Avatarian embodiment in Indigenous Futurisms 4D: the intersemiosis of intercultural encounters

References

• Bache, C. (2013). Grammatical choice and communicative motivation: A radical systemic approach. In I. L. Fontaine, T. Bartlett, & G. O. Grady (Eds.), Systemic functional linguistics: Exploring choice (pp. 72–29). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, J. A. (2008). Multimodality and genre: A foundation for the systematic analysis of multimodal documents. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Baudemann, K. (2016). Indigenous futurisms in North American indigenous Art. Extrapolation, 57(1/2), 117. https://doi.org/10.3828/extr.2016.8
   Google Scholar
• Butt, D., Moore, A., & Tuckwell, K. (2013). The teleological illusion in linguistic ‘drift’: Choice and purpose in semantic evolution. In L. Fontaine, T. Bartlett, & G. O'Grady (Eds.), Systemic functional linguistics: Exploring choice (pp. 37–55). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ceuterick, M., & Ingraham, C. (2021). Immersive storytelling and affective ethnography in virtual reality. Review of Communication, 21(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2021.1881610
   Google Scholar
• Cushing, C. (2021, July 23). The future of augmented and virtual reality. Equinix. https://blog.equinix.com/blog/2021/07/23/the-future-of-augmented-and-virtual-reality/
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, G. L. (Ed.). (2012). Walking the clouds: An anthology of indigenous science fiction. University of Arizona Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, G. L. (2016). Introduction: Indigenous futurisms, Bimaashi Biidaas Mose, flying and walking towards you. Extrapolation, 57(1–2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3828/extr.2016.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Failes, I. (2018). Baobab’s ‘Crow: The Legend’: The Most Immersive VR Narrative Experience So Far?. https://www.cartoonbrew.com/vr/baobabs-crow-the-legend-the-most-immersive-vr-narrative-experience-so-far-165836.html
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (2013). Meaning as choice. In L. Fontaine, T. Bartlett, & G. O. Grady (Eds.), Systemic functional linguistics: Exploring choice (pp. 15–36). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed). Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Herb, A. (2019). Non-linear modes of narrative in the disruption of time and genre in Ambelin Kwaymullina’s the Interrogation of Ashala Wolf. Media/Culture Journal, 22, 6. https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.1607
   Google Scholar
• Ihde, D. (1979). Technics and praxis. D. Reidel Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ihde, D. (1993). Postphenomenology. Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ihde, D. (2002). Bodies in technology. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• James, L. (2016). Children of change, not doom: Indigenous futurist heroines in YA. Extrapolation, 57(1-2), 151–176. https://doi.org/10.3828/extr.2016.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, L. (2019). Immersive embodiment: Theatres of mislocalized sensation. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J., & O'Halloran, K. L. (2016). Introducing multimodality. London: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2000).  Text as the punctuation of semiosis: Pulling at some of the threads. In U. H. Meinhof & J. Smith (Eds.), Intertextuality and the media. From genre to everyday life (pp. 132–153). Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: a social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2002). Colour as a semiotic mode: Notes for a grammar of colour. Visual Communication, 1(3), 343–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/147035720200100306
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2020). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (3rd ed). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003099857
   Google Scholar
• Kwaymullina, A., & Kwaymullina, B. (2010). Learning to read the signs: Law in an Indigenous reality. Journal of Australian Studies, 34(2), 195. https://doi.org/10.1080/14443051003721189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaPensée, E. (2017). Video games encourage Indigenous cultural expression. The Conversation, 22 March. http://theconversation.com/video-games-encourage-indigenous-cultural-expression-74138
   Google Scholar
• Lidchi, H., & Fricke, S. N. (2019). Future history: Indigenous Futurisms in North American visual arts. World Art, 9(2), 99–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/21500894.2019.1627675
   Google Scholar
• Lim, F. V. (2021). Investigating intersemiosis: a systemic functional multimodal discourse analysis of the relationship between language and gesture in classroom discourse. Visual Communication, 20(1), 34 -58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357218820695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2009). Meaning in the making: Meaning potential emerging from acts of meaning. Anniversary Issue of Language Learning, 59(Suppl. 1), 211–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00541.x
   Google Scholar
• Mills, K. A., Unsworth, L., & Scholes, L. (2022). Literacy for digital futures: Mind, body, text. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. (2017). The empathy engine: VR documentary and deep connection. Senses of Cinema, June. https://www.sensesofcinema.com/2017/feature-articles/vr-documentary-and-deep-connection/
   Google Scholar
• O’Halloran, K. (2008). Systemic functional-multimodal discourse analysis (SF-MDA): constructing ideational meaning using language and visual imagery. Visual Communication, 7(4), 443–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357208096210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osimo, S., Pizarro, R., Spanlang, B., & Slater, M. (2015). Conversations between self and self as Sigmund Freud – A virtual body ownership paradigm for self counselling. Scientific Reports, 5(1), 13899. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13899
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Royce, T. (2016). 15. Intersemiotic complementarity in print advertisements. In N. Klug & H. Stöckl (Ed.), Handbuch sprache im multimodalen kontext (pp. 348-371). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110296099-016
   Google Scholar
• Verbeek, P. P. (2005). What things do (philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design), 1st Edn. University Park, MD: Penn State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verbeek, P. P. (2010). What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. Penn State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verbeek, P. P. (2015). Designing the public sphere: Information technologies and the politics of mediation. In L. Floridi (Ed.), The onlife manifesto (pp. 217–227). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Vindenes, J., & Wasson, B. (2021). A postphenomenological framework for studying user experience of immersive virtual reality. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2021.656423.
   Google Scholar
• Wallis, K., & Ross, M. (2021). Fourth VR: Indigenous virtual reality practice. Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies, 27(2), 313–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856520943083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, S. (2010). Intersemiotic relations as logogenetic patterns: Towards restoration of the time dimension in hypertext description. In M. Bednarek & J. R. Martin (Eds.), New discourse on language: Functional perspectives on multimodality, identity, and affiliation (pp. 195–218). Continuum.
   Google Scholar