Effects of innovative pedagogies on academic achievement and development of 21st-century skills of taxation students in colleges of education

References

• Abdi, A. (2014). The effect of inquiry-based learning method on students’ academic achievement in science course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(1), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2014.020104
   Google Scholar
• Akiri, A. A., & Ugborugbo, N. M. (2009). Teachers’ effectiveness and students’ academic performance in public secondary schools in Delta State, Nigeria. Studies on Home Communication Sciences, 3(2), 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09737189.2009.11885284
   Google Scholar
• Akpulluku, A., & Gunay, F. Y. (2011). The effect of inquiry-based learning environment in science and technology course on the students’ academic achievements. Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences. 1308-8971.
   Google Scholar
• Applied Education Systems. (2020). What are 21st-century skills? https://www.aeseducation.com/career-readiness/what-are-21st-century-skills.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, J. E., & Francis, A. L. (2012). Using higher order thinking questions to foster critical thinking: A classroom study. Educational Psychology, 32(2), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2011.638619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benge, M., & Harder, A. (2008). Creating interest in learners. University of Florida IFAS Extension. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/wc074
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1971). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, J. L., & Underwood, J. C. E. (2000). Evidence-based learning: A lack of evidence-letter to the editor. Medical Teacher, 22(2), 136–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590078544
   Google Scholar
• Butler, D., Leahy, M., Hallissy, M., Hurley, J., Panton, K., & Eskelinen, S (2017). 21st-century learning design. Microsoft Education Center Retrieved from: https://preview.education.microsoft.com
   Google Scholar
• Butler, D., Leahy, M., Hallissy, M., Hurley, J., Panton, K., & Eskelinen, S. (2020). 21st-century learning design. https://preview.education.microsoft.com
   Google Scholar
• Cavallo, A. M. L., & Laubach, T. A. (2001). students’ science perceptions and enrollment decisions in differing learning cycle classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(9), 1029–1062. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S., Huang, C. C., & Chou, T. L. (2016). The effect of metacognitive scaffolds on low achievers’ laboratory learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(2), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9691-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Education Reform. (2016). 21st-century skills. The Glossary Education Reform. https://www.edglossary.org/21st-century-skills/.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, S. N., Kratochwill, T. R., Littlefield Cook, J., & Travers, J. (2000). Educational psychology: Effective teaching, effective learning (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill College.
   Google Scholar
• Farisi, M. I. (2016). Developing the 21st-century social studies skills through technology integration. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 16–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education. MacGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Friesen, S. (2009). Inquiry-based learning: Three Alberta schools that know what it takes. Education Canada, 49(5), 8–14.
   Google Scholar
• Geoff, M. A. O. (2018). The role of evidence in teaching and learning. Research Conference 2018, Hosted by the Australian Council for Educational Research, 15(1), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Heindl, M. (2018). Inquiry-based learning and its possibilities for primary schools with fewer digital resources – A qualitative study. Pedagogical Research, 3(3), 2468–4929. https://doi.org/10.20897/pr/3932
   Google Scholar
• Herbrecht, E., Poustka, F., Birnkammer, S., Duketis, E., Schlitt, S., & Schmötzer, G. (2009). Pilot evaluation of the Frankfurt social skills training for children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 18(6), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-008-0734-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herodotou, C., Sharples, M., Gaved, M., Kukulska-Hulme, A., Rienties, B., Scanlon, E., & Whitelock, D. (2019). Innovative pedagogies of the future: An evidence-based selection. Frontiers in Education, 4, 113. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00113
   Google Scholar
• Hite, P., & Hasseldine, J. (2001). A primer on tax education in the United States of America. Accounting Education, 10(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639280110034734
   Google Scholar
• Howard, L. W., Tang, T. L., & Austin, M. J. (2014). Teaching critical thinking skills: Ability, motivation, intervention, and the pygmalion effect. Journal of Business Ethics, 5(3), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2084-0
   Google Scholar
• Kairisto-Mertanen, L., & Penttila, T. (2019). Planting the seed for business innovation. FinnWayLearning. Trunn Ammattikorkeakoulu. Turku University of Applied Sciences. http://julkaisut.turkuamk.fi/isbn9789522161697.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Khalaf, B. K. (2018). Traditional and inquiry-based learning pedagogy: A systematic critical review. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 545–564. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11434a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivunja, C. (2014). Innovative pedagogies in higher education to become effective teachers of 21st century skills: Unpacking the learning and innovations skills domain of the new learning paradigm. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(4), 387–398. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n4p37
   Google Scholar
• Lee, L., & Hung, J. C. (2015). Effects of blended e-Learning: A case study in higher education tax learning setting. Computing and Information Sciences, 5(13). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13673-015-0024-3
   Google Scholar
• Liliana, C., & Lavinia, H. (2011). Gender differences in metacognitive skills. A study of the 8th grade pupils in Romania. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 396–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.255
   Google Scholar
• Neziri, M. (2019). Analysis of curricular content that urges the development of critical thinking of pupils in Kosovo schools. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 9(2), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.2478/jesr-2019-0012
   Google Scholar
• Odia, J. O., & Ogiedu, K. O. (2013). Factors affecting the study of accounting in Nigerian universities. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 3(3), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2013.v4n3p89
   Google Scholar
• P21 Partnership. (2015). Demystifying learning frameworks: The P21 framework. Battelle for Kids. www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework.
   Google Scholar
• Papini, M. R. (2014). Evidence-based learning: Evolution of learning. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 27, 420–445.
   Google Scholar
• Shear, L., Gallagher, L., & Patel, D. (2011). Innovative teaching and learning research: 2011 findings and implications. SRI International. https://www.sri.com
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, S. A., & Miller, K. L. (2017). Disruptive trends in higher education: Leadership skills for successful leaders. Journal of Professional Nursing, 33(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2017.11.008
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543045001089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulbrick, R., & Smith, K. (2014). 21st-century learning design: A model of professional learning. Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 41–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.7459/lt/7.1.04
   Google Scholar
• Watson, G., & Glaser, E. M. (1980). Watson–Glaser critical thinking appraisal manual. The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Willingham, D. T. (2019). How to teach critical thinking. Education future frontiers. NSW Department of Education.
   Google Scholar