References
- Arvaja, M., Häkkinen, P., & Kankaanranta, M. (2008). Collaborative learning and computer-supported collaborative learning environments. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 267–279). Springer Science and Business Media, LLC.
- Baker, M. J. (1999). Argumentation and constructive interaction. In G. Rijlaarsdam, E. Espéret (Series Eds.), & P. Coirier, & J. Andriessen (Eds.), Studies in Writing: Vol. 5. Foundations of argumentative text Processing (pp. 179–202). University of Amsterdam Press.
- Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “reading the mind in the eyes” test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 42(2), 241–251. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00715
- Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Science, 12(3), 307–359. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1
- Bell, D. (1995). Racial realism. In K. Crenshaw, N. Gotanda, G. Peller, & K. Thomas (Eds.), Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement (pp. 302–312). New Press.
- Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., Hale, J. L., & Turck, M. A. (1984). Relational messages associated with nonverbal behaviors. Human Communication Research, 10(3), 351–378. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1984.tb00034.x
- Chiu, M. M. (2008). Effects of argumentation on group micro-creativity: Statistical discourse analyses of algebra students’ collaborative problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(3), 382–402. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.05.001
- Cohen, E. G. (1982). Expectation states and interracial interaction in school settings. Annual Review of Sociology, 8(1), 109–235. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.08.080182.001233
- Cohen, E. G. (1994). Status treatments for the classroom [video]. Teachers College Press.
- Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (1995). Producing equal-status interaction in the heterogeneous classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 32(1), 99–120. https://doi-org.ezproxy.library.unlv.edu/https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032001099
- Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (2014). Designing group work: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
- Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 0021–8308. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x
- Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. Elsevier Science.
- Dillenbourg, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2009). The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning: From design to orchestration. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. de Jong, A. Laxonder, & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning (pp. 3–19). Springer.
- Engel, D., Woolley, A. W., Jing, L., Chabris, C. F., & Malone, T. W. (2014). Reading the mind in the eyes or reading between the lines? Theory of mind predicts collective intelligence equally well online and face-to-face. PLoS ONE, 9(12), e115212. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115212
- Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399–483. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_1
- Esmonde, I., & Booker, A. N. (2017). Power and privilege in the learning sciences: Critical and sociocultural theories of learning. Routledge.
- Hall, J. A., Coats, E. J., & LeBeau, L. S. (2005). Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 898–924. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.898
- Henley, N. M. (1977). Body politics: Power, sex, and nonverbal communication. Prentice-Hall.
- Isenberg, D. J. (1986). Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(6), 1141–1151. https://doi-org.ezproxy.library.unlv.edu/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1141
- Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2
- Kapur, M., & Kinzer, C. K. (2007). Examining the effect of problem type in a synchronous computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(5), 439–459. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9045-6
- Law, N., Ludvigsen, S., Cress, U., & Rosé, C. P. (2017). Fostering targeted group practices as a Core focus for CSCL task and technology design. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9253-y
- Leander, K. M. (2002). Locating Latanya: The situated production of identity artifacts in classroom interaction. Research in the Teaching of English, 37(2), 198–250. http://www.ncte.org.ezproxy.library.unlv.edu/library/NCTEFiles/Resources/Journals/RTE/0372-nov02/RT0372Locating.pdf
- Linenhan, C., & McCarthy, J. (2000). Positioning in practice: Understanding participation in the social world. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 30(4), 435–453. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5914.00139
- Lyons, R., Dsouza, N., & Quigley, C. (2016). Viewing equitable practices through the lens of intersecting identities. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(4), 941–951. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9699-z
- Major, B., & Heslin, R. (1982). Perceptions of cross-sex and same-sex nonreciprocal touch: It is better to give than to receive. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 6(3), 148–162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987064
- Martin, D. B. (2006). Mathematics learning and participation as racialized forms of experience: African American parents speak on the struggle for mathematics literacy. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(3), 197–229. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0803_2
- Mehrabian, A. (1969). Significance of posture and position in the communication of attitude and status relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 71(5), 359–372. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027349
- Nathan, M., & Sawyer, R. K. (2014). Foundations of the learning sciences. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 21–38). Cambridge University Press.
- Nussbaum, E. M. (2002). How introverts versus extroverts approach classroom argumentative discussions. The Elementary School Journal, 102(3), 183–197. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/499699
- Nussbaum, E. M., & Bendixen, L. D. (2003). Approaching and avoiding arguments: The role of epistemological beliefs, need for cognition, and extraverted personality traits. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(4), 573–595. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00062-0
- Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs (Ed.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 43–72). Academic Press.
- Olderbak, S., Wilhelm, O., Olaru, G., Geiger, M., Brenneman, M. W., & Roberts, R. D. (2015). A psychometric analysis of the reading the mind in the eyes test: Toward a brief form for research and applied settings. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(1503), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01503
- Parsons, E. C. (2017). Interfaces between critical race theory. In I. Esmonde & A. N. Booker (Eds.), Power and privilege in the learning sciences: Critical and sociocultural theories of learning (pp. 28–49). Routledge.
- Paulus, T., Stewart, H., Reece, A., & Long, P. (2009, June 8–13). Positioning theory as analytical tool for understanding intersubjective meaning-making [poster presentation]. International Society of the Learning Sciences CSCL Conference, Rhodes, Greece. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22318/cscl2009.2.51
- Reiser, G., & Altman, I. (1976). Relationship of nonverbal behavior to the social penetration process. Human Communication Research, 2(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1976.tb00707.x
- Ritchie, S. M. (2002). Student positioning within groups during science activities. Research in Science Education, 32(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015046621428
- Simpson, A., Bannister, N., & Matthews, G. (2017). Cracking her codes: Understanding shared technology resources as positioning artifacts for power and status in CSCL environments. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(3), 221–249. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9261-y
- Sinha, S., Rogat, T. K., Adams-Wiggins, K. R., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2015). Collaborative group engagement in a computer-supported inquiry learning environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(3), 273–307. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-015-9218-y
- Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. MIT Press.
- Tetlock, P. E. (1992). The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 331–376). Academic Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60287-7
- Turner, M. E., & Pratkanis, A. R. (1998). Twenty-five years of Groupthink theory and research: Lessons from the evaluation of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73(2/3), 105–115. https://doi-org.ezproxy.library.unlv.edu/https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2756
- U.S. Department of Education Office of Civil Rights. (2018) . 2015–2016 Civil rights data collection data snapshot. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Civil Rights.
- Webb, N. M., Ing, M., Kersting, N., & Nemer, K. M. (2006). Help seeking in cooperative learning groups. In S. A. Karabenick (Ed.), Strategic help seeking: Implications for learning and teaching (pp. 45–115). Erlbaum.
- White, T. (2006). Code talk: Student discourse and participation with networked handhelds. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(3), 359–382. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-006-9658-5
- Woolley, A. W., Chabris, C. F., Pentland, A., Hashmi, N., & Malone, T. W. (2010). Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science, 330(6004), 686–688. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1193147