Nivolumab for the treatment of esophageal cancer

References

• World Health Organization. GLOBOCAN 2018 estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide. [cited 2021 Mar 24]. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr/
   Google Scholar
• Thrift AP. The epidemic of oesophageal carcinoma: where are we now? Cancer Epidemiol. 2016;41:88–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rustgi AK, El-Serag HB, Ingelfinger JR. Esophageal carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(26):2499–2509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Serag HB, Hashmi A, Garcia J, et al. Visceral abdominal obesity measured by CT scan is associated with an increased risk of Barrett’s oesophagus: a case-control study. Gut. 2014;63(2):220–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Njei B, McCarty TR, Birk JW. Trends in esophageal cancer survival in United States adults from 1973 to 2009: a SEER database analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;31(6):1141–1146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H, et al. A randomized trial of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for clinical stage II/III squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG 9907). Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jan;19(1):68–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, Van Lanschot JJ, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(22):2074–2084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Batran SE, Homann N, Pauligk C, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel versus fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin and epirubicin for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4): a randomised, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10184):1948–1957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(1):11–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minsky BD, Pajak TK, Ginsberg RJ, et al. INT 0123 (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 94-05) phase III trial of combined-modality therapy for esophageal cancer: high-dose versus standard-dose radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(5):1167–1174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conroy T, Galais MP, Raoul JL, et al. Definitive chemoradiotherapy with FOLFOX versus fluorouracil and cisplatin in patients with oesophageal cancer (PRODIGE5/ACCORD17): final results of a randomised, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(3):305–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCCN guidelines v. Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers.
   Google Scholar
• Lordick F, Mariette C, Haustermans K, et al. Oesophageal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(suppl 5):v50–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muro K, Lordick F, Tsushima T, et al. Pan-Asian adapted ESMO clinical practice guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic oesophageal cancer: a JSMO–ESMO initiative endorsed by CSCO, KSMO, MOS, SSO and TOS. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(1):34–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adenis A, Bennouna J, Etienne PL, et al. Continuation versus discontinuation of first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic squamous cell oesophageal cancer: a randomised phase II trial (E-DIS). Eur J Cancer. 2019;111:12–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iizuka T, Kakegawa T, Ide H, et al. Phase II evaluation of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a Japanese esophageal oncology group trial. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1992;22(3):172–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi K, Ando N, Watanabe H, et al. Phase II evaluation of protracted infusion of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a Japan esophageal oncology group (JEOG) trial (JCOG9407). Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2001;31(9):419–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kato K, Tahara M, Hironaka S, et al. A phase II study of paclitaxel by weekly 1-h infusion for advanced or recurrent esophageal cancer in patients who had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2011;67(6):1265–1272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muro K, Hamaguchi T, Ohtsu A, et al. A phase II study of single-agent docetaxel in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2004;15(6):955–959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janowitz T, Thuss-Patience P, Marshall A, et al. Chemotherapy vs supportive care alone for relapsed gastric, gastroesophageal junction, and oesophageal adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis of patient-level data. Br J Cancer. 2016;114(4):381–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brahmer JR, Drake CG, Woller I, et al. Phase I study of single-agent anti-programmed death-1 (MDX-1106) in refractory solid tumors: safety, clinical activity, pharmacodynamics, and immunologic correlates. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(19):3167–3175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postow MA, Chesney J, Pavlick AC, et al. Nivolumab and ipilimumab versus ipilimumab in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(21):2006–2017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brahmer J, Reckamp KL, Baas P, et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced squamous-cell non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(2):123–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell SM, Lesokhin AM, Borrello I, et al. PD-1 blockade with nivolumab in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(4):311–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motzer RJ, Escudier B, McDermott DF, et al. Nivolumab versus everolimus in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(19):1803–1813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris RL, Blumenschein G Jr., Fayette J, et al. Nivolumab for recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(19):1856–1867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma P, Retz M, Siefker-Radtke A, et al. Nivolumab in metastatic urothelial carcinoma after platinum therapy (CheckMate 275): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(3):312–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overman MJ, McDermott R, Leach JL, et al. Nivolumab in patients with metastatic DNA mismatch repair-deficient or microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer (CheckMate 142): an open-label, multicentre, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(9):1182–1191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Khoueiry AB, Sangro B, Yau T, et al. Nivolumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (CheckMate 040): an open-label, non-comparative, phase 1/2 dose escalation and expansion trial. Lancet. 2017;389(10088):2492–2502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang YK, Boku N, Satoh T, et al. Nivolumab in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer refractory to, or intolerant of, at least two previous chemotherapy regimens (ONO-4538-12, ATTRACTION-2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;390(10111):2461–2471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okada M, Kijima T, Aoe K, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety of nivolumab: results of a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, Japanese Phase II study in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MERIT). Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(18):5485–5492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION. 35. These highlights do not include all the information needed to use OPDIVO safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for OPDIVO. 2018. [cited 2021 Mar 24]. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2019/125554s070lbl.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wang C, Thudium KB, Han M, et al. In vitro characterization of the anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab, BMS-936558, and in vivo toxicology in non-human primates. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014;2(9):846–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Suryawanshi S, Hruska M, et al. Assessment of nivolumab benefit-risk profile of a 240-mg flat dose relative to a 3-mg/kg dosing regimen in patients with advanced tumors. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(8):2002–2008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kudo T, Hamamoto Y, Kato K, et al. Nivolumab treatment for oesophageal squamous-cell carcinoma: an open-label, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 18(5): 631–639. 2017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kato K, Cho BC, Takahashi M, et al. Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma refractory or intolerant to previous chemotherapy (ATTRACTION-3): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 20(11): 1506–1517. 2019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly RJ, Ajani JA, Kuzdzai J, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab in resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer (EC/GEJC) following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT): first results of the CheckMate 577 study. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(4_suppl):S1193-S1194.
   Google Scholar
• Shah MA, Kojima T, Hochhauser D, et al. Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab for heavily pretreated patients with advanced, metastatic adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: the Phase 2 KEYNOTE-180 study. JAMA Oncol. 5(4): 546–550. 2019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kojima T, Shah MA, Muro K, et al. Randomized Phase III KEYNOTE-181 study of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in advanced esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(35):4138–4148. Online ahead of print.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kato K, Sun JM, Shah MA, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as first-line therapy in patients with advanced esophageal cancer: the phase 3 KEYNOTE-590 study. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(4_suppl):S1192-S1193.
   Google Scholar
• Moehler M, Shitara K, Garrido M, et al. Nivolumab (nivo) plus chemotherapy (chemo) versus chemo as first-line (1L) treatment for advanced gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC)/esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC): first results of the CheckMate 649 study. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(4_suppl):S1191.
   Google Scholar
• Ajani JA, Kato K, Doki Y, et al. CheckMate 648: a randomized phase 3 study of nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab combined with fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin in patients with unresectable advanced, recurrent, or metastatic previously untreated esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonia SJ, Villegas A, Daniel D, et al. Overall Survival with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(24):2342–2350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly RJ, Smith KN, Anagnostou V, et al. Neoadjuvant nivolumab plus concurrent chemoradiation in stage II/III esophageal/gastroesophageal junction cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(4_suppl):142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu JJ, Atkinson EC, Leichman LP, et al. A phase I/II multisite study of nivolumab and carboplatin/paclitaxel with radiation therapy (RT) in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(4_suppl):abstr372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto S, Kato K, Daiko H, et al. Feasibility study of nivolumab as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally esophageal carcinoma: FRONTiER (JCOG1804E). Future Oncol. 2020;16(19):1351–1357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar