Benchmarks and Citizen Judgments of Local Government Performance: Findings from a survey experiment

REFERENCES

• Ammons, D. N. (1997) Raising the Performance BarLocally. Public Management Magazine, 79 pp10–16.
   Google Scholar
• Ammons, D. N. and Edwards, J. S. (2008) Misrepresentation of Staffing Standards for Police. State and Local Government Review, 40 pp186–94.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., Moon, M. J. and Walker, R. M. (2010) Assessing Organizational Performance: Exploring Differences between Internal and External Measures. International Public Management Journal, 13 pp105–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnow, B. S. and Heinrich, C. J. (2010) One Standard Fits All? The Pros and Cons of Performance Standard Adjustments. Public Administration Review, 70 pp60–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, J. K., Bernard, S. L., Sofaer, S., Giannotti, T. E., Lenfestey, N. F. and Miranda, D. J. 2008. Physicians' Views on Public Reporting of Hospital Quality Data. Medical Care Research and Review, 65 pp655–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, S. M., Cox, D., Farewell, V. T., Goldstein, H., Holt, T. and Smith, P. C. (2005) Performance Indicators: Good, Bad, and Ugly. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series A), 168 pp1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, B. J. C. (2006) The Voices of the People: Missing Links in Performance Measurement and Management. Government Finance Review, 22 pp16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, B. J. C. (2008) Involving the Public in Measuring and Reporting Local Government Performance. National Civic Review, 97 pp3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, E. and Wang, X. (2000) Performance Measurement is U.S. Counties: Capacity for Reform. Public Administration Review, 60 pp409–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw, P. J. (2006) Freedom of Information and Openness: Fundamental Human Rights. Administrative Law Review, 58 pp177–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A. (2002) Concepts and Indicators of Local Authority Performance: An Evaluation of the Statutory Frameworks in England and Wales. Public Money & Management, 22 pp17–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A., James, O., John, P. and Petrovsky, N. (2009) Democracy and Government Performance: Holding Incumbents Accountable in English Local Governments. Journal of Politics, 71 pp1273–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charbonneau, É. and Bellavance, F. (2012) Blame Avoidance in Public Reporting: Evidence from a Provincially-Mandated Municipal Performance Measurement Regime. Public Performance & Management Review, 35 pp399–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruijin, H. (2002) Performance Measurement in the Public Sector: Strategies to Cope with the Risks of Performance Measurement. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15 pp578–94.
   Google Scholar
• Fenster, M. (2006) The Opacity of Transparency. Iowa Law Review, 91 pp885–949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foltin, C. (1999) State and Local Government Performance: It's Time to Measure Up! The Government Accountants Journal, 48 pp40–46.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, T., Fischer, M., Malone, D. and Tower, G. (2002) A Comparative Empirical Examination of Extent of Disclosure by Private and Public Colleges and Universities in the United States. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 21 pp235–75.
   Google Scholar
• Government Accounting Standard Board. (2012). Concepts Statements – Elements of SEA Reporting: The Elements of SEA Reporting and Related Information. Available at http://www.seagov.org/concepts_statements/elements.shtml (accessed 3 February 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. L. (2007) Implications of Success and Persistence for Public Sector Performance. Public Organization Review, 7 pp281–97.
   Google Scholar
• Hatry, H. P. (2010) Looking into the Crystal Ball: Performance Management over the Next Decade. Public Administration Review, 70 pps208–11.
   Google Scholar
• Heald, D. (2006) ‘Varieties of Transparency’ in C. Hood and D. Heald (eds) Transparency: The Key to Better Governance? Oxford: The British Academy by Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Her Majesty’s Treasury. (2003) Setting Key Targets for Executive Agencies: A Guide, Norwich: HM Treasury.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (2010) Accountability and Transparency: Siamese Twins, Matching Parts, Awkward Couple? West European Politics, 33 pp989–1009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, W. (2006). Switching Schools? A Closer Look at Parents’ Initial Interest in and Knowledge About the Choice Provisions of No Child Left Behind. Peabody Journal of Education, 81 pp140–79.
   Google Scholar
• James, O. (2011) Performance Measures and Democracy: Information Effects on Citizens in Field and Laboratory Experiments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21 pp399–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, O. and John, P. (2007) Public Management at the Ballot Box: Performance Information and Electoral Support for Incumbent English Local Governments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17 pp567–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, E. P. (2008) New Public Management: Perspectives on Performance and the Use of Performance Information. Financial Accountability & Management, 24 pp169–91.
   Google Scholar
• Laesson, T. (1998) ‘How Open Can a Government Be? The Swedish Experience’ in V. Deckmyn and I. Thomson (eds) Openness and Transparency in the European Union. Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Leckie, G. and Goldstein, H. (2009) The Limitations of Using School League Tables to Inform School Choice. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, 172 pp835–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. (2006) The History of Municipal Public Reporting. International Journal of Public Administration, 29 pp453–76.
   Google Scholar
• Lonti, Z. and Gregory, R. (2007) Accountability or Countability? Performance Measurement in the New Zealand Public Service, 1992–2002. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66 pp468–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margetts, H. Z. (2006) ‘Transparency and Digital Government’ in C. Hood and D. Heald (eds) Transparency: The Key to Better Governance? Oxford: The British Academy by Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Margetts, H. Z. (2011) Experiments for Public Management Research. Public Management Review, 13 pp189–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthes, M. (2008). The Des Moines Experience with Citizen-Informed Performance Measurement and Reporting. National Civic Review, 97 pp13–20.
   Google Scholar
• National Performance Management Advisory Commission. (2010) A Performance Management Framework for State and Local Government: From Measurement and Reporting to Management and Improving. Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• New Jersey Department of Education. (2010) 2009–2010 School Report Card. Trenton, NJ. Available at http://education.state.nj.us/rc/rc10/index.html (accessed 16 November 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Pavlov, A. and Bourne, M. (2011) Explaining the Effects of Performance Measurement on Performance: An Organizational Routines Perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31 pp101–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piotrowski, S. J. (2003) ‘Governmental Transparency and the National Performance Review: Implementing the Freedom of Information Act’. Dissertation, American University.
   Google Scholar
• Piotrowski, S. J. and Van Ryzin, G. G. (2007) Citizen Attitudes Toward Transparency in Local Government. American Review of Public Administration, 37 pp306–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. and Hupe, P. (2011) Talking about Government: The Role of Magic Concepts. Public Management Review, 13 pp641–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pride, R. A. (2002) How Critical Events Rather Than Performance Trends Shape Public Evaluations of the Schools. Urban Review, 34 pp159–78.
   Google Scholar
• Public Sector Acounting Board. (2007) Public Performance Reporting: Guide to Preparing Public Performance Reports, Toronto, ON: Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants.
   Google Scholar
• Remler, D. K. and Van Ryzin, G.G. (2010) Research Methods in Practice, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, C. E. and Height, R. (1988) Accountability and Performance Incentives for School Principals. Public Productivity & Review, 12 pp15–27.
   Google Scholar
• Ridley, C. E. and Simon, H. A. (1943) Public Education. Measuring Municipal Activities: A Survey of Suggested Criteria for Appraising Administration (2nd edn). Chicago, IL: International City Managers Association.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, A. (2006) Blacked Out: Government Secrecy in the Information Age, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubenstein, R., Schawartz, A. E. and Stiefel, L. (2003) Better than Raw: A Guide To Measuring Organizational Performance with Adjusted Performance Measures. Public Administration Review, 63 pp607–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. and Ridley, C. E. (1938) Trends in Municipal Reporting. Public Opinion Quarterly, 2 pp465–68.
   Google Scholar
• Suls, J., Chambers, J., Krizan, Z., Mortensen, C. R., Koestner, B. and Bruchmann, K. (2010) Testing Four Explanations for the Better/Worse-than-Average Effect: Single-and Multi-Item Entities as Comparison Targets and Referents. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 113 pp62–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilbury, C. (2006) Accountability via Performance Measurement: The Case of Child Protection Services. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 65 pp48–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dooren, W., Bouckaert, G. and Halligan, J. (2010) Performance Management in the Public Sector, New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ryzin, G. G. (2004) Expectations, Performance, and Citizen Satisfaction with Urban Services. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23 pp433–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M., Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., Meier, K. J. and O’Toole, L. J. J. (2010) Wakeup Call: Strategic Management, Network Alarms, and Performance. Public Administration Review, 70 pp731–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willcox, W. F. (1896) Methods of Determining the Economic Productivity of Municipal Enterprises. American Journal of Sociology, 2 pp378–91.
   Google Scholar
• Wohlstetter, P., Nayfack, M. B. and Mora-Flores, E. (2008) Charter Schools and “Customer” Satisfaction: Lessons from Field Testing a Parent Survey. Journal of School Choice, 2 pp66–84.
   Google Scholar
• Yockey, M. D. and Kruml, S. M. (2009) Everything is Relative, but Relative to What? Defining and Identifying Reference Points. Journal of Business and Management, 15 pp95–109.
   Google Scholar
• York, A. S. and Mccarthy, K. A. (2011) Patient, Staff and Physician Satisfaction: A New Model, Instrument and their Implications. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 24 pp178–91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar