The impacts of constructivist learning design and learning analytics on students’ engagement and self-regulation

References

• Abubakar, A., Abubakar, Y., & Itse, J. B. (2017). Students’ engagement in relationship to academic performance. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 8(1), 5–9. https://www.jesoc.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/JESOC8_201.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Akçapınar, G., Altun, A., & Aşkar, P. (2019). Using learning analytics to develop early-warning system for at-risk students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0172-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banihashem, S. K. (2020). Development and validation of learning environment design model based on the constructivism theory in higher education with a focus on learning analytics [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Allameh Tabataba’i University.
   Google Scholar
• Banihashem, S. K., Aliabadi, K., Pourroostaei Ardakani, S., Delavar, A., & Nili Ahmadabadi, M. R. (2018). Learning analytics: A systematic literature review. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 9(2), 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/ijvlms.63024
   Google Scholar
• Banihashem, S. K., Aliabadi, K., Pourroostaei Ardakani, S., Nili Ahmadabadi, M. R., & Delavar, A. (2019). Investigation on the role of learning theory in learning analytics. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 10(4), 14-27. https://dx.doi.org/10.30476/ijvlms.2019.84294.1001
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. M., Miller, W. R., & Lawendowski, L. A. (1999). The self-regulation questionnaire. In L. VandeCreek & T. L. Jackson (Eds.), Innovations in clinical practice: A source book (Vol. 17, pp. 281–292). Professional Resource Press/Professional Resource Exchange. h ttps://p sycnet.apa.org/record/1 999-02283-018
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Colorado Springs, Co, 80918. https://media.bscs.org/bscsmw/5es/bscs_5e_full_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Calonge, D. S., Riggs, K. M., Shah, M. A., & Cavanagh, T. A. 2019. Fostering multiple levels of engagement in higher education environments. In K. Walters & P. Henry Eds., Using learning analytics to improve engagement, learning, and design of massive open online courses, 76–107. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7470-5.ch004.
   Google Scholar
• Chaubey, A., & Bhattacharya, B. (2015). Learning management system in higher education. IJSTE-International Journal of Science Technology & Engineering, 2(3), 158–162. https://ijste.org/Article.php?manuscript=IJSTEV2I3050
   Google Scholar
• Chen, B., Chang, Y. H., Ouyang, F., & Zhou, W. (2018). Fostering student engagement in online discussion through social learning analytics. The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, M. H., & Shen, D. (2013). Self-regulation in online learning. Distance Education, 34(3), 290–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Rogers, T., & Gasevic, D. (2016). Learning analytics should not promote one size fits all: The effects of instructional conditions in predicting academic success. The Internet and Higher Education, 28, 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, N. (2020). Pervasive learning analytics for fostering learners’ self-regulation [doctoral dissertation, ludwig maximilian university of munich]. Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich. https://edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de/26428/
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, D., & Hodson, J. (1998). From constructivism to social constructivism: A vygotskian perspective on teaching and learning science. School Science Review, 79(289), 33–41.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, W., Schmeichel, B. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Executive functions and self-regulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(3), 174–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, W., Nguyen, Q., Zhang, J., Mavrikis, M., & Rienties, B. (2019). Learning analytics for learning design in online distance learning. Distance Education, 40(3), 309–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2019.1637716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, X., Ng, J., Tsang, K. K., & Chu, S. K. (2020). Integrating mobile learning to learning management system in community college. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 44(10–12), 722–737. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2019.1640146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ifenthaler, D., Gibson, D., & Dobozy, E. (2018). Informing learning design through analytics: Applying network graph analysis. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(2), 117-132. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3767
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 215–239). University Park: Pennsylvania State University.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, P., Everington, L., Kelm, K., Reid, I., & Watkins, F. (2017). Understanding student engagement in online learning environments: The role of reflexivity. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(1), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9484-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalenda, J., & Vávrová, S. (2016). Self-regulated learning in students of helping professions. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 282–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.086
   Google Scholar
• Khalifeh, G., Noroozi, O., Farrokhnia, M., & Talaee, E. (2020). Higher education students’ perceived readiness for computer-supported collaborative learning’, multimodal technologies and interaction. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 4(2), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti4020011
   Google Scholar
• Kim, D., Yoon, M., Jo, I. H., & Branch, R. M. (2018). Learning analytics to support self-regulated learning in asynchronous online courses: A case study at a women’s university in South Korea. Computers & Education, 127, 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, S., Buckingham Shum, S., & Littleton, K. (2014). Epistemology, assessment, pedagogy: Where learning meets analytics in the middle space. Journal of Learning Analytics, 1(2), 23–47. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2014.12.3
   Google Scholar
• Liu, C., Lim, R., Taylor, S., & Calvo, R. A. (2019). Students’ behavioral engagement in reviewing their tele-consultation feedback within an online clinical communication skills platform. Computers in Human Behavior, 94, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mameli, C., & Passini, S. (2017). Measuring four-dimensional engagement in school: A validation of the student engagement scale and of the agentic engagement scale. TPM: Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 24(4), 423–436. http://dx.doi.org/10.4473/TPM24.4.4
   Google Scholar
• Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205–222. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardo, A., Han, F., & Ellis, R. A. (2016). Combining university student self-regulated learning indicators and engagement with online learning events to predict academic performance. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 10(1), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2016.2639508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardo, A., Jovanovic, J., Dawson, S., Gašević, D., & Mirriahi, N. (2019). Using learning analytics to scale the provision of personalised feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persico, D., & Pozzi, F. (2015). Informing learning design with learning analytics to improve teacher inquiry. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 230–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roll, I., & Winne, P. H. (2015). Understanding, evaluating, and supporting self-regulated learning using learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 2(1), 7–12. h ttps://d oi.o rg/1 0.18608/jla.2015.21.2
   Google Scholar
• Russell, D., & Warner, R. (2017). Motivational intermediaries of self-regulation among university students. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 9(3), 448–464. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-08-2015-0062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toro-Troconis, M., Alexander, J., & Frutos-Perez, M. (2019). Assessing student engagement in online programmes: Using learning design and learning analytics. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(6), 171–183. h ttps://d oi.o rg/1 0.5430/ijhe.v 8n6p171
   Google Scholar
• Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. The Higher Education Academy, 11(1), 1–15. https://pure.hud.ac.uk/en/publications/student-engagement-literature-review
   Google Scholar
• Viberg, O., Khalil, M., & Baars, M. (2020, March 23-27). Self-regulated learning and learning analytics in online learning environments: A review of empirical research. In In proceedings of the tenth international conference on learning analytics & knowledge (pp. 524–533). ACM, New York, United States. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375483.
   Google Scholar
• Vytasek, J. M., Patzak, A., & Winne, P. H. 2020. Analytics for student engagement. In M. Virvou, E. Alepis, & G. A. Tsihrintzis Eds., Machine Learning Paradigms, 23–48. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13743-4_3.
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, K. J., Dimitriadis, Y., Bradford, A., & Linn, M. C. (2020, March 23-27). From theory to action: Developing and evaluating learning analytics for learning design. In In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (pp. 569–578). https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375540. ACM, New York, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H. (2017). Learning analytics for self-regulated learning. In C. Lang, G. Siemens, & A. Wise, (Eds.), Handbook of learning analytics (pp. 241–249). Society for Laening Analytics Research (SOLAR). https://doi.org/10.18608/hla17.021
   Google Scholar
• Wise, A. F. (2014, March 24-28). Designing pedagogical interventions to support student use of learning analytics. In In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge (pp. 203–211). ACM, New York, United States. https://doi.org/10.1145/2567574.2567588.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, J., Baars, M., Davis, D., Van Der Zee, T., Houben, G. J., & Paas, F. (2019). Supporting self-regulated learning in online learning environments and MOOCs: A systematic review. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(4–5), 356–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1543084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar