References
- Ahlberg, A. (2021). Integration of Doctoral supervisor courses in the research culture: A socio-cultural approach. In A. Lee & R. Bodngaardt (Eds.), The future of doctoral research challenges and opportunities (pp. 239–248). Routledge.
- Berry, S. (2019). Teaching to connect: Community-building strategies for the virtual classroom. Online Learning, 23(1), 164–183. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i1.1425
- Braun, V., Clarke, V., Boulton, E., Davey, L., & McEvoy, C. (2020). The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1805550
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Crossouard, B. (2008). Developing alternative models of doctoral supervision with online formative assessment. Studies in Continuing Education, 30(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01580370701841549
- Dyke, M. (2006). The role of the ‘Other’ in reflection, knowledge formation and action in a late modernity. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 25(2), 105–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370500510728
- Epigeum “Supervising Doctoral Studies”. (2020). https://www.epigeum.com/courses/research/
- Grant, B. M. (2018). Assembling ourselves differently? Contesting the dominant imaginary of doctoral supervision. Parallax, 24(3), 356–370. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2018.1496584
- Gray, M., & Crosta, L. (2019). New perspectives in online doctoral supervision: A systematic literature review. Studies in Continuing Education, 41(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2018.1532405
- Halse, C., & Malfroy, J. (2010). Retheorizing doctoral supervision as professional work. Studies in Higher Education, 35(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902906798
- Hill, G., & Vaughan, S. (2018). Conversations about research supervision – Enabling and accrediting a Community of Practice model for research degree supervisor development. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(2), 153–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1406388
- Huet, I., & Casanova, D. (2021). Exploring the professional development of online and distance doctoral supervisors. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(4), 430–440 . https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1742764
- Jara, M. (2021). Research-based doctoral supervision development programme: Learning through peer learning, reflection and case studies. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(4), 441–450. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1786433
- Kilpatrick, C. D. (2019). Faces or fingers: Building community with synchronous chat. In J. Yoon & P. Semingson (Eds.), Educational technology and resources for synchronous learning in higher education (pp. 1–22). IGI Global.
- Kumar, S., Kumar, V., & Taylor, S. (2020). A guide to online supervision. UK Council for Graduate Education. https://supervision.ukcge.ac.uk/cms/wp-content/uploads/A-Guide-to-Online-Supervision-Kumar-Kumar-Taylor-UK-Council-for-Graduate-Education.pdf
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. University of Cambridge Press.
- Lee, A. (2018). How can we develop supervisors for the modern doctorate? Studies in Higher Education, 43(5), 878–890. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1438116
- Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020). A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 159, 104009. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009
- Nasiri, F., & Mafakheri, F. (2015). Postgraduate research supervision at a distance: A review of challenges and strategies. Studies in Higher Education, 40(10), 1962–1969. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.914906
- Oyarzun, B., Stefaniak, J., Bol, L., & Morrison, G. R. (2018). Effects of learner-to-learner interactions on social presence, achievement and satisfaction. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(1), 154–175. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9157-x
- Pemberton, J., Mavin, S., & Stalker, B. (2007). Scratching beneath the surface of communities of (mal) practice. The Learning Organization.
- Pilkington, R. (2013). Professional dialogues: Exploring an alternative means of assessing the professional learning of experienced HE academics. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(3), 251–263. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2012.717225
- Robson, C. (2002). Real world research (second edition): A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. Blackwell.
- Taylor, S., & Clegg, K. (2021). Towards a framework for the recognition of good supervisory practice. In A. Lee & R. Bodngaardt (Eds.), The future of doctoral research: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 224–238). Routledge.
- United Kingdom Council for Graduate Education. (2019). Research supervision recognition programme. https://supervision.ukcge.ac.uk
- Van den Berg, M. E. S. (2013). An enactivist approach to teaching and learning critical reasoning in ODL. Progressio, 35(1), 190–205. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC144298
- Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Harvard Business School Press.
- Wisker, G. (2007). Supervising postgraduates: Internationally, and at a distance. In P. Wilcox, H. Jones, M. Sumner, & E. Berrington (Eds.), Connections: Sharing the learning space (pp. 23–28). Falmer Press.