Educational interactions, student experience and the remote learning environment during the Covid-19 lockdown

References

• Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v4i2.149
   Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B., Godfrey, M. R., Johnson, M., Leisen Pollack, B., Niendorf, B., & Wresch, W. (2009). Research in online and blended learning in the business disciplines: Key findings and possible future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(2), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3(3), 265–299. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2006). Towards a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), i–vi.
   Google Scholar
• Carifio, J., & Perla, R. (2008). Resolving the 50-year debate around using and misusing Likert scales. Medical Education, 42(12), 1150–1152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03172.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castle, S. R., & McGuire, C. J. (2010). An analysis of student self-assessment of online, blended, and face-to-face learning environments: Implications for sustainable education delivery. International Education Studies, 3(3), 36–40. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v3n3p36
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. C., & Jones, K. T. (2007). Blended learning vs. traditional classroom settings: Assessing effectiveness and student perceptions in an MBA accounting course. Journal of Educators Online, 4(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2007.1.3
   Google Scholar
• Coates, H., Xie, Z., & Xi, H. (2021). Engaging transformed fundamentals to design global hybrid higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 46(1), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1859683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croxton, R. A. (2014). The role of interactivity in student satisfaction and persistence in online learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 314–324.
   Google Scholar
• Danesh, A., Bailey, A., & Whisenand, T. (2015). Technology and instructor-interface interaction in distance education. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 6(2), 39–47.
   Google Scholar
• de Winter, J. F. C., & Dodou, D. (2010). Five-Point Likert Items: T test versus Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 15. Article 11. https://doi.org/10.7275/bj1p-ts64
   Google Scholar
• Elshami, W., Taha, M., Abuzaid, M., Saravanan, C., Al Kawas, S., & Abdalla, M. (2020). Satisfaction with online learning in the new normal: Perspective of students and faculty at medical and health sciences colleges. Medical Education Online, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1920090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, L., & MacKay, B. (2011). A comparison between paper-based and online learning in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 727–735. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01081.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertl, H., & Wright, S. (2008). Reviewing the literature on the student learning experience in higher education. London Review of Education, 6(3), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460802489348
   Google Scholar
• Goedegebuure, L., & Meek, L. (2021). Crisis – What crisis? Studies in Higher Education, 46(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1859680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harpe, S. (2015). How to analyze Likert and other rating scale data. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching & Learning, 7(6), 836–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2015.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, S. (2004). Likert scales: How to (ab) use them. Medical Education, 38(12), 1217–1218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02012.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, Y., & Belland, B. R. (2016). An exploratory study of adult learners’ perceptions of online learning: Minority students in continuing education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 661–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9442-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyke, J., & Frank, M. (2012). Comparison of student learning outcomes in online and traditional classroom environments in a psychology course. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 39(3/4), 245–250.
   Google Scholar
• Moja, T. (2021). National and institutional responses – Reimagined operations – Pandemic disruptions and academic continuity for a global university. Studies in Higher Education, 46(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1859688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. (1989). Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659
   Google Scholar
• Navarro, D., & Foxcroft, D. (2019). Learning statistics with jamovi: a tutorial for psychology students and other beginners (Version 0.70). https://doi.org/10.24384/hgc3-7p15
   Google Scholar
• Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pell, G. (2005). Use and misuse of Likert scales. Medical Education, 39(9), 970. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02237.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, C., & Colman, A. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: Reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica, 104(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00050-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Chen, L., & Anderson, T. (2014). A framework for interaction and cognitive engagement in connectivist learning contexts. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, A., Starkey, L., Egerton, B., & Flueggen, F. (2020). High school students’ experience of online learning during Covid-19: The influence of technology and pedagogy. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1854337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar