The impact of immersive scheduling on student learning and success in an Australian pathways program

References

• Adamson, J., & Sloan, D. (2021). Developing a technology enabled learning framework supporting staff transitioning degree module content to a blended learning approach. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–11. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.1952642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambler, T., Solomonides, I., & Smallridge, A. (2021). Students’ experiences of a first-year block model curriculum in higher education. Curriculum Journal, 32(3), 533–558. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 18(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436990180105
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (2014). Constructive alignment in university teaching. HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 1, 5–22. https://www.herdsa.org.au/herdsa-review-higher-education-vol-1/5-22
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Buck, E., & Tyrrell, K. (2022). Block and blend: A mixed method investigation into the impact of a pilot block teaching and blended learning approach upon student outcomes and experience. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46(8), 1078–1091. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2022.2050686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau, H.-W., Jamei, E., & Li, M. (2022). Block mode delivery for studio design teaching in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–11. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2022.2062031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colclasure, B. C., LaRose, S. E., Warner, A. J., Ruth, T. K., Bunch, J. C., Thoron, A. C., & Roberts, T. G. (2018). Student perceptions of accelerated course delivery format for teacher preparation coursework. Journal of Agricultural Education, 59(3), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2018.03058
   Google Scholar
• Davies, W. M. (2006). Intensive teaching formats: A review. Issues in Educational Research, 16(1), 1–20. https://iier.org.au/iier16/davies.html
   Google Scholar
• Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. (2014). National strategy for access and student success in higher education. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/299689/bis-14-516-national-strategy-for-access-and-student-success.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department of education, skills and employment. (2020). 2019 section 2 all students. https://www.dese.gov.au/higher-education-statistics/resources/2019-section-2-all-students
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, L., & O’Gorman, V. (2020). ‘Block teaching’–exploring lecturers’ perceptions of intensive modes of delivery in the context of undergraduate education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(5), 583–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1564024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goode, E., Nieuwoudt, J. E., & Roche, T. (2022a). Does online engagement matter? The impact of interactive learning modules and synchronous class attendance on student achievement in an immersive delivery model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goode, E., Roche, T., Wilson, E., & McKenzie, J. W. (2022b). Piloting the Southern cross model: Implications of immersive scheduling for student achievement and feedback. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4154092
   Google Scholar
• Goode, E., Syme, S., & Nieuwoudt, J. (2021). “I have a lot of ‘I’m doing it’ moments”: Improving the success of non-traditional students through the Southern cross model. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3973253
   Google Scholar
• Hailikari, T., Virtanen, V., Vesalainen, M., & Postareff, L. (2021). Student perspectives on how different elements of constructive alignment support active learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 23(3), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787421989160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, M., Power, M., & Wilson, M. (2017). A review of intensive mode of delivery and science subjects in Australian universities. Journal of Biological Education, 51(3), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2016.1217912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, C., & Costley, J. (2022). How sequencing content and fading instructional support reduce extraneous processing. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 59(3), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1861966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisciandro, J., Jones, A., & Geerlings, P. (2018). Enabling learners starts with knowing them: Student attitudes, aspiration and anxiety towards science and maths learning in an Australian pre-university enabling program. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 58(1), 14–40. https://ajal.net.au/downloads/enabling-learners-starts-with-knowing-them-student-attitudes-aspiration-and-anxiety-towards-science-and-maths-learning-in-an-australian-pre-university-enabling-program/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loton, D., Stein, C., Parker, P., & Weaven, M. (2022). Introducing block mode to first-year university students: A natural experiment on satisfaction and performance. Studies in Higher Education, 47(6), 1097–1120. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1843150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutes, L., & Davies, R. (2018). Comparison of workload for university core courses taught in regular semester and time-compressed term formats. Education Sciences, 8(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8010034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, J., Delahunty, J., O’Shea, S., & Stone, C. (2016). Seeking the passionate career: First-in-family enabling students and the idea of the Australian university. Higher Education Quarterly, 70(4), 384–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, J., & Devlin, M. (2016). “Low income doesn’t mean stupid and destined for failure”: Challenging the deficit discourse around students from low SES backgrounds in higher education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(4), 347–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2015.1079273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKie, A. (2022, January 6). Is block teaching the future of university pedagogy? Times Higher Education. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/depth/block-teaching-future-university-pedagogy
   Google Scholar
• Mercer-Mapstone, L., Fatnowna, T., Ross, P., Bricknell, L., Mude, W., Wheat, J., Barone, R. P., Martinez, D. E., West, D., Gregory, S. J., Vanderlelie, J., McLaughlin, T., Kennedy, B., Able, A., Levy, P., Banas, K., Gabriel, F., Pardo, A., & Zucker, I. (2022). Recommendations for equitable student support during disruptions to the higher education sector: Lessons from COVID-19. National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education. https://www.ncsehe.edu.au/publications/equitable-student-support-disruptions-higher-education-covid-19/
   Google Scholar
• Michael, J. (2006). Where’s the evidence that active learning works? American Journal of Physiology – Advances in Physiology Education, 30(4), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00053.2006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwoudt, J. E. (2021). Psychological distress among students in enabling education: An exploratory study. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 61(1), 6–25. https://ajal.net.au/downloads/psychological-distress-among-students-in-enabling-education-an-exploratory-study/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd edn) ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pitman, T., Trinidad, S., Devlin, M., Harvey, A., Brett, M., & McKay, J. (2016). Pathways to higher education: The efficacy of enabling and sub-bachelor pathways for disadvantaged students. National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education. https://www.ncsehe.edu.au/publications/pathways-to-higher-education-the-efficacy-of-enabling-and-sub-bachelor-pathways-for-disadvantaged-students/
   Google Scholar
• The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. (n.d.). Access to higher education. https://www.accesstohe.ac.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, A. S., Murphy, B. C., Curl, L. S., & Broussard, K. A. (2015). The effect of immersion scheduling on academic performance and students’ ratings of instructors. Teaching of Psychology, 42(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628314562675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, P. A. (2003). Attributes of high-quality intensive courses. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2003(97), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.86
   Google Scholar
• Stone, C., & O’Shea, S. (2019). Older, online and first: Recommendations for retention and success. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syme, S., Davis, C., & Cook, C. (2021a). Benchmarking Australian enabling programmes: Assuring quality, comparability and transparency. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(4), 572–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1804825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syme, S., Roche, T., Goode, E., & Crandon, E. (2021b). Transforming lives: The power of an Australian enabling education. Higher Education Research & Development, 1–15. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1990222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, R., Webb, O. J., & Cotton, D. R. E. (2021). Introducing immersive scheduling in a UK university: Potential implications for student attainment. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(10), 1371–1384. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1873252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, K. P., Sanders, M., & Gadgil, S. (2019). Equivalent but not the same: Teaching and learning in full semester and condensed Summer courses. College Teaching, 67(2), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2019.1579702
   Google Scholar
• Winchester, M., Klein, R., & Sinnayah, P. (2021). Block teaching and active learning improves academic outcomes for disadvantaged undergraduate groups. Issues in Educational Research, 31(4), 1330–1350. http://www.iier.org.au/iier31/winchester.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., & Yu, S. (2021). Reconceptualising digital pedagogy during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative inquiry into distance teaching in China. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–11. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.2000473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar