Effects of learner factors on the scorer reliability of self- and peer-assessment of Chinese college students’ EFL writing

References

• Adachi, C., Tai, J. H., & Dawson, P. (2018). Academics’ perceptions of the benefits and challenges of self and peer assessment in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(2), 294–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1339775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Admiraal, W., Huisman, B., & Pilli, O. (2015). Assessment in massive open online courses. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 13(4), 207–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfallay, I. (2004). The role of some selected psychological and personality traits of the rater in the accuracy of self and peer assessment. System, 32(3), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.04.006
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2007). Student responses to criteria-referenced self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600801928
   Google Scholar
• Baars, M., Vink, S., van Gog, T., de Bruin, A., & Paas, F. (2014). Effects of training self-assessment and using assessment standards on retrospective and prospective monitoring of problem solving. Learning & Instruction, 33, 92–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1989). The construct validation of self-ratings of communicative language ability. Language Testing, 6(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228900600104
   Google Scholar
• Borg, S., & Al-Busaidi, S. (2012). Learner autonomy: English language teachers’ beliefs and practices. ELT Research Paper, 12(7), 1–45.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., Lawson, R., & Thompson, D. G. (2015). The calibration of student judgement through self-assessment: Disruptive effects of assessment patterns. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourke, R. (2014). Self-assessment in professional programmes within tertiary institutions. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(8), 908–918. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.934353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozkurt, F. (2020). Teacher candidates’ views on self and peer assessment as a tool for student development. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2020v45n1.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, Y. G. (2018). Young learners’ processes and rationales for responding to self-assessment items: Cases for generic can-do and five-point Likert-type formats. In J. Davis, Ed. Useful assessment and evaluation in language education (pp. 21–39). Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Y. G., & Lee, J. (2006). On-task versus off-task self-assessment among Korean elementary school students studying English. The Modern Language Journal, 90(4), 506–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00463.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, R., Iqbal, J., Liu, Y., Zhu, M., & Xie, Y. (2022). Impact of self-concept, self-imagination, and self-efficacy on English language learning outcomes among blended learning students during COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(March), 784444. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.784444
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Concina, E. (2022). The relationship between self- and peer assessment in higher education: A systematic review. Trends in Higher Education, 1(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu1010004
   Google Scholar
• Dai, H., & Zhang, F. (2018). Psychological & educational measurement. Jinan University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dowson, M., Barker, K., & McInerney, D. M. (2003, November 29-December 3). The chicken and the egg: Causal ordering of goals and self-concept and its effect on academic achievement [Paper presentation]. Joint AARE/NZARE Conference, Auckland, New Zealand, DOW03773.
   Google Scholar
• Edele, A., Seuring, J., Kristen, C., & Stanat, P. (2015). Why bother with testing? The validity of immigrants’ self-assessed language proficiency. Social Science Research, 52, 99–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.12.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N. (1986). Product comparisons and process benefits of collaborative peer group and self-assessments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 11(2), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293860110206
   Google Scholar
• Fallows, S., & Chandramohan, B. (2001). Multiple approaches to assessment; reflections on use of tutor, peer and self-assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(2), 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510120045212
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. (2011). Peer assessment in large undergraduate classes: An evaluation of a procedure for marking laboratory reports and a review of related practices. Advances in Physiology Education, 35(2), 178–187. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00115.2010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iglesias Pérez, M. C., Vidal-Puga, J., & Pino Juste, M. R. (2020). The role of self and peer assessment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 47(3), 683–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1783526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovach, R. A., Resch, D. S., & Verhulst, S. J. (2009). Peer assessment of professionalism: A five-year experience in medical clerkship. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 24(6), 742–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-0961-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langan, M., Shuker, D., Cullen, R., Penney, D., Preziosi, R., & Wheater, P. (2008). Relationships between student characteristics and self-, peer and tutor evaluations of oral presentations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701292498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, L. (2012). Optional self-assessment: Some tensions and dilemmas. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(2), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.515013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lew, M. D., Alwis, W., & Schmidt, H. G. (2010). Accuracy of students’ self-assessment and their beliefs about its utility. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(2), 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930802687737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., Xiong, Y., Zang, X. L., Kornhaber, M., Lyu, Y., Chung, K. S., & Suen, H. K. (2016). Peer assessment in the digital age: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher ratings. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(2), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.999746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M., & Zhang, X. (2021). A meta-analysis of self-assessment and language performance in language testing and assessment. Language Testing, 38(2), 189–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532220932481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, E. (2009). Self and peer assessment in action. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 3(1), 29–35.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, M. A., Bear, G. G., & Minke, K. M. (2006). Self-concept and self-esteem. In G. G. Bear & K. M. Minke (Eds.), Children’s needs III: Development, prevention, and intervention (pp. 341–356). National Association of School Psychologists.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, M. B., Haug, J. C., & Hu, H. (2018). Investigating undergraduate business internships: Do supervisor and self-evaluations differ? Journal of Education for Business, 93(2), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2017.1414025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1990). Self-description questionnaire II: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of adolescent self-concept: A test manual and research monograph. Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuno, S. (2009). Self-, peer-, and teacher-assessments in Japanese university EFL writing classrooms. Language Testing, 26(1), 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532208097337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, W., & Winke, P. (2019). Self-assessment: How reliable is it in assessing oral proficiency over time? Foreign Language Annals, 52(1), 66–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The National College Foreign Language Teaching Advisory Board. (2020) . College English teaching guidelines (2020 ed.). Higher Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nawas, A. (2020). Grading anxiety with self and peer-assessment: A mixed-method study in an Indonesian EFL context. Issues in Educational Research, 30(1), 224–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndoye, A. (2017). Peer/Self-assessment and student learning. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(2), 255–269.
   Google Scholar
• Nowell, C., & Alston, R. M. (2007). I thought I got an A! Overconfidence across the economics curriculum. The Journal of Economic Education, 38(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.3200/JECE.38.2.131-142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (2002). The use of exemplars and formative feedback when using student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(4), 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293022000001337
   Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., Brown, G. T. L., & Courtney, M. G. R. (2014). Teachers’ reasons for using self-assessment: A survey self-report of Spanish teachers. Assessment in Education Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(3), 365–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.919247
   Google Scholar
• Patri, M. (2002). The influence of peer feedback on self and peer assessment of oral skills. Language Testing, 19(2), 109–131. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532202lt224oa
   Google Scholar
• Richards, J. C., Platt, J., & Platt, H. (2000). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saito, H., & Fujita, T. (2004). Characteristics and user acceptance of peer rating in EFL writing classroom. Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168804lr133oa
   Google Scholar
• Salehi, M., & Masoule, Z. S. (2017). An investigation of the reliability and validity of peer, self-, and teacher assessment. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 35(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2016.1267577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sluijsmans, D., Dochy, F., & Moerkerke, G. (1999). Creating a learning environment by using self, peer, and co-assessment. Learning Environment Research, 1(3), 293–319. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009932704458
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki, Y. (2015). Self-assessment of Japanese as a second language: The role of experiences in the naturalistic acquisition. Language Testing, 32(1), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214541885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• To, J., & Panadero, E. (2019). Peer assessment effects on the self-assessment process of first-year undergraduates. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(6), 920–932. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1548559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. (2003). Self and peer assessment in school and university: Reliability, validity and utility. In M. Segers, F. Dochy, & E. Cascallar (Eds.), Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards (pp. 55–87). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ünaldı, I. (2016). Self and teacher assessment as predictors of proficiency levels of Turkish EFL learners. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.980223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2018). Formative self-and peer assessment for improved student learning: The crucial factors of design, teacher participation and feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), 1032–1047. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1427698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisi, H., & Karimi, M. N. (2013). The effect of self-assessment among Iranian EFL learners. Procedia - Social & Behavioral Sciences, 70, 731–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.117
   Google Scholar
• Willey, K., & Gardner, A. (2010). Investigating the capacity of self and peer assessment activities to engage students and promote learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(4), 429–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2010.490577
   Google Scholar
• Yan, Z., & Brown, G. (2017). A cyclical self-assessment process: Towards a model of how students engage in self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1247–1262. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1260091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar