Doctoral supervisors’ and supervisees’ perceptions on supervisory support and frequency of supervision – Do they match?

References

• Castelló, M., Pardo, M., Sala-Bubaré, A., & Suñe-Soler, N. (2017). Why do students consider to dropout of doctoral degrees? Institutional and personal factors. Higher Education, 74(6), 1053–1068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0106-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, G. P. (2006). Researching strategy formation process: An abductive methodology. Quality and Quantity, 40(2), 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-8094-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, S. (1976). Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 38(5), 300–313. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-197609000-00003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, S., Underwood, L., & Gottlieb, B. H., Cohen, S., Underwood, L. G., Gottlieb, B. H. (2000). Social support measurement and intervention. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780195126709.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Corcelles-Seuba, M., Suñe-Soler, N., Sala-Bubaré, A., & Castelló, M. (2022). Doctoral student perceptions of supervisory and research community support: Their relationships with doctoral conditions and experiences. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 47(4), 481–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2022.2142102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornér, S., Pyhältö, K., Peltonen, J., & Bengtsen, S. S. E. (2018). Similar or different? Researcher community and supervisory support experiences among Danish and Finnish social sciences and humanities PhD students. Studies in Graduate and Postgraduate Education, 9(2), 274–295. https://doi.org/10.1108/SGPE-D-18-00003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• De Clercq, M., Devos, C., Azzi, A., Frenay, M., Klein, O., & Galand, B. (2019). I need somebody to lean on: The effect of peer, relative, and supervisor support on emotions, perceived progress, and persistence in different stages of doctoral advancement. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 78(3–4), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devos, C., Boudrenghien, G., Van der Linden, N., Frenay, M., Azzi, A., Galand, B., & Klein, O. (2016). Misfits between doctoral students and their supervisors: (How) are they regulated? International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 467–486. https://doi.org/10.28945/3621
   Google Scholar
• Drisko, J., & Maschi, T. (2015). Content analysis. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Egan, R., Stockley, D., Brouwer, B., Tripp, D., & Stechyson, N. (2009). Relationships between area of academic concentration, supervisory style, student needs and best practices. Studies in Higher Education, 34(3), 337–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802597143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2007). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. (2019). The ethical principles of research with human participants and ethical review in the human sciences in Finland. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK. https://tenk.fi/en/ethical-review
   Google Scholar
• González-Ocampo, G., & Castelló, M. (2019). How do doctoral students experience supervision? Studies in Continuing Education, 41(3), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2018.1520208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, T. (2002). A quantitative analysis of PhD students’ views of supervision. Higher Education Research & Development, 21(1), 41–53.
   Google Scholar
• House, J. (1981). Work stress and social support. Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Hradsky, D., Soyoof, A., Zeng, S., Foomani, E. M., Cong-Lem, N., Maestre, J. L., & Pretorius, L. (2022). Pastoral care in doctoral education: A collaborative autoethnography of belonging and academic identity. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 17, 1. https://doi.org/10.28945/4900
   Google Scholar
• Ives, G., & Rowley, G. (2005). Supervisor selection or allocation and continuity of supervision: PhD students’ progress and outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 30(5), 535–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070500249161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jairam, D., & Kahl, D. H., Jr. (2012). Navigating the doctoral experience: The role of social support in successful degree completion. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 311–329. https://doi.org/10.28945/1700
   Google Scholar
• Latona, K., & Browne, M. (2001). Factors Associated with Completion of Research Higher Degrees. Higher Education Series, Report No 37, May. Higher Education Division, Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Canberra. Retrieved from: http://www.dest.gov.au/archive/highered/hes/hes37/hes37.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802049202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levecque, K., Anseel, F., De Beuckelaer, A., Van der Heyden, J., & Gisle, L. (2017). Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students. Research Policy, 46(4), 868–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfström, E., & Pyhältö, K. (2015). “I don’t even have time to be their friend!” Ethical dilemmas in PhD supervision in hard sciences. International Journal of Science Education, 37(16), 2721–2739. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1104424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovitts, B. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mainhard, T., van der Rijst, R., van Tartwijk, J., & Wubbels, T. (2009). A model for the supervisor–doctoral student relationship. Higher Education, 58(3), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9199-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malfroy, J. (2005). Doctoral supervision, workplace research and changing pedagogic practices. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500062961
   Google Scholar
• Martinsuo, M., & Turkulainen, V. (2011). Personal commitment, support and progress in doctoral studies. Studies in Higher Education, 36(19), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903469598
   Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L., & McKinnon, M. (2013). Supervision – the most variable of variables: Student perspectives. Studies in Continuing Education, 35(3), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2012.746227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L., & Norton, J. (2006). Reframing our approach to doctoral programs: An integrative framework for action and research. Higher Education Research & Development, 25(1), 2–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500453012
   Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L., Paulson, J., Gonsalves, A., & Jazvac-Martek, M. (2012). Untold‘ doctoral stories: Can we move beyond cultural narratives of neglect? Higher Education Research & Development, 31(4), 511–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.559199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Moxham, L., Dwyer, T., & Reid-Searl, K. (2013). Articulating expectations for PhD candidature upon commencement: Ensuring supervisor/student ‘best fit’. Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management, 35(4), 345–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2013.812030
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, N., Bain, J. D., & Conrad, L. (2007). Orientations to research higher degree supervision. Higher Education, 53(2), 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-005-5608-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olmos-López, P., & Sunderland, J. (2017). Doctoral supervisors’ and supervisees’ responses to co-supervision. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 41(6), 727–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2016.1177166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyhältö, K., Castello, M., McAlpine, L., & Peltonen, J. (2018). The cross-country doctoral experience survey (C-DES). User’s manual. manual version.
   Google Scholar
• Pyhältö, K., Peltonen, J., Rautio, P., Haverinen, K., Laatikainen, M., & Veikkaila, J. E. (2016). Summary report on doctoral experience in UniOGS graduate school at the University of Oulu. Acta Universitatis Ouluensis.
   Google Scholar
• Pyhältö, K., Tikkanen, L., & Anttila, H. (2022). Summary report on doctoral and supervisory experience at University of Helsinki. (University of Helsinki Administrative Publications; No. 95). University of Helsinki. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/338695
   Google Scholar
• Pyhältö, K., Vekkaila, J., & Keskinen, J. (2012). Exploring the fit between doctoral students’ and supervisors’ perceptions of resources and challenges vis-à-vis the doctoral journey. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 395–414. https://doi.org/10.28945/1745
   Google Scholar
• Pyhältö, K., Vekkaila(o s Tuomainen), J., & Keskinen, J. (2015). Fit matters in the supervisory relationship: Doctoral students’ and supervisors’ perceptions about supervisory activities. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.981836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeber, M., & Horta, H. (2021). No road is long with good company. What factors affect PhD student’s satisfaction with their supervisor? Higher Education Evaluation and Development, 15(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/HEED-10-2020-0044
   Google Scholar
• Shin, J., Kim, S., Kim, E., & Lim, H. (2018). Doctoral students’ satisfaction in a research-focused Korean university: Socio-environmental and motivational factors. Asia Pacific Education Review, 19(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9528-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sverdlik, A., Hall, N. C., McAlpine, L., & Hubbard, K. (2018). The PhD experience: A review of the factors influencing doctoral students’ completion, achievement, and well-being. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13(1), 361–388. https://doi.org/10.28945/4113
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Tienoven, T. P., Glorieux, A., Minnen, J., Te Braak, P., Spruyt, B., & Zúniga-González, C. A. (2022). Graduate students locked down? PhD students’ satisfaction with supervision during the first and second COVID-19 lockdown in Belgium. PloS One, 17(5), e0268923–e0268923. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vekkaila, J., Virtanen, V., Taina, J., & Pyhältö, K. (2016). The function of social support in engaging and disengaging experiences among post PhD researchers in STEM disciplines. Studies in Higher Education, 43(8), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1259307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wao, H. O., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2011). A mixed research investigation of factors related to time to the doctorate in education. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 6, 115–134. https://doi.org/10.28945/1505
   Google Scholar
• Woolderink, M., Putnik, K., van der Boom, H., & Klabbers, G. (2015). The voice of PhD candidates and PhD supervisors. A qualitative exploratory study amongst PhD candidates and supervisors to evaluate the relational aspects of PhD supervision in the Netherlands. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10, 217. https://doi.org/10.28945/2276
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, C.-M., Golde, C. M., & McCormick, A. C. (2007). More than a signature. How advisor choice and advisor behavior affect doctoral student satisfaction. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31(3), 263–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770701424983
   Google Scholar