Investigating the effects of a programming course using flipped learning

References

• An, Y. (2018). The effects of an online professional development course on teachers’ perceptions, attitudes, self-efficacy, and behavioral intentions regarding digital game-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(6), 1505–1527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9620-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awidi, I. T., & Paynter, M. (2019). The impact of a flipped classroom approach on student learning experience. Computers & Education, 128(1), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.013
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Basawapatna, A. R., Repenning, A., Koh, K. H., & Nickerson, H. (2013 August 12-14). The zones of proximal flow: Guiding students through a space of computational thinking skills and challenges [paper]. proceedings of the ninth annual international acm conference on international computing education research, California US. ACM pp. 67–74
   Google Scholar
• Çalışkan, S., Selçuk, G. S., & Erol, M. (2010). Instruction of problem solving strategies: Effects on physics achievement and self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 9(1), 20–34. http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/?q=node/184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C. C., Warden, C. A., Liang, C., & Lin, G. Y. (2018). Effects of digital game-based learning on achievement, flow and overall cognitive load. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Beyond boredom and anxiety. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2012). The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: A review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 320–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kanaparan, G., Cullen, R., & Mason, D. (2019). Effect of self-efficacy and emotional engagement on introductory programming students. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 23, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v23i0.1825
   Google Scholar
• Kinnunen, P., & Simon, B. (2012). My program is ok–am I? Computing freshmen’s experiences of doing programming assignments. Computer Science Education, 22(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2012.655091
   Google Scholar
• Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading &Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308223
   Google Scholar
• Liu, T.-Y. (2016). Using educational games and simulation software in a computer science course: Learning achievements and student flow experiences. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(4), 724–744. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.917109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis, H., & McCabe, P. P. (2004). Self-efficacy: A key to improving the motivation of struggling learners. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 77(6), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.3200/TCHS.77.6.241-249
   Google Scholar
• McCord, R., & Jeldes, I. (2019). Engaging non-majors in MATLAB programming through a flipped classroom approach. Computer Science Education, 29(4), 313–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2019.1599645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesurado, B., Richaud, M. C., & Mateo, N. J. (2016). Engagement, flow, self-efficacy, and eustress of university students: A cross-national comparison between the philippines and Argentina. The Journal of Psychology, 150(3), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2015.1024595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mok, H. N. (2014). Teaching tip: The flipped classroom. Journal of Information Systems Education, 25(1), 7–11. http://jise.org/Volume25/n1/JISEv25n1p7.html
   Google Scholar
• Murillo-Zamorano, L. R., López-Sánchez, J. Á., & Godoy-Caballero, A. L. (2019). How the flipped classroom affects knowledge, skills, and engagement in higher education: Effects on students’ satisfaction. Computers & Education, 141, 103608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolic, S., Ros, M., & Hastie, D. B. (2018). Teaching programming in common first year engineering: Discipline insights applying a flipped learning problem-solving approach. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 23(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2018.1507243
   Google Scholar
• O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, J. M., Ainley, M., & Howard, S. (2005). The ebb and flow of online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(5), 745–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(04)00036-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellas, N. (2014). The influence of computer self-efficacy, metacognitive self-regulation and self-esteem on student engagement in online learning programs: Evidence from the virtual world of second life. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilke, E. M. (2004). Flow experiences in information technology use. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61(3), 347–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00015-4
   Google Scholar
• Rupnik, D., & Avsec, S. (2020). Effects of a transdisciplinary educational approach on students’ technological literacy. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schukajlow, S., & Rakoczy, K. (2016). The power of emotions: Can enjoyment and boredom explain the impact of individual preconditions and teaching methods on interest and performance in mathematics? Learning and Instruction, 44(1), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 207–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. (1996 April 8-12). Self-efficacy for learning and performance. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association (New York, NY, April 8-12, 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Souza, M. J. D., & Rodrigues, P. (2015). Investigating the effectiveness of the flipped classroom in an introductory programming course. The New Educational Review, 40(2), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2015.40.2.11
   Google Scholar
• Su, C.-Y., & Chen, C.-H. (2018). Investigating the effects of flipped learning, student question generation, and instant response technologies on students’ learning motivation, attitudes, and engagement: A structural equation modeling. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6), 2453–2466. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/89938
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, M.-J., Wang, C.-Y., & Hsu, P.-F. (2019). Developing the computer programming self-efficacy scale for computer literacy education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(8), 1345–1360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117746747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsaparlis, G. (2020). Higher and lower-order thinking skills: The case of chemistry revisited. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(3), 467–483. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallance, M., & Towndrow, P. A. (2018). Mapping computational thinking for a transformative pedagogy. In M. Khine (Ed.), Computational thinking in the STEM disciplines (pp. 301–325). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Villavicencio, F. T., & Bernardo, A. B. I. (2016). Beyond math anxiety: Positive emotions predict mathematics achievement, self-regulation, and self-efficacy. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(3), 415–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015-0251-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, C. O., Greene, B. A., & Mansell, R. A. (2006). Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2005.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L. C., & Chen, M. P. (2010). The effects of game strategy and preference‐matching on flow experience and programming performance in game‐based learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290903525838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, F. H. (2017). An exploration of online behaviour engagement and achievement in flipped classroom supported by learning management system. Computers & Education, 114(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.012
   Google Scholar