Supervisory feedback: Supervisors’ reasons for not giving timely feedback

References

• Abiddin, Z., Hassan, A., & Ahmad, R. (2009). Research student supervision: An approach to good supervisory practice. The Open Education Journal, 2(2), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874920800902010011
   Google Scholar
• Ali, N., Rose, S., & Ahmed, L. (2015). Psychology students’ perception of and engagement with feedback as a function of year of study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(4), 574–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.936355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, P., Watson, P., & Dhingra, K. (2016). Postgraduate research students and their supervisors’ attitudes towards supervision. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11(11), 227–241. https://doi.org/10.28945/3541
   Google Scholar
• Amundsen, C., & McAlpine, L. (2011). New academics as supervisors: A steep learning curve with challenges, tensions, and pleasures. In L. McAlpine & C. Amundsen (Eds.), Doctoral education: Research-based strategies for doctoral students, supervisors and administrators. Springer, 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0507-4_3
   Google Scholar
• Bahtilla, M., & Oben, A. I. (2021). International student’s perception of research supervision in the Social Sciences: The case of three comprehensive universities in China. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46(3), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1945554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastola, M. N. (2020). Engagement and challenges in supervisory feedback: Supervisors’ and students’ perceptions. RELC Journal, 53(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220912547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastola, M. N., & Hu, G. (2020). Supervisory feedback across disciplines: Does it meet students’ expectations? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(3), 407–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1780562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basturkmen, H., East, M., & Bitchener, J. (2014). Supervisors’ on-script feedback comments on drafts of dissertations: Socializing students into the academic discourse community. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(4), 432–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.752728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bégin, C., & Gérard, L. (2013). The role of supervisors in light of the experience of doctoral students. Policy Futures in Education, 11(3), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2013.11.3.267
   Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J., & Basturkmen, H. (2006). Perceptions of the difficulties of postgraduate L2 thesis students writing the discussion section. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(1), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J., Basturkmen, H., & East, M. (2010). The focus of the supervisor is written feedback to thesis/dissertation students. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2010/2/119201
   Google Scholar
• Carter, S., & Kumar, V. (2017). Ignoring me is part of learning: Supervisory feedback on doctoral writing. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(1), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1123104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating qualitative and quantitative research. Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• East, M., Bitchener, L., & Basturkmen, H. (2012). What constitutes effective feedback to postgraduates’ research students? The Students’ Perspectives. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 9(2), 15–32. http://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol9/iss2/7.
   Google Scholar
• Gorup, M., & Laufer, M. (2020). More than a case of a few bad apples: When relationships between supervisors and doctoral researchers go wrong. Elephant in the Lab. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4213175
   Google Scholar
• Gulfidan, C. (2009). A model for doctoral students’ perceptions and attitudes towards written feedback. Studies in Higher Education, 21(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.26076/59df-25b9.
   Google Scholar
• Halse, C. (2011). Becoming a supervisor: The impact of doctoral supervision on supervisor’s learning. Studies in Higher Education, 36(5), 256–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.594593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handley, K., Price, M., & Millar, J. (2011). Beyond ‘doing time’: Investigating the concept of student engagement with feedback. Oxford Review of Education, 37(4), 543–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2011.604951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 8–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, D., Power, T., & Usher, K. (2021). Feedback as a balancing act: Qualitative insights from an experienced multi-cultural sample of doctoral supervisors in nursing. Nurse Education in Practice, 54(20), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103125
   Google Scholar
• Krauss, S., & Ismi, A. (2010). Ph.D. Student’s experience of thesis supervision. Managing relationship in the midst of institutional change. The Qualitative Report, 15(4), 802–822. http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR15-4/krauss.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, V., & Stracke, E. (2007). An analysis of written feedback on a Ph.D. thesis. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(4), 461–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510701415433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S., & Seale, C. (2007). Managing criticism in Ph.D. supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 32(4), 511–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701476225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MINESUP. (2015). University standards applicable to higher education institutions in. Cameroon Ministry of Higher Education. http://www.minesup.gov.cm.
   Google Scholar
• MINESUP. (2017). Guidelines for university research in Cameroon. Ministry of Higher Education. http://www.minesup.gov.cm
   Google Scholar
• Odena, O., & Burgess, H. (2017). How doctoral students and graduates describe facilitating experiences and strategies for their thesis writing learning process: A qualitative approach. Studies in Higher Education, 42(3), 572–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1063598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, E. B. (2007). Negotiating academic: Postgraduate research supervision as category boundary work. Studies in Higher Education, 32(4), 475–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701476167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, M., Handley, K., & Millar, J. (2011). Feedback: Focusing attention on engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 36(8), 879–896. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.483513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruegg, R. (2015). Differences in the uptake of peer and teacher feedback. RELC Journal, 46(2), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214562799
   Google Scholar
• Severinsson, E. (2012). Research supervision: Supervisory style, research-related tasks, importance, and quality. Journal of Nursing Management, 20(2), 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01361.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research; Studying how things work. Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Stracke, E., & Kumar, V. (2014). Feedback and self-regulated learning: Insights from supervisors’ and PhD examiners’reports. Reflective Practice, 11(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940903525140
   Google Scholar
• Vehviläinen, S. (2009). Problems in the research problem: Critical feedback and resistance in academic supervision. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53(2), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830902757592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadesango, N., & Machingambi, S. (2011). Postgraduate students’ experiences with research supervisors. Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 2(1), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/09766634.2011.11885545
   Google Scholar
• Wang, T., & Li, L. Y. (2011). Tell me what to do’ vs. guide me through it: Feedback experiences of international doctoral students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787411402438
   Google Scholar
• Wangenge, O. G., Lutomiah, A., & Langa, P. (2015). Academic incentives for knowledge production. In N. Cloete, P. Maassen, & T. Bailey (Eds.), Knowledge production and contradictory functions in African higher education (pp. 18–31). African Minds.
   Google Scholar
• Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2016). Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist, 52(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, L. (2010). Learning through writing: Reconceptualising the research supervision process. Intentional Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 22(1), 229–237. http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, M., & Carless, D. (2013). The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic feedback processes. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(3), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.719154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zainal, A. (2007). Challenges in Ph.D. studies: The case of art students. European Journal of Social Science, 5(2), 83–93. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.979713.
   Google Scholar