Identity work in conservative political discourse: a cross-cultural comparison

References

• Antaki, C., & Widdicombe, S. (Eds.) (1998). Identities in talk. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Benwell, B., & Stokoe, E. (2010). Analysing identity in interaction: Contrasting discourse, genealogical, narrative and conversation analysis. In M. Wetherell & C. Mohanty (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of identities (pp. 82–103). Sage
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M. (1996). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, C., & Manza, J. (2013). A broken public? Americans’ responses to the great recession. American Sociological Review, 78(5), 727–748. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122413498255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, M. (1964). The symbolic uses of politics. Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, G. N., & Mulkay, M. (1984). Opening pandora's box: A sociological analysis of scientists’ discourse. CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (2009). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (2021). The presentation of self in everyday life. Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, N., Medvetz, T., & Russell, R. (2011). The contemporary American conservative movement. Annual Review of Sociology, 37(1), 325–354. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, K., O'Dwyer, E., & Lyons, E. (2019). The individual and the nation: A qualitative analysis of US liberal and conservative identity content. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 7(1), 378–401. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v7i1.1062
   Google Scholar
• Holliday, A., Hyde, M., & Kullman, J. (2021). Intercultural communication: An advanced resource book for students. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hutter, S., Kriesi, H., & Lorenzini, J. (2018). Social movements in interaction with political parties. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, H. Kriesi, & H. J. McCammon (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 322–337). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kidder, J. L. (2016). College republicans and conservative social identity. Sociological Perspectives, 59(1), 177–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121415583104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (1996). Moral politics: What conservatives know that liberals don't. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lavizzari, A., & Prearo, M. (2019). The anti-gender movement in Italy: Catholic participation between electoral and protest politics. European Societies, 21(3), 422–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2018.1536801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Q., & Brewer, M. B. (2004). What does it mean to be an American? Patriotism, nationalism, and American identity after 9/11. Political Psychology, 25(5), 727–739. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00395.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luttig, M. (2013). The structure of inequality and Americans’ attitudes toward redistribution. Public Opinion Quarterly, 77(3), 811–821. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nft025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdams, D. P., Albaugh, M., Farber, E., Daniels, J., Logan, R. L., & Olson, B. (2008). Family metaphors and moral intuitions: How conservatives and liberals narrate their lives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(4), 978. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean, N. (2012). Researching academic identity: Using discursive psychology as an approach. International Journal for Academic Development, 17(2), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2011.599596
   Google Scholar
• Mclean, N., & Price, L. (2016). The mechanics of identity formation: A discursive psychological perspective on academic identity. In J. Smith, J. Rattray, T. Peseta, & D. Loads (Eds.), Identity work in the contemporary university (pp. 45–57). Brill.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, N., & Price, L. (2019a). Identity formation among novice academic teachers—a longitudinal study. Studies in Higher Education, 44(6), 990–1003. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1405254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean, N., & Price, L. (2019b). A longitudinal study of the impact of reflective coursework writing on teacher development courses: A ‘legacy effect’ of iterative writing tasks. Higher Education, 77(5), 949–962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0312-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muwwakkil, J. J. (2019). ‘It's Very Isolating’: Discourse Strategies of Conservative Student Groups on a Liberal University Campus. University of California, Santa Barbara.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J. (1996). Discourse analysis and constructionist approaches: Theoretical background. British Psychological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Samovar, L. A., Porter, R. E., McDaniel, E. R., & Roy, C. S. (2014). Intercultural communication: A reader. Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Scollon, R., Scollon, S. W., & Jones, R. H. (2012). Intercultural communication: A discourse approach. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer-Oatey, H. (Ed.) (2004). Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures. A&C Black.
   Google Scholar
• Te Molder, H. (2015). Discursive psychology. In K. Tracy, C. Ilie, & T. Sandel (Eds.), The international encyclopaedia of language and social interaction (pp. 1–11). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M., & Edley, N. (1999). Negotiating hegemonic masculinity: Imaginary positions and psycho-discursive practices. Feminism & Psychology, 9(3), 335–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353599009003012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar