Assessing the effect of Massive Open Online Courses as remedial courses in higher education

References

• Al-Imarah, A. A., & Shields, R. (2019). MOOCs, disruptive innovation and the future of higher education: A conceptual analysis. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(3), 258–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2018.1443828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alpert, W. T., Couch, K. A., & Harmon, O. R. (2016). A randomized assessment of online learning. American Economic Review, 106(5), 378–382. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20161057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2014). (Dis) organization and Success in an Economics MOOC. American Economic Review, 104(5), 514–518. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.5.514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S. O., & Ichino, A. (2002). Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. The Stata Journal, 2(4), 358–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0200200403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 87–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billington, P. J., & Fronmueller, M. P. (2013). MOOCs and the future of higher education. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 13(3/4), 36. Retrieved from http://www.na-businesspress.com/JHETP/BillingtonPJ_Web13_3__4_.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, W. G., Chingos, M. M., Lack, K. A., & Nygren, T. I. (2014). Interactive learning online at public universities: Evidence from a six‐campus randomized trial. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(1), 94–111. h ttps://d oi.o rg/1 0.1002/pam.21728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bralić, A., & Divjak, B. (2018). Use of moocs in traditional classroom: Blended learning approach. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 21(1), 1–9. Retrieved from https://old.eurodl.org/materials/special/2018/Oldenburg_036_Bralic_Divjak.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bruff, D. O., Fisher, D. H., McEwen, K. E., & Smith, B. E. (2013). Wrapping a MOOC: Student perceptions of an experiment in blended learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 187. Retrieved from https://my.vanderbilt.edu/douglasfisher/files/2013/06/JOLTPaperFinal6-9-2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1), 31–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Freitas, S. I., Morgan, J., & Gibson, D. (2015). Will MOOCs transform learning and teaching in higher education? Engagement and course retention in online learning provision. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 455–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figlio, D., Rush, M., & Yin, L. (2013). Is it live or is it internet? Experimental estimates of the effects of online instruction on student learning. Journal of Labor Economics, 31(4), 763–784. https://doi.org/10.1086/669930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregori, E. B., Zhang, J., Galván-Fernández, C., & de Asís Fernández-navarro, F. (2018). Learner support in MOOCs: Identifying variables linked to completion. Computers & Education, 122, 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, R., Chingos, M., Mulhern, C., & Spies, R. (2014). Interactive online learning on campus: Testing MOOCs and other platforms in hybrid formats in the University System of Maryland. Ithaka S+ R.
   Google Scholar
• Hoxby, C. M. (2014). The economics of online postsecondary education: MOOCs, nonselective education, and highly selective education. American Economic Review, 104(5), 528–533. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.5.528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israel, M. J. (2015). Effectiveness of integrating MOOCs in traditional classrooms for undergraduate students. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(5), 102–118. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i5.2222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krieg, J. M., & Henson, S. E. (2016). The educational impact of online learning: How do university students perform in subsequent courses? Education Finance and Policy, 11(4), 426–448. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappano, L. (2012, November 2). The year of the MOOC. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/massive-open-online-courses-are-multiplying-at-a-rapid-pace.html
   Google Scholar
• Perna, L. W., Ruby, A., Boruch, R. F., Wang, N., Scull, J., Ahmad, S., & Evans, C. (2014). Moving through MOOCs: Understanding the progression of users in massive open online courses. Educational Researcher, 43(9), 421–432. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14562423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, D. (2018, June 3) The second wave of MOOC hype is here and it’s online degrees. https://www.class-central.com/report/second-wave-of-mooc-hype/
   Google Scholar
• Wisneski, J. E., Ozogul, G., & Bichelmeyer, B. A. (2017). Investigating the impact of learning environments on undergraduate students’ academic performance in a prerequisite and post-requisite course sequence. The Internet and Higher Education, 32, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar