Great Expectations of Public Service Delegation: A systematic review

REFERENCES

• Albalate, D., G. Bel, and X. Fageda. 2009. “Privatization and Regulatory Reform of Toll Motorways in Europe.” Governance 22 (2): 295–318. doi:10.1111/gove.2009.22.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amirkhanyan, A. A. 2006. “The Smart-Seller Challenge: Exploring the Determinants of Privatizing Public Nursing Homes.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17 (3): 501–527. doi:10.1093/jopart/mul009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, K. P., and E. Ostrom. 2008. “Analyzing Decentralized Resource Regimes from a Polycentric Perspective.” Policy Sciences 41 (1): 71–93. doi:10.1007/s11077-007-9055-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R. 2010. “NPM and the Search for Efficiency.” In The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management, edited by T. Christensen and P. Lægreid, 282–294. Ashgate Research Companion. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Batory, A. 2012. “Political Cycles and Organizational Life Cycles: Delegation to Anticorruption Agencies in Central Europe: Delegation to Anticorruption Agencies.” Governance 25 (4): 639–660. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01599.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battaglio, R. P. Jr, and J. S. Legge Jr. 2009. “Self-Interest, Ideological/Symbolic Politics, and Citizen Characteristics: A Cross-National Analysis of Support for Privatization.” Public Administration Review 69 (4): 697–709. doi:10.1111/puar.2009.69.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., and X. Fageda. 2009. “Factors Explaining Local Privatization: A Meta-Regression Analysis.” Public Choice 139 (1–2): 105–119. doi:10.1007/s11127-008-9381-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., X. Fageda, and M. Mur. 2012. “Does Cooperation Reduce Service Delivery Costs? Evidence from Residential Solid Waste Services.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24 (1): 85–107. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., X. Fageda, and M. E.Warner. 2010. “Is Private Production of Public Services Cheaper than Public Production? A Meta-Regression Analysis of Solid Waste and Water Services.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 29 (3): 553–577. doi:10.1002/pam.20509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benish, A., and D. Levi-Faur. 2012. “New Forms of Administrative Law in the Age of Third-Party Government.” Public Administration 90 (4): 886–900. doi:10.1111/padm.2012.90.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertelli, A. M. 2005. “Governing the Quango: An Auditing and Cheating Model of Quasi-Governmental Authorities.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16 (2): 239–261. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertelli, A. M. 2006a. “The Role of Political Ideology in the Structural Design of New Governance Agencies.” Public Administration Review 66 (4): 583–595. doi:10.1111/puar.2006.66.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertelli, A. M. 2006b. “Delegating to the Quango: Ex Ante and Ex Post Ministerial Constraints.” Governance19 (2): 229–249. doi:10.1111/gove.2006.19.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilodeau, N., C. Laurin, and A. Vining. 2006. “‘Choice of Organizational Form Makes a Real Difference’: The Impact of Corporatization on Government Agencies in Canada.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17 (1): 119–147. doi:10.1093/jopart/mul014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birner, R., and H. Wittmer. 2006. “Better Public Sector Governance through Partnership with the Private Sector and Civil Society: The Case of Guatemala’s Forest Administration.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 72 (4): 459–472. doi:10.1177/0020852306070077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borzutzky, S. 2005. “From Chicago to Santiago: Neoliberalism and Social Security Privatization in Chile.” Governance 18 (4): 655–674. doi:10.1111/gove.2005.18.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breul, J. D. 2010. “Practitioner’s Perspective—Improving Sourcing Decisions.”Public Administration Review70: 193–200. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02272.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkerhoff, D. W., and R. W.Johnson. 2009. “Decentralized Local Governance in Fragile States: Learning from Iraq.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 75 (4): 585–607. doi:10.1177/0020852309349424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., and M. Potoski. 2003a. “Contract-Management Capacity in Municipal and County Governments.” Public Administration Review 63 (2): 153–164. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., and M. Potoski. 2003b. “Transaction Costs and Institutional Explanations for Government Service Production Decisions.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13 (4): 441–468. doi:10.1093/jopart/mug030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., M. Potoski, and D. M. Van Slyke. 2006. “Managing Public Service Contracts: Aligning Values, Institutions, and Markets.” Public Administration Review 66 (3): 323–331. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00590.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., and M. Potoski.2004. “Managing the Public Service Market.”Public Administration Review 64 (6): 656–668. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00413.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, R. 2010. “Redefining Political-Administrative Relationships in South Africa.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 76 (4): 676–701. doi:10.1177/0020852310381204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, B., A. Danford, D. Howcroft, H. Richardson, A. Smith, and P. Taylor. 2013. “Taxing Times: Lean Working and the Creation of (In)efficiencies In HM Revenue and Customs.” Public Administration 91 (1): 83–97. doi:10.1111/padm.2013.91.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassell, M. 2001. “Privatization and the Courts: How Judicial Structures Shaped German Privatization.” Governance 14 (4): 429–455. doi:10.1111/gove.2001.14.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caulfield, J. L. 2006. “Local Government Reform in China: A Rational Actor Perspective.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 72 (2): 253–267. doi:10.1177/0020852306064613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., and P. Lægreid. 2003. “Coping with Complex Leadership Roles: The Problematic Redefinition of Government-Owned Enterprises.” Public Administration 81 (4): 803–831. doi:10.1111/padm.2003.81.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., and P. Lægreid. 2007. “The Whole-of-Government Approach to Public Sector Reform.” Public Administration Review 67 (6): 1059–1066. doi:10.1111/puar.2007.67.issue-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, F. 2010. “Analysing Decentralised Natural Resource Governance: Proposition for a ‘Politicised’ Institutional Analysis and Development Framework.” Policy Sciences 43 (2): 129–156. doi:10.1007/s11077-009-9100-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coggburn, J. D. 2005. “The Benefits of Human Resource Centralization: Insights from a Survey of Human Resource Directors in a Decentralized State.” Public Administration Review 65 (4): 424–435. doi:10.1111/puar.2005.65.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corder, J. K., and S. M. Hoffmann. 2004. “Privatizing Federal Credit Programs: Why Sallie Mae?” Public Administration Review 64 (2): 180–191. doi:10.1111/puar.2004.64.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., I.-M. Garcia-Sanchez, and J.-M. Prado-Lorenzo. 2013. “Determinants of Functional Decentralization and Their Relation to Debt: Empirical Evidence Based on the Analysis of Spanish Municipalities.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 79 (4): 701–723. doi:10.1177/0020852313501246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dan, S. 2014. “The Effects of Agency Reform in Europe: A Review of the Evidence.” Public Policy and Administration, 29 (3): 221–240. doi:10.1177/0952076713517412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., and W. W. Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragos, D. C., and B. Neamtu. 2007. “Reforming Local Public Administration in Romania: Trends and Obstacles.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 73 (4): 629–648. doi:10.1177/0020852307083464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M., and J. Trondal. 2009. “Political Leadership and Bureaucratic Autonomy: Effects of Agencification.” Governance 22 (4): 673–688. doi:10.1111/gove.2009.22.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteller-Moré, A., and J. Polo Otero. 2012. “Fiscal Transparency: (Why) Does Your Local Government Respond?” Public Management Review 14 (8): 1153–1173. doi:10.1080/14719037.2012.657839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flinders, M. 2004. “Distributed Public Governance in Britain.” Public Administration 82 (4): 883–909. doi:10.1111/padm.2004.82.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flinders, M. 2009. “The Politics of Patronage in the United Kingdom: Shrinking Reach and Diluted Permeation.” Governance 22 (4): 547–570. doi:10.1111/gove.2009.22.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitag, M., and R. Schlicht. 2009. “Educational Federalism in Germany: Foundations of Social Inequality in Education.” Governance 22 (1): 47–72. doi:10.1111/gove.2009.22.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilardi, F. 2008. Delegation in the Regulatory State: Independent Regulatory Agencies in Western Europe. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Girth, A. M., A. Hefetz, J. M. Johnston, and M. E. Warner. 2012. “Outsourcing Public Service Delivery: Management Responses in Noncompetitive Markets.” Public Administration Review. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02596.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Gómez, F., A. J. Picazo-Tadeo, and J. Guardiola. 2011. “Why Do Local Governments Privatize the Provision of Water Services? Empirical Evidence from Spain.” Public Administration 89 (2): 471–492. doi:10.1111/padm.2011.89.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M., and J. Grix. 2011. “Bringing Structures Back In: The ‘Governance Narrative’, the ‘Decentred Approach’ and ‘Asymmetrical Network Governance’ in the Education and Sport Policy Communities.” Public Administration 89 (2): 537–556. doi:10.1111/padm.2011.89.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossi, G., and C. Reichard. 2008. “Municipal Corporatization in Germany and Italy.” Public Management Review 10: 597–617. doi:10.1080/14719030802264275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guess, G. M. 2005. “Comparative Decentralization Lessons from Pakistan, Indonesia, and the Philippines.” Public Administration Review 65 (2): 217–230. doi:10.1111/puar.2005.65.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handley, D. M. 2008. “Strengthening the Intergovernmental Grant System: Long-Term Lessons for the Federal–Local Relationship.” Public Administration Review 68 (1): 126–136. doi:10.1111/puar.2008.68.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hefetz, A., and M. E. Warner. 2004. “Privatization and Its Reverse: Explaining the Dynamics of the Government Contracting Process.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14 (2): 171–190. doi:10.1093/jopart/muh012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hira, A., D. Huxtable, and A. Leger. 2005. “Deregulation and Participation: An International Survey of Participation in Electricity Regulation.” Governance 18 (1): 53–88. doi:10.1111/gove.2005.18.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge, G. A. 2000. Privatization : An International Review of Performance. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, G. A., and K. Coghill. 2007. “Accountability in the Privatized State.” Governance 20 (4): 675–702. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00377.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. 1991. “A Public Management for All Seasons?” Public Administration 69 (1): 3–19. doi:10.1111/padm.1991.69.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. 2011. The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy, and Self-Preservation in Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., and M. W. Jackson. 1991. Administrative Argument. Aldershot, England: Dartmouth.
   Google Scholar
• James, O., N. Petrovsky, A. Moseley, and G. A. Boyne. 2015. “The Politics of Agency Death: Ministers and the Survival of Government Agencies in a Parliamentary System.” British Journal of Political Science: 1–22. doi:10.1017/S0007123414000477.
   Google Scholar
• James, O., and S. Van Thiel. 2011. “Structural Devolution to Agencies.” In The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management, edited by T. Christensen and P. Lægreid. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Kelleher, C. A., and S. W. Yackee. 2008. “A Political Consequence of Contracting: Organized Interests and State Agency Decision Making.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19 (3): 579–602. doi:10.1093/jopart/mun014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkhaug, R., and K. H. Mikalsen. 2009. “Coping with Autonomy: Antecedents of Interaction between Bureaucrats and Politicians.” Public Management Review 11 (2): 137–154. doi:10.1080/14719030802685735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox, C., and P. Carmichael. 2006. “Bureau Shuffling? The Review of Public Administration in Northern Ireland.” Public Administration 84 (4): 941–965. doi:10.1111/padm.2006.84.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. 1980. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kuditshini, J. T. 2008. “Global Governance and Local Government in the Congo: The Role of the IMF, World Bank, the Multinationals and the Political Elites.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 74 (2): 195–216. doi:10.1177/0020852308090773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letza, S. R., C. Smallman, and X. Sun. 2004. “Reframing Privatisation: Deconstructing the Myth of Efficiency.” Policy Sciences 37 (2): 159–183. doi:10.1023/B:OLIC.0000048530.30139.98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majone, G. 2001. “Two Logics of Delegation: Agency and Fiduciary Relations in EU Governance.” European Union Politics 2 (1): 103–122. doi:10.1177/1465116501002001005.
   Google Scholar
• Majone, G. 2002. “The European Commission: The Limits of Centralization and the Perils of Parliamentarization.” Governance 15 (3): 375–392. doi:10.1111/gove.2002.15.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloney, W. A. 2001. “Regulation in an Episodic Policy-Making Environment: The Water Industry in England and Wales.” Public Administration 79 (3): 625–642. doi:10.1111/padm.2001.79.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marvel, M. K., and H. P. Marvel. 2007. “Outsourcing Oversight: A Comparison of Monitoring for In-House and Contracted Services.” Public Administration Review 67 (3): 521–530. doi:10.1111/puar.2007.67.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, D. C., E. Reeves, and T. Turner. 2011. “Changing the Rules of the Game: The Impact of Privatization on Firm Industrial Relations.” Public Management Review 13 (6): 845–860. doi:10.1080/14719037.2010.539114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, K. 2002. “Rational Fictions: Central Bank Independence and the Social Logic of Delegation.” West European Politics 25 (1): 47–76. doi:10.1080/713601585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, R. E., and G. Hammerschmid. 2010. “The Degree of Decentralization and Individual Decision Making in Central Government Human Resource Management: A European Comparative Perspective.” Public Administration 88(2): 455–478. doi:10.1111/padm.2010.88.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milward, H. B., and K. G. Provan. 2000. “Governing the Hollow State.” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 10 (2): 359–380. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024273.
   Google Scholar
• Moher, D., A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, and D. G. Altman. 2009. “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement.” Annals of Internal Medicine 151 (4): 264–269. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohr, R., S. C. Deller, and J. M. Halstead. 2010. “Alternative Methods of Service Delivery in Small and Rural Municipalities.” Public Administration Review 70 (6): 894–905. doi:10.1111/puar.2010.70.issue-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, M. J., and P. deLeon. 2001. “Municipal Reinvention: Managerial Values and Diffusion among Municipalities.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11 (3): 327–352. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mörth, U. 2009. “The Market Turn in EU Governance – The Emergence of Public-Private Collaboration.” Governance 22 (1): 99–120. doi:10.1111/gove.2009.22.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. 2006. “Ambiguity in Policy Lessons: The Agencification Experience.” Public Administration 84 (4): 1029–1050. doi:10.1111/padm.2006.84.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemec, J., and N. Kolisnichenko. 2006. “Market-Based Health Care Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe: Lessons after Ten Years of Change.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 72 (1): 11–26. doi:10.1177/0020852306061611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niskanen, W. A. 1971. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago, IL: Aldine, Atherton.
   Google Scholar
• Norgaard, A. S. 2003. “Governing Structures and Structured Governing: Local Political Control of Public Services in Denmark.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13 (4): 543–561. doi:10.1093/jopart/mug034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., and T. Gaebler.1992. Reinventing Government : How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector. New York: New American Library.
   Google Scholar
• Overman, S., and S. van Thiel. 2015. “Agencification and Public Sector Performance: A Systematic Comparison in 20 Countries.” Public Management Review. 1–25. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1028973.
   Google Scholar
• Pagnou, S. 2013. “The Role Played by the Judicial Review in Good Governance Processes Linked to Decentralization: The Case of Togo.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 79 (3): 563–579. doi:10.1177/0020852313490612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagoulatos, G. 2001. “The Enemy Within: Intragovernmental Politics and Organizational Failure in Greek Privatization.” Public Administration 79 (1): 125–146. doi:10.1111/padm.2001.79.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, M. M. 2007. “Governing the Chinese Economy: Regulatory Reform in the Service of the State.” Public Administration Review 67 (4): 718–730. doi:10.1111/puar.2007.67.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peckham, S., M. Exworthy, M. Powell, and I. Greener. 2008. “Decentralizing Health Services in the UK: A New Conceptual Framework.” Public Administration 86 (2): 559–580.doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00709.x.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” The American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251–267. doi:10.2307/2586011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack, M. 2002. “Learning from the Americanists (Again): Theory and Method in the Study of Delegation.” West European Politics 25 (1): 200–219. doi:10.1080/713869589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. 1993. Managerialism and the Public Services: Cuts or Cultural Change in the 1990s? 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Business.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. 2005. “Decentralization.” In The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, edited by E. Ferlie, L. E. Lynn, and C. Pollitt, 371–397. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., and G. Bouckaert. 2011. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis: New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., and S. Dan. 2011. “The Impacts of the New Public Management in Europe: A Meta-Analysis.” COCOPS Working Paper, no. 3. http://www.cocops.eu/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/COCOPS_workingpaper_No31.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., and S. Dan. 2013. “Searching for Impacts in Performance-Oriented Management Reform: A Review of the European Literature.” Public Performance &Management Review 37 (1): 7–32. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576370101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potoski, M. 2008. “State and Local Government Procurement and the Winter Commission.” Public Administration Review 68 (October): S58–S69. doi:10.1111/puar.2008.68.issue-s1.
   Google Scholar
• Prager, J. 2008. “Contract City Redux: Weston, Florida, as the Ultimate New Public Management Model City.” Public Administration Review 68 (1): 167–180. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00846.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rho, E. 2013. “Contracting Revisited: Determinants and Consequences of Contracting Out for Public Education Services.” Public Administration Review 73 (2): 327–337. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02682.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, A. 2010. The Logic of Discipline. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195374988.001.0001/acprof-9780195374988.
   Google Scholar
• Rommel, J., and J. Christiaens. 2009. “Steering From Ministers and Departments: Coping Strategies of Agencies in Flanders.” Public Management Review 11 (1): 79–100. doi:10.1080/14719030802493569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savas, E. S. 2002. “Competition and Choice in New York City. Social Services.” Public Administration Review 62 (1): 82–91. doi:10.1111/puar.2002.62.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawer, G. 1983. “Ministerial Responsibility and Quangos.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 42 (1): 73–81. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.1983.tb00949.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R., and J. W. Meyer. 1994. Institutional Environments and Organizations: Structural Complexity and Individualism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sellers, J. M., and A. Lidström. 2007. “Decentralization, Local Government, and the Welfare State.” Governance 20 (4): 609–632. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00374.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smullen, A. 2010. Translating Agency Reform: Rhetoric and Culture in Comparative Perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Snavely, K., and U. Desai. 2001. “Mapping Local Government-Nongovernmental Organization Interactions: A Conceptual Framework.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11 (2): 245–264. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, R. J. 2007. “Does Dispersed Public Ownership Impair Efficiency? The Case of Refuse Collection in Norway.” Public Administration 85 (4): 1045–1058. doi:10.1111/padm.2007.85.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosin, M. R. 2012. “Decentralization, Devolution, Financial Shortfalls, and State Priorities in Service Programs in the Early 2000s.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22 (4): 701–730. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suárez, D. F. 2011. “Collaboration and Professionalization: The Contours of Public Sector Funding for Nonprofit Organizations.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21 (2): 307–326. doi:10.1093/jpart/muq049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thatcher, M. 2002. “Delegation to Independent Regulatory Agencies: Pressures, Functions and Contextual Mediation.” West European Politics 25 (1): 125–147. doi:10.1080/713601588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thatcher, M., and A. S. Sweet. 2002. “Theory and Practice of Delegation to Non-Majoritarian Institutions.” West European Politics 25 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1080/713601583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, M. 2012. “Decentralization, Politics and Service Delivery: The Introduction of One-Stop Shops in Mongolia.” Public Management Review 14 (2): 197–215. doi:10.1080/14719037.2012.657960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Slyke, D. M. 2003. “The Mythology of Privatization in Contracting for Social Services.” Public Administration Review 63 (3): 296–315. doi:10.1111/puar.2003.63.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Thiel, S. 2001. Quangos: Trends, Causes and Consequences. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Van Thiel, S., and K. Yesilkagit. 2011. “Good Neighbours or Distant Friends?: Trust between Dutch Ministries and Their Executive Agencies.” Public Management Review 13 (6): 783–802. doi:10.1080/14719037.2010.539111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoest, K., S. Van Thiel, G. Bouckaert, and P. Lægreid, eds. 2012. Government Agencies: Practices and Lessons from 30 Countries. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E., and G. Bel. 2008. “Competition or Monopoly? Comparing Privatization of Local Public Services in the US and Spain.” Public Administration 86 (3): 723–735.doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00700.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witesman, E. M., and C. R. Wise. 2009. “The Centralization/decentralization Paradox in Civil Service Reform: How Government Structure Affects Democratic Training of Civil Servants.” Public Administration Review 69 (1): 116–127. doi:10.1111/puar.2009.69.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witko, C. 2011. “Campaign Contributions, Access, and Government Contracting.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21 (4): 761–778. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, B. 2004. “Preparing Public Administrators for an Era of Globalization and Decentralization: A Strategic-Contingency Approach.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 70 (2): 385–403. doi:10.1177/0020852304044263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, B. E., and S. K. Pandey. 2008. “Public Service Motivation and the Assumption of Person--Organization Fit: Testing the Mediating Effect of Value Congruence.” Administration & Society 40 (5): 502–521. doi:10.1177/0095399708320187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ya Ni, A., and S. Bretschneider. 2007. “The Decision to Contract Out: A Study of Contracting for E-Government Services in State Governments.” Public Administration Review 67 (3): 531–544. doi:10.1111/puar.2007.67.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yesilkagit, K., and S. Van Thiel. 2011. “Autonomous Agencies and Perceptions of Stakeholder Influence in Parliamentary Democracies.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zullo, R. 2007. “Transit Contracting Reexamined: Determinants of Cost Efficiency and Resource Allocation.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (3): 495–515. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar