education, 44(4), 786–798. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1405256
- Lee, A., & Murray, R. (2015). Supervising writing: Helping postgraduate students develop as researchers. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(5), 558–570. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.866329
- Löfström, E., Huotari, E., & Kupila, P. (2017). Conceptions of plagiarism and problems in academic writing in a changing landscape of external regulation. Journal of Academic Ethics, 15(3), 277–292. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-017-9285-y
- Löfström, E., & Pyhältö, K. (2012). The supervisory relationship as an arena for ethical problem-solving. Education Research International, article ID961505, 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/961505
- Löfström, E., & Pyhältö, K. (2014). Ethical issues in Doctoral supervision - The perspectives of PhD students in the natural and behavioural sciences. Ethics & Behavior, 24(3), 195–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2013.830574
- Löfström, E., & Pyhältö, K. (2015). “I don’t even have time to be their friend!” Ethical dilemmas in PhD supervision in hard sciences. International Journal of Science Education, 37(16), 2721–2739. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1104424
- Löfström, E., Trotman, T., Furnari, M., & Shephard, K. (2015). Who teaches academic integrity and how do they do it? Higher Education, 69(3), 435–448. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9784-3
- Lokhtina, I. (2018). Gaining legitimacy: Mentoring as an avenue to navigate the transition into a new academic workplace. Journal for the Study of Education and Development/Infancia Y Aprendizaje, 41(3), 581–618. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2018.1494400
- Lonka, K., Chow, A., Keskinen, J., Hakkarainen, K., Sandström, N., & Pyhältö, K. (2014). How to measure PhD. students’ conceptions of academic writing–and are they related to well-being? Journal of Writing Research, 5(3), 245–269. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2014.05.03.1
- Macfarlane, B. (2017). The ethics of multiple authorship: Power, performativity and the gift economy. Studies in Higher Education, 42(7), 1194–1210. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1085009
- Maher, M. A., Feldon, D. F., Timmerman, B. E., & Chao, J. (2014). Faculty perceptions of common challenges encountered by novice doctoral writers. Higher Education Research and Development, 33(4), 699–711. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.863850
- McAlpine, L., & Amundsen, C. (2009, July). Identity and agency: Pleasures and collegiality among the challenges of the doctoral journey. Studies in Continuing Education, 32(2), 109–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01580370902927378
- McGrail, M. R., Rickard, C. M., & Jones, R. (2006). Publish or perish: A systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates. Higher Education Research and Development, 25(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500453053
- Nelson, N., & Castelló, M. (2012). Academic writing and authorial voice. In M. Castelló & C. Donahue (Eds.), University writing: Selves and texts in academic societies (pp. 33–51). Brill.
- Paré, A. (2011). Speaking of writing: Supervisory feedback and the dissertation. In L. McAlpine & C. Amundsen (Eds.), Doctoral education: Research-based strategies for doctoral students, supervisors and administrators (pp. 59–74). Springer.
- Pecorari, D. (2003). Good and original: Plagiarism and patchwriting in academic second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(4), 317–345. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2003.08.004
- Prior, P. (2013). Writing/disciplinarity: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy. Routledge.
- Russell, D. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written communication. Sage Journals, 14(4), 504–554. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088397014004004
- Selbach, H. V., Motta-Roth, D., & Schmidt, A. P. C. (2018). Academic literacies: Appraisal and social sanction about authorship and scientific integrity. Revista Brasileira De Linguística Aplicada[online], 18(4), 703–736. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-6398201812991
- Smith, E. A. (2017). Theoretical foundation for the ethical distribution of authorship in multidisciplinary publications. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 27(3), 371–411. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2017.0032
- Swales, M. A. (2009). Dialectical behaviour therapy: Description, research and future directions. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 5(2), 164–177. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100878
- Tardy, C. (2003). Genre system view of the funding of academic research. Written Communication, 20(1), 7–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088303253569
- Valentine, K. (2006). Plagiarism as literacy practice: Recognizing and rethinking ethical binaries. College Composition and Communication, 58(1), 89–109. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20456924