Using metacognition to promote active learning in large business management classes

References

• Alsina, Á., Ayllón, S., Colomer, J., Fernández-Peña, R., Fullana, J., Pallisera, M., Pérez-Burriel, M., & Serra, L. (2017). Improving and evaluating reflective narratives: A rubric for higher education students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 148–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amalia, Q., Hartono, Y., & Indaryanti, I. (2019). Students’ critical thinking skills in modeling based learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1166(1), 012017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1166/1/012017
   Google Scholar
• Ballen, C. J., Aguillon, S. M., Awwad, A., Bjune, A. E., Challou, D., Drake, A. G., ., .Cotner, S., Ellozy, A., Ferry, V. E., Goldberg, E. E., Harcombe, W., Jensen, S., Jørgensen, C., Koth, Z., McGaugh, S., Mitry, C., Mosher, B., Mostafa, H., Petipas, R. H., Soneral, P. A. G., & Cotner, S. (2019). Smaller classes promote equitable student participation in STEM. BioScience, 69(8), 669–680. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, M. L. (2017). Encouraging college student active engagement in learning: Student response methods and anonymity. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(6), 621–632. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrows, H. S. (1986). A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Medical Education, 20(6), 481–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1986.tb01386.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessant, S., Bailey, P., Robinson, Z., Tomkinson, C. B., Tomkinson, R., Ormerod, R. M., & Boast, R. (2013). Problem-based learning: A case study of sustainability education a toolkit for university educators. Keele University. https://www.keele.ac.uk/media/keeleuniversity/group/hybridpbl/PBL_ESD_Case%20Study_Bessant,%20et%20al.%202013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bhat, S., Raju, R., Bhat, S., & D’souza, R. (2020). Enhancing the teaching-learning process through collaborative learning. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 33( Special Issue), 185–191. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2020/v33i0/150140
   Google Scholar
• Biasutti, M., & Frate, S. (2018). Group metacognition in online collaborative learning: Validity and reliability of the group metacognition scale (GMS). Educational Technology Research and Development., 66(6), 1321–1338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9583-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent, J., Panadero, E., & Boud, D. (2018). Implementing summative assessment with a formative flavour: A case study in a large class. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(2), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1343455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cakici, D. (2018). Metacognitive awareness and critical thinking abilities of pre-service EFL teachers. Journal of Education and Learning., 7(5), 116–129. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n5p116
   Google Scholar
• Cho, Y. S., & Linderman, K. (2019). Metacognition-based process improvement practices. International Journal of Production Economics., 211, 132–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.01.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE Publications. Google Books: bit.ly/3oyaOFq.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, B. K., & Bird, R. (2019). Attention! Student voice: Providing students with digital learning materials before scheduled lectures improves learning experience. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 18(3), 1–9. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1223781
   Google Scholar
• De Backer, L., Van Keer, H., & Valcke, M. (2015). Exploring evolutions in reciprocal peer tutoring groups’ socially shared metacognitive regulation and identifying its metacognitive correlates. Learning and Instruction, 38, 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LEARNINSTRUC.2015.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, C. P., Boswell, A., & Elliott, M. A. (2015). An evaluation of critical thinking competencies in business settings. Journal of Education for Business, 90(5), 260–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2015.1038978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ElZomor, M., Mann, C., Doten-Snitker, K., Parrish, K., & Chester, M. (2018). Leveraging vertically integrated courses and problem-based learning to improve students’ performance and skills. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 144(4), 04018009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, A., Taylor, L. K., & Lemke, M. R. (2019). Chapter 6: Task analysis. In M. Beth (Ed.), Applied human factors in medical device design (pp. 63–81). Academic Press. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816163-0.00006-2
   Google Scholar
• Grant, R. M., & Baden-Fuller, C. (2018). How to develop strategic management competency: Reconsidering the learning goals and knowledge requirements of the core strategy course. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 17(3), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2017.0126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, K., & Koncz, A. (2017). The key attributes employers seek on students’ resumes. National Association of Colleges and Employers. Retrieved from: https://www.naceweb.org/about-us/press/2017/the-key-attributes-employers-seek-on-students-resumes/
   Google Scholar
• Jain, M., Beniwal, R., Ghosh, A., Grover, T., & Tyagi, U. (2019). Classifying question papers with Bloom’s Taxonomy using machine learning techniques. In: Singh M., Gupta P., Tyagi V., Flusser J., Ören T., Kashyap R. (eds.), Advances in Computing and Data Sciences. ICACDS 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science (pp. 399–408). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9942-8_38
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H., & Hung, W. (2008). All problems are not equal: Implications for pbl. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 2(2), 10. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1080
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H. J., Yi, P., & Hong, J. I. (2020). Students’ academic use of mobile technology and higher-order thinking skills: The role of active engagement. Education Sciences, 10(3), 47. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10030047
   Google Scholar
• Magno, C. (2010). The role of metacognitive skills in developing critical thinking. Metacognition and Learning, 5(2), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-010-9054-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matawali, A., Bakri, S. N. S., Jumat, N. R., Ismail, I. H., Arshad, S. E., & Din, W. A. (2019). The preliminary study on inverted problem-based learning in biology among science foundation students. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(4), 713–718. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i4.20294
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. (2017). Enhancing feedback in higher education: Students’ attitudes towards online and in-class formative assessment feedback models. Active Learning in Higher Education, 18(2), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417707615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, S., & McNamara, A. (2019). Authentic simulated startups: Bringing the real world into the classroom. Journal of Education for Business, 94(4), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2018.1496897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, J., Veenman, M. V. J., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2006). Metacognitive activities in text-studying and problem-solving: Development of a taxonomy. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(3), 209–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610500479991
   Google Scholar
• Mizokami, S. (2018). Deep active learning from the perspective of active learning theory. In K. Matsushita (Ed.), Deep active learning (pp. 79–91). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5660-4_5
   Google Scholar
• Mohamadi, Z. (2013). Determining the difficulty level of listening tasks. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(6), 987–994. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.6.987-994
   Google Scholar
• Mozahem, N. A., & Ghanem, C. M. (2018). The University is an organization: Teaching organizational behavior by relying on students’ university experience. Management Teaching Review, 3(4), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/2379298118760220
   Google Scholar
• Ohyama, T. (2019). Statistical inference of agreement coefficient between two raters with binary outcomes. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 49(10), 2529–2539. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2019.1576894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patchan, M. M., Schunn, C. D., & Clark, R. J. (2018). Accountability in peer assessment: Examining the effects of reviewing grades on peer ratings and peer feedback. Studies in Higher Education, 43(12), 2263–2278. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1320374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priem, R. L. (2018). Toward becoming a complete teacher of strategic management. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 17(3), 374–388. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2017.0237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puustinen, M., & Pulkkinen, L. (2001). Models of self-regulated learning: A review. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45(3), 269–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830120074206
   Google Scholar
• Raper, J. (2007). Design constraints on operational LBS. In G. Gartner, W. Cartwright, & M. P. Peterson (Eds.), Location based services and telecartography. Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography (pp. 13–25). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36728-4_2
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, M., Díaz, I., Gonzalez, E. J., & González-Miquel, M. (2018). Motivational active learning: An integrated approach to teaching and learning process control. Education for Chemical Engineers, 24, 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2018.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santiago-Delefosse, M., Gavin, A., Bruchez, C., Roux, P., & Stephen, S. L. (2016). Quality of qualitative research in the health sciences: Analysis of the common criteria present in 58 assessment guidelines by expert users. Social Science & Medicine, 148, 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2016). Education 2030: Incheon declaration and framework for action for the implementation of sustainable development goal 4: Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all. Report, 83. ED-2016/WS/28. Retrieved from: http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/education-2030-incheon-framework-for-action-implementation-of-sdg4-2016-en_2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Varela, O. E. (2019). Teaching core soft skills into business curriculum: Can we teach longitudinally? Journal of Education for Business, 95(3), 180–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2019.1627992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, W. R., Watson, S. L., Magar, S. T., & Tay, L. (2020). Comparing attitudinal learning of large enrolment active learning and lecture classes. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1711440
   Google Scholar
• Zaar, S., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijselaers, W. (2019). How business students think about leadership: A qualitative study on leader identity and meaning-making. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 19(2), 168–191. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2017.0290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Q., & Carless, D. (2018). Dialogue within peer feedback processes: Clarification and negotiation of meaning. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(4), 883–897. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1446417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar