Public Leadership: A review of the literature and framework for future research

References

• Aberbach, J. D., and T. Christensen. 2005. “Citizens and Consumers.” Public Management Review 7 (2): 226–245.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, J. A. 2010. “Public Versus Private Managers: How Public and Private Managers Differ in Leadership Behavior.” Public Administration Review 70 (1): 131–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., and G. A. Boyne. 2010. “Capacity, Leadership, and Organizational Performance: Testing the Black Box Model of Public Management.” Public Administration Review 70 (3): 443–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., G. A. Boyne, J. Law, and R. M. Walker. 2011. “Strategy Implementation and Public Service Performance.” Administration & Society 43 (6): 643–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au, C.-F. 1996. “Rethinking Organizational Effectiveness: Theoretical and Methodological Issues in the Study of Organizational Effectiveness for Social Welfare Organizations.” Administration in Social Work 20 (4): 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avellaneda, C. N. 2009. “Mayoral Quality and Local Public Finance.” Public Administration Review 69 (3): 469–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awortwi, N. 2010. “Building New Competences for Government Administrators and Managers in an Era of Public Sector Reforms: The Case of Mozambique.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 76 (4): 723–748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzelay, M., and B. J. Armajani. 1992. Breaking Through Bureaucracy: A New Vision for Managing in Government. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bass, B. M. 1996. A New Paradigm of Leadership: An Inquiry into Transformational Leadership. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Behn, R. D. 1998. “What Right Do Public Managers Have to Lead?” Public Administration Review 58 (3): 209–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behn, R. D. 2010. “Collaborating for Performance: Or Can There Exist Such a Thing as CollaborationStat?” International Public Management Journal 13 (4): 429–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezes, P. 2001. “Defensive Versus Offensive Approaches to Administrative Reform in France (1988–1997): The Leadership Dilemmas of French Prime Ministers.” Governance – an International Journal of Policy and Administration 14 (1): 99–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake, R. R., and J. S. Mouton. 1964. The Managerial Grid. 2nd ed. Houston, TX: Gulf.
   Google Scholar
• Bligh, M. C. 2011. “Followership and Follower-Centred Approaches.” In The Sage Handbook of Leadership, edited by A. Bryman, D. Collinson, K. Grint, B. Jackson and M. Uhl-Bien. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., and M. G. Everett. 1999. “Models of Core/Periphery Structures.” Social Networks 21 (4): 375–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borins, S. F. 1998. Innovating with Integrity: How Local Heroes are Transforming American Government. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyne, G., and J. Dahya. 2002. “Executive Succession and the Performance of Public Organizations.” Public Administration 80 (1): 179–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. 1987. All Organizations are Public: Bridging Public and Private Organizational Theories. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., and S. Moulton. 2011. “Integrative Publicness: A Framework for Public Management Strategy and Performance.” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 21 (Suppl. 3): i363–i380.
   Google Scholar
• Brudney, J. L., and D. S. Wright. 2002. “Revisiting Administrative Reform in the American States: The Status of Reinventing Government During the 1990s.” Public Administration Review 62 (3): 353–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, B. F., and B. C. Costello. 2005. “The Human Side of Managing for Results.” American Review of Public Administration 35 (3): 270–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrell, G., and G. Morgan. 1979. Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, Y. J., and J. W. Lee. 2011. “Perceived Trustworthiness of Supervisors, Employee Satisfaction and Cooperation.” Public Management Review 13 (7): 941–965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, Y. J., and E. J. Ringquist. 2011. “Managerial Trustworthiness and Organizational Outcomes.” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 21 (1): 53–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, S. O. 2008. “Emergency Management: Implications from a Strategic Management Perspective.” Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 5 (1): 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, L.-C., and C.-C. Lai. 2011. “A Research on the Influence of Leadership Style and Job Characteristics on Job Performance Among Accountants of County and City Government in Taiwan.” Public Personnel Management 40 (2): 101–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, Y. H., and H. G. Rainey. 2005. “Goal Ambiguity in US Federal Agencies.” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 15 (1): 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cristofoli, D., G. Nasi, A. Turrini, and G. Valotti. 2011. “Civil Service Reforms in Italy: The Importance of External Endorsement and Administrative Leadership.” Governance – an International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions 24 (2): 261–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby, B. C., and J. M. Bryson. 2005. Leadership for the Common Good: Tackling Public Problems in a Shared-Power World. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Currie, G., M. Humphreys, D. Ucbasaran, and S. McManus. 2008. “Entrepreneurial Leadership in the English Public Sector: Paradox or Possibility?” Public Administration 86 (4): 987–1008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damanpour, F., and M. Schneider. 2010. “Characteristics of Innovation and Innovation Adoption in Public Organizations: Assessing the Role of Managers.” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 19 (3): 495–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Leon, L., and R. B. Denhardt. 2000. “The Political Theory of Reinvention.” Public Administration Review 60 (2): 89–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denhardt, J. V., and K. B. Campbell. 2006. “The Role of Democratic Values in Transformational Leadership.” Administration & Society 38 (5): 556–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denis, J.-L., A. Langley, and L. Rouleau. 2005. “Rethinking Leadership in Public Organizations.” In The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, edited by E. Ferlie, L. E. Lynn Jr, and C. Pollitt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dobel, J. P. 1995. “Managerial Leadership in Divided Times.” Administration & Society 26 (4): 488–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobel, J. P. 1998. “Political Prudence and the Ethics of Leadership.” Public Administration Review 58 (1): 74–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dull, M. 2009. “Results-Model Reform Leadership: Questions of Credible Commitment.” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 19 (2): 255–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durant, R. F. 2008. “Sharpening a Knife Cleverly: Organizational Change, Policy Paradox, and the ‘Weaponizing’ of Administrative Reforms.” Public Administration Review 68 (2): 282–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferlie, E. 2012. “Concluding Discussion. Paradigms and Instruments of Public Management Reform – the Question of Agency.” In Leadership in the Public Sector. Promises and Pitfalls, edited by C. Teelken, E. Ferlie, and M. Dent. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, S. 2005. “Developing and Testing an Integrative Framework of Public Sector Leadership: Evidence From the Public Education Arena.” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 15 (2): 197–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederickson, H. G. 1997. The Spirit of Public Administration. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, B. S. 2003. “Publishing as Prostitution? – Choosing Between One’s Own Ideas and Academic Success.” Public Choice 116 (1/2): 205–223.
   Google Scholar
• Getha-Taylor, H., M. H. Holmes, W. S. Jacobson, R. S. Morse, and J. E. Sowa. 2011. “Focusing the Public Leadership Lens: Research Propositions and Questions in the Minnowbrook Tradition.” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 21 (Suppl. 1): i83–i97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, G. R., and A. Hyde. 1988. “Followership and the Federal Worker.” Public Administration Review 48 (6): 962–968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, S., and W. D. Eggers. 2004. Governing by Network: The New Shape of the Public Sector. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graen, G. B., and M. Uhl-Bien. 1995. “The Relationship-Based Approach to Leadership: Development of LMX Theory of Leadership Over 25 Years: Applying a Multi-Level, Multi-Domain Perspective.” Leadership Quarterly 6 (2): 219–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenacre, M. J. 1984. Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. R., and A. R. Villadsen. 2010. “Comparing Public and Private Managers’ Leadership Styles: Understanding the Role of Job Context.” International Public Management Journal 13 (3): 247–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. B. 2011. “Antecedents of Organizational Innovation: The Diffusion of New Public Management into Danish Local Government.” Public Administration 89 (2): 285–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, J., and A. M. Khademian. 2010. “Culture Change Refined and Revitalized: The Road Show and Guides for Pragmatic Action.” Public Administration Review 70 (6): 845–856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessey Jr, J. T 1998. “‘Reinventing’ Government: Does Leadership Make the Difference?” Public Administration Review 58 (6): 522–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooijberg, R., and J. Choi. 2001. “The Impact of Organizational Characteristics on Leadership Effectiveness Models: An Examination of Leadership in a Private and a Public Sector Organization.” Administration & Society 33 (4): 403–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosking, D. M. 2011. “Moving Relationality: Mediations on a Relational Approach to Leadership.” In The Sage Handbook of Leadership, edited by A. Bryman, D. Collinson, K. Grint, B. Jackson, and M. Uhl-Bien. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• House, R. J., and T. R. Mitchell. 1974. “Path-Goal Theory of Leadership.” Contemporary Business 3 (Fall): 81–98.
   Google Scholar
• Huxham, C., and S. E. Vangen. 2005. Managing to Collaborate: The Theory and Practice of Collaborative Advantage. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, W. S., C. K. Palus, and C. J. Bowling. 2010. “A Woman’s Touch? Gendered Management and Performance in State Administration.” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 20 (2): 477–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarneving, B. 2005. “A Comparison of Two Bibliometric Methods for Mapping of the Research Front.” Scientometrics 65 (2): 245–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaskyte, K., and W. W. Dressier. 2005. “Organizational Culture and Innovation in Nonprofit Human Service Organizations.” Administration in Social Work 29 (2): 23–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joaquin, M. E. 2009. “Bureaucratic Adaptation and the Politics of Multiple Principals in Policy Implementation.” American Review of Public Administration 39 (3): 246–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce, P. 2012. Strategic Leadership in the Public Services. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, K., M. J. Moon, and S. D. Hahm. 2008. “Exploring the Linkage Between Ministerial Leadership and Performance in Korea.” Administration & Society 40 (7): 667–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalu, K. N. 2003. “Entrepreneurs of Conservators? Contractarian Principles of Bureaucratic Performance.” Administration & Society 35 (5): 539–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, J., and H. Patapan. 2006. “In Search of Prudence: The Hidden Problem of Managerial Reform.” Public Administration Review 66 (5): 711–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapucu, N., and M. Van Wart. 2008. “Making Matters Worse an Anatomy of Leadership Failures in Managing Catastrophic Events.” Administration & Society 40 (7): 711–740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler, M. M. 1963. “Bibliographic Coupling Between Scientific Papers.” American Documentation 14 (1): 10–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. E., and G. W. Chang. 2009. “An Empirical Analysis of Innovativeness in Government: Findings and Implications.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 75 (2): 293–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. E., and J. W. Lee. 2009. “The Impact of Management Capacity on Government Innovation in Korea: An Empirical Study.” International Public Management Journal 12 (3): 345–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirlin, J. J. 1996. “The Big Questions of Public Administration in a Democracy.” Public Administration Review 56 (5): 416–423.
   Google Scholar
• Kotter, J. P. 1990. A Force for Change: How Leadership Differs From Management. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kouzmin, A., and N. Korac-Kakabadse. 2000. “Mapping Institutional Impacts of Lean Communication in Lean Agencies – Information Technology Illiteracy and Leadership Failure.” Administration & Society 32 (1): 29–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronenberg, P., and A. Khademian. 2009. “Beyond ‘Connecting the Dots’: Toward the Strategic Managing of Organizing.” International Public Management Journal 12 (1): 48–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambright, W. H., and M. M. Quinn. 2011. “Understanding Leadership in Public Administration: The Biographical Approach.” Public Administration Review 71 (5): 782–790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. Y., M. J. Moon, and S. D. Hahm. 2010. “Dual Faces of Ministerial Leadership in South Korea: Does Political Responsiveness or Administrative Responsibility Enhance Perceived Ministerial Performance?” Administration & Society 42 (Suppl. 1): 77S–101S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, P. C. 1998. Sustaining Innovation: Creating Nonprofit and Government Organizations That Innovate Naturally. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, J. S. 1998. Catalytic Leadership: Strategies for an Interconnected World. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Marini, F. 1971. Toward a New Public Administration: The Minnowbrook Perspective. Scranton, PA: Chandler.
   Google Scholar
• Mary, N. L. 2005. “Transformational Leadership in Human Service Organizations.”Administration in Social Work 29 (2): 105–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCain, K. W. 1990. “Mapping Authors in Intellectual Space – a Technical Overview.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 41 (6): 433–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, M., and C. Silvia. 2009. “Does Leadership in Networks Matter? Examining the Effect of Leadership Behaviors on Managers’ Perceptions of Network Effectiveness.” Public Performance & Management Review 33 (1): 34–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mingers, J., and H. Willmott. 2013. “Taylorizing Business School Research: On the ‘One Best Way’ Performative Effects of Journal Ranking Lists.” Human Relations 66 (8): 1051–1073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe, R. C. 1994. “The ‘Reinventing Government’ Exercise: Misinterpreting the Problem, Misjudging the Consequences.” Public Administration Review 54 (2): 111–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohr, L. B. 1969. “Determinants of Innovation in Organizations.” American Political Science Review 63 (1): 111–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, J. 1995. “Innovative Leadership and Policy Change: Lessons from Thatcher.” Governance – an International Journal of Policy and Administration 8 (1): 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, M. J., and P. de Leon. 2001. “Municipal Reinvention: Managerial Values and Diffusion Among Municipalities.” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 11 (3): 327–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, R. S. and T. F. Buss, eds. 2008. Innovations in Public Leadership Development. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, R. S., T. F. Buss, and C. M. Kinghorn. 2007. Transforming Public Leadership for the 21st Century. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. A. 2005. “Why and How Do State Governments Adopt and Implement ‘Managing for Results’ Reforms?” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 15 (2): 219–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ospina, S., and E. Foldy. 2010. “Building Bridges from the Margins: The Work of Leadership in Social Change Organizations.” Leadership Quarterly 21 (2): 292–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ospina, S., and M. Uhl-Bien. 2012. “Exploring the Competing Bases for Legitimacy in Contemporary Leadership Studies.” In Advancing Relational Leadership Research. A Dialogue Among Perspectives, edited by M. Uhl-Bien and S. Ospina. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Ospina, S. M., and J. Dodge. 2005. “It’s About Time: Catching Method up to Meaning – the Usefulness of Narrative Inquiry in Public Administration Research.” Public Administration Review 65 (2): 143–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouchi, W. G. 1981. Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Paarlberg, L. E., and B. Lavigna. 2010. “Transformational Leadership and Public Service Motivation: Driving Individual and Organizational Performance.” Public Administration Review 70 (5): 710–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S. M., and H. G. Rainey. 2008. “Leadership and Public Service Motivation in US Federal Agencies.” International Public Management Journal 11 (1): 109–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L., A. Hondeghem, and L. R. Wise. 2010. “Revisiting the Motivational Bases of Public Service: Twenty Years of Research and an Agenda for the Future.” Public Administration Review 70 (5): 681–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raffel, J. A., P. Leisink, and A. E. Middlebrooks. eds. 2009a. “Introduction.” In Public Sector Leadership: International Challenges and Perspectives. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Raffel, J. A., P. Leisink, and A. E. Middlebrooks, eds. 2009b. Public Sector Leadership: International Challenges and Perspectives. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G., and Y. H. Chun. 2005. “Public and Private Management Compared.” In The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, edited by E. Ferlie, L. E. Lynn, and C. Pollitt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G., S. Pandey, and B. Bozeman. 1995. “Research Note: Public and Private Managers’ Perceptions of Red Tape.” Public Administration Review 55 (6): 567–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riccucci, N. M., M. K. Meyers, I. Lurie, and J. S. Han. 2004. “The Implementation of Welfare Reform Policy: The Role of Public Managers in Front-Line Practices.” Public Administration Review 64 (4): 438–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritz, A. 2009. “Public Service Motivation and Organizational Performance in Swiss Federal Government.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 75 (1): 53–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritz, A., A. Shantz, K. Alfes, and A. S. Arshoff. 2012. “Who Needs Leaders the Most? The Interactive Effect of Leadership and Core Self-Evaluations on Commitment to Change in the Public Sector.” International Public Management Journal 15 (2): 160–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, P. J., and T. Shui-Yan. 1995. “The Role of Commitment in Collective Action: Comparing the Organizational Behavior and Rational Choice Perspectives.” Public Administration Review 55 (1): 67–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowold, J., and A. Rohmann. 2009. “Transformational and Transactional Leadership Styles, Followers’ Positive and Negative Emotions, and Performance in German Nonprofit Orchestras.” Nonprofit Management & Leadership 20 (1): 41–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, C. M. 2001. “Leadership in Collaborative Policy-Making: An Analysis of Agency Roles in Regulatory Negotiations.” Policy Sciences 34 (3/4): 221–245.
   Google Scholar
• Sanger, M. B. 2008. “From Measurement to Management: Breaking Through the Barriers to State and Local Performance.” Public Administration Review 68 (Suppl. 1): S70–S85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saz-Carranza, A., and S. M. Ospina. 2011. “The Behavioral Dimension of Governing Interorganizational Goal-Directed Networks – Managing the Unity-Diversity Tension” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 21 (2): 327–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selznick, P. 1949. TVA and the Grass Roots: A Study in the Sociology of Formal Organization. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, A., J. Baird, and J. Alford. 1993. “What Do Chief Administrators Do? Findings from Victoria.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 52 (1): 12–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, H. C. 1973. “Co-Citation in the Scientific Literature: A New Measure of the Relationship Between Two Documents.” Journal of the American Society of Information Science 24 (4): 265–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stazyk, E. C., S. K. Pandey, and B. E. Wright. 2011. “Understanding Affective Organizational Commitment: The Importance of Institutional Context.” American Review of Public Administration 41 (6): 603–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teelken, C. 2012. “Introduction: An Overview and Conceptualization.” In Leadership in the Public Sector. Promises and Pitfalls, edited by C. Teelken, E. Ferlie, and M. Dent. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Teelken, C., E. Ferlie, and M. Dent. eds. 2012. Leaderhsip in the Public Sector. Promises and Pitfalls. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Terry, L. D. 1990. “Leadership in the Administrative State.” Administration & Society 21 (4): 395–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry, L. D. 1998. “Administrative Leadership, Neo-Managerialism, and the Public Management Movement.” Public Administration Review 58 (3): 194–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry, L. D. 2005. “The Thinning of Administrative Institutions in the Hollow State.” Administration & Society 37 (4): 426–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trice, H. M., and J. M. Beyer. 1993. The Cultures of Work Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Trottier, T., M. Van Wart, and X. Wang. 2008. “Examining the Nature and Significance of Leadership in Government Organizations.” Public Administration Review 68 (2): 319–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhl-Bien, M. 2006. “Relational Leadership Theory: Exploring the Social Processes of Leadership and Organizing.” Leadership Quarterly 17 (6): 654–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valle, M. 1999. “Crisis, Culture and Charisma: The New Leader’s Work in Public Organizations.” Public Personnel Management 28 (2): 245–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T. 2004. “Descriptive Versus Evaluative Bibliometrics. Monitoring and Assessing of National R&D Systems.” In Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems, edited by H. Moed, W. Glänzel, and U. Schmoch. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Van Slyke, D. M., and R. W. Alexander. 2006. “Public Service Leadership: Opportunities for Clarity and Coherence.” American Review of Public Administration 36 (4): 362–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wart, M. 2003. “Public-Sector Leadership Theory: An Assessment.” Public Administration Review 63 (2): 214–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wart, M. 2011. Dynamics of Leadership in Public Service: Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Van Wart, M. 2013. “Administrative Leadership Theory: A Reassessment After 10 Years.” Public Administration 91 (3): 521–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wart, M., and L. A. Dicke. 2008. “Introduction.” In Administrative Leadership in the Public Sector, edited by M. Van Wart and L. A. Dicke. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharp.
   Google Scholar
• Van Wart, M., and N. Kapucu. 2011. “Crisis Management Competencies.” Public Management Review 13 (4): 489–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeek, A., K. Debackere, M. Luwel, and E. Zimmermann. 2002. “Measuring Progress and Evolution in Science and Technology – I: The Multiple Uses of Bibliometric Indicators.” International Journal of Management Reviews 4 (2): 179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinzant, J., and L. Crothers. 1996. “Street-Level Leadership: Rethinking the Role of Public Servants in Contemporary Governance.” American Review of Public Administration 26 (4): 457–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, R. Forthcoming. “What Happened to the Public Organization? A Bibliometric Analysis of Public Administration and Organization Studies.” American Review of Public Administration.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, R., and W. H. Güttel. 2013. “The Dynamic Capability View in Strategic Management: A Bibliometric Analysis.” International Journal of Management Reviews 15: 426–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogelsang-Coombs, V., and M. Miller. 1999. “Developing the Governance Capacity of Local Elected Officials.” Public Administration Review 59 (3): 199–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, M., and M. Tomlinson. 2010. “Contextualizing Leader Dynamics: How Public Service Leaders Endeavour to Build Influence.” Leadership 6 (1): 21–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallis, J., and L. McLoughlin. 2007. “A Diagnosis of Leadership Effectiveness in the Irish Public Sector.” Public Management Review 9 (3): 327–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., and K. Faust. 2009. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. 18th print. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, E., and A. M. Khademian. 2008. “Managing Collaborative Processes: Common Practices, Uncommon Circumstances.” Administration & Society 40 (5): 431–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, P. J. 1994. “A Case Survey of Bureaucratic Effectiveness in U.S. Cabinet Agencies: Preliminary Results.” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 3 (2): 161–181.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B. E., and S. K. Pandey. 2010. “Transformational Leadership in the Public Sector: Does Structure Matter?” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 20 (1): 75–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yammarino, F. J., S. D. Dionne, J. U. Chun, and F. Dansereau. 2005. “Leadership and Levels of Analysis: A State-of-the-Science Review.” Leadership Quarterly 16 (6): 879–919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yukl, G. A. 2010. Leadership in Organizations. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar