Towards a framework for embedding doctorateness in research proposals

References

• Anderson, V., & Gold, J. (2019). The value of the research doctorate: A conceptual examination. International Journal of Management Education, 17(3), 100305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2019.100305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attia, M., & Edge, J. (2017). Be(com)ing a reflexive researcher: A developmental approach to research methodology. Open Review of Educational Research, 4(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2017.1300068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. T. L. (2017). Doctoral education in quantitative research methods: Some thoughts about preparing future scholars. Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 3, 25. https://doi.org/10.3389/fams.2017.00025
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A., & Bimrose, J. (2014). Model of learning for career and labour market transitions. Research in Comparative and International Education, 9(3), 270–286. https://doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2014.9.3.270
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee-Padmanabhan, M., & Nielsen, W. (2018). Preparing to cross the research proposal threshold: A case study of two international doctoral students. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(4), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1251331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council on Higher Education. (2018). Higher education qualifications sub-framework: Qualification standard for doctoral degrees. http://www.postgrad.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Doctoral-Degrees-Qualification-Standard_Version-1.0_-HEQC-Approved-8-November-2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• de Kleijn, R. A. M., Meijer, P. C., Brekelmans, M., & Pilot, A. (2015). Adaptive research supervision: Exploring expert thesis supervisors’ practical knowledge. Higher Education Research and Development, 34(1), 117–130 doi:10.1080/07294360.2014.934331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denicolo, P. M., & Park, C. (2013). Doctorateness – An elusive concept? In M. Kompf & P. M. Denicolo (Eds.), Critical issues in higher education (Vol. 8, pp. 191–197). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-046-0_15
   Google Scholar
• Duke, D. C., & Denicolo, P. M. (2017). What supervisors and universities can do to enhance doctoral student experience (and how they can help themselves). FEMS Microbiology Letters, 364(9), fnx090. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnx090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, D. L., Bengtsen, S. S. E., Guccione, K., & Kobayashi, S. (2020). Navigating the hidden curriculum: A person-centred approach to developing doctoral researchers BT - The hidden curriculum in doctoral education. In D. L. Elliot, S. S. E. Bengtsen, K. Guccione, & S. Kobayashi (Eds.), The hidden curriculum in doctoral education (pp. 45–60). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41497-9_4
   Google Scholar
• Feldon, D. F., Litson, K., Jeong, S., Blaney, J. M., Kang, J., Miller, C., Griffin, K., & Roksa, J. (2019). Postdocs’ lab engagement predicts trajectories of PhD students’ skill development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(42), 20910–20916. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912488116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldon, D. F., Peugh, J., Timmerman, B. E., Maher, M. A., Hurst, M., Strickland, D., Gilmore, J. A., & Stiegelmeyer, C. (2011). Graduate students’ teaching experiences improve their methodological research skills. Science, 333(6045), 1037–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldon, D. F., Rates, C., & Sun, C. (2017). Doctoral conceptual thresholds in cellular and molecular biology. International Journal of Science Education, 39(18), 2574–2593. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1395493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, S. K. (2009). Conceptualizing success in doctoral education: Perspectives of faculty in seven disciplines. The Review of Higher Education, 32(3), 383–406. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.0.0075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunnarsson, R., Jonasson, G., & Billhult, A. (2013). The experience of disagreement between students and supervisors in PhD education: A qualitative study. BMC Medical Education, 13(1), 134. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inouye, K. S., & McAlpine, L. (2017). Developing scholarly identity: Variation in agentive responses to supervisor feedback. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 14(2), 3. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.14.2.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, S., van Vuuren, M., & de Jong, M. D. T. (2020). Sensemaking in supervisor-doctoral student relationships: Revealing schemas on the fulfillment of basic psychological needs. Studies in Higher Education, 46(12), 2738–2750 doi:10.1080/03075079.2020.1804850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jowi, J. O. (2021). Doctoral training in African universities: Recent trends, developments and issues. Journal of the British Academy, 9(1), 159–181. https://doi.org/10.5871/jba/009s1.159
   Google Scholar
• Keefer, J. M. (2015). Experiencing doctoral liminality as a conceptual threshold and how supervisors can use it. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.981839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd Edidtion). Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802049202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. (2018). How can we develop supervisors for the modern doctorate? Studies in Higher Education, 43(5), 878–890. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1438116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitch, A., Burton, S., Ntshoe, I., Kaniki, A., & Ralebipi-Simela, R. (2022). National review of South African doctoral qualifications 2020-2021: Doctoral degrees national report. Council on Higher Education. https://www.che.ac.za/sites/default/files/inline-files/CHE%20Doctoral%20Degrees%20National%20Reporte.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McKenna, L., Copnell, B., & Smith, G. (2021). Getting the methods right: Challenges and appropriateness of mixed methods research in health‐related doctoral studies. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 30(3–4), 581–587 doi:10.1111/jocn.15534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McVicar, A., Caan, W., Hillier, D., Munn-Giddings, C., Ramon, S., & Winter, R. (2006). A shared experience: An interdisciplinary professional doctorate in health and social care. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43(3), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290600618480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. H. F., Land, R., & Baillie, C. (2010). Editor Preface. In J. H. F. Meyer, R. Land, & C. Baillie (Eds.), Threshold concepts and transformational learning (Vol. 42, pp. ix–xlii). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789460912078
   Google Scholar
• Mowbray, S., & Halse, C. (2010). The purpose of the PhD: Theorising the skills acquired by students. Higher Education Research and Development, 29(6), 653–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.487199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newswander, L. K., & Borrego, M. (2009). Using journal clubs to cultivate a community of practice at the graduate level. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34(6), 561–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790903202959
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, M. H. (2012). The potential for Vygotskian sociocultural perspective in researching researcher development. Asian Social Science, 8(15), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n15p1
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2019). Education at a glance 2019: OECD Indicators. https://doi.org/10.1787/f8d7880d-en
   Google Scholar
• Pietersen, C. (2014). Content issues in students’ research proposals. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(20), 1533–1541. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n20p1533
   Google Scholar
• QAA. (2020). Characteristics statement: Doctoral degree (Third Edition, Vol. QAA2522). https://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/quality-code/doctoral-degree-characteristics-statement-2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rodricks, D. J. (2018). Methodology as a pedagogy of vulnerability: Doctoral research with/in/from the Borderlands. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(10), 786–793. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418788106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J., Barnacle, R., & Cuthbert, D. (2014). How the doctorate contributes to the formation of active researchers: What the research tells us. Studies in Higher Education, 39(10), 1972–1986. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.806460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stracke, E., & Kumar, V. (2020). Encouraging dialogue in doctoral supervision: The development of the feedback expectation tool. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 15, 265–284. https://doi.org/10.28945/4568
   Google Scholar
• Sweitzer, V. (2009). Towards a theory of doctoral student professional identity development: A developmental networks approach. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(1), 1–33 doi:10.1080/00221546.2009.11772128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. E. (2012). Changes in doctoral education. International Journal for Researcher Development, 3(2), 118–138. https://doi.org/10.1108/17597511311316973
   Google Scholar
• Trafford, V., & Leshem, S. (2009). Doctorateness as a threshold concept. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(3), 305–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290903069027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, L. (2010). Learning through writing: Reconceptualising the research supervision process. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 22(3), 229–237 https://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/pdf/IJTLHE22(3).pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfsfeld, L., & Haj-Yahia, M. M. (2010). Learning and supervisory styles in the training of social workers. Clinical Supervisor, 29(1), 68–94 doi:10.1080/07325221003742066.
   Google Scholar
• Yazdani, S., & Shokooh, F. (2018). Defining doctorateness: A concept analysis. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 31–48. https://doi.org/10.28945/3939
   Google Scholar
• Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2013). Understanding supervisors’ commentary practices in doctoral research proposal writing: A Hong Kong study. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(4), 473–483 doi:10.1007/s40299-012-0046-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar