Collaborative networks and the need for a new management language

References

• Agranoff, R. 2003. Leveraging Networks: A Guide for Public Managers Working across Organizations. Washington, DC: IBM Endowment for the Business of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Agranoff, R. 2006. “Inside Collaborative Networks: Ten Lessons for Public Managers.” Public Administration Review, Special Issue, Supplement to Issue 66 (s1): 56–65. doi:10.1111/puar.2006.66.issue-s1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agranoff, R., and M. McGuire. 2001. “After the Network is Formed: Processes, Power and Performance.” In Getting Results Through Collaboration: Networks and Network Structures for Public Policy and Management, edited by M.P. Mandell, 11–29. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Agranoff, B., and M. McGuire. 2003. Collaborative Public Management. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anklam, P. 2007. Net Work: A Practical Guide to Creating and Sustaining Networks at Work and in the World. Boston, MA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Annie E. Casey Foundation. 1993. The Path of Most Resistance. Baltimore, MD: Annie E. Casey Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Ashforth, B., and F. Mael. 1989. “Social Identity Theory and the Organization.” Academy of Management Review 14 (1): 20–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, L. 2006. “A Proposal for Archiving Context for Secondary Analysis.” Methodological Innovation Online 1 (2): 10–20. doi:10.4256/mio.
   Google Scholar
• Boorman, C., and G. Woolcock. 2002. “The Goodna Service Integration Project: Government and Community Working Together for Community Well-Being.” In Governing Local Communities: Building State and Community Capacity, edited by T. Reddel. Brisbane: University of Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R. E. 1998. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J., and B. Crosby. 1992. Leadership for the Common Good: Tacking Public Problems in a Shared Power World. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Chrislip, D., and C. Larson. 1994. Collaborative Leadership: How Citizens and Civic Leaders Make a Difference. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Church, M., M. Bitel, K. Armstrong, P. Fernando, H. Gould, S. Joss, M. Marwaha-Diedrich, A. de la Torres, and C. Vouche. 2003. Participation, Relationships and Dynamic Change: New Thinking on Evaluating the Work of International Networks. Working Paper No.21. London: University College. .
   Google Scholar
• Cigler, B. 2001. “Multiorganizational, Multisector, and Multi-Community Organizations: Setting the Research Agenda.” In Getting Results Through Collaboration: Networks and Network Structures Public Policy Management, edited by M. Mandell, 50–71. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Connick, S. 2003. “The Use of Collaborative Processes in the Making of California Water Policy: The San Francisco Estuary Project the CALFED Bay-Delta Program, and the Sacramento Area Water Forum.” PhD diss., University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Connick, S. 2006. “The Sacramento Area Water Forum: A Case Study.” Posted at the eScholarship Repository, University of California. http://repositories.edlib.org/iurd/wps/WP-2006-06
   Google Scholar
• Cropper, S., M. Ebers, C. Huxham, and P. Ring-Smith. 2008. “Introducing Inter-organizational Relations.” In The Oxford Handbook of Inter-Organization Relations, edited by S. Cropper, M. Ebers, C. Huxham, and P. Ring-Smith, 3–21. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, S., and G. Walker. 1996. “Collaborative Learning: Improving Public Deliberation in Ecosystem-Based Management.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 16 (2): 71–102. doi:10.1016/0195-9255(96)00003-0.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. J. 1984. The Research Act: A theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R., W. Ury, and B. Patton. 1991. Getting to Yes. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gage, R., and M. P. Mandell, eds. 1990. Strategies for Managing Intergovernmental Policies and Networks. New York, NY: Praeger Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, B. 1989. Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multi-party Problems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, C., T. Lawrence, and D. Grant. 2005. “Discourse and Collaboration: The Role of Conversations and Collective Identity.” Academy of Management Review 30 (1): 58–77. doi:10.5465/AMR.2005.15281426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health and Education. n.d. “Structuring and Managing Inter-Organisational (Network) Relationships, Including Intersectoral Work, Collaborative Working Practices and Partnership.” Accessed 15 December 2015. http://www.healthknowledge.org.uk/public-health-textbook/organisation-management/5b-understanding-ofs/relationships
   Google Scholar
• Heaton, J. 1998. “Secondary Analysis of Qualitative Data.” Social Research Update 22. Department of Sociology, University of Surrey. http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/sru/SRU22.html
   Google Scholar
• Heaton, J. 2004. Reworking Qualitative Data. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Himmelman, A. 2002. “Collaboration for Change: Definitions, Decision-making Models, Roles and Collaboration Process Guide.” ( revised). Accessed 12 April 2016. https://depts.washington.edu/ccph/pdf_files/4achange.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Huxham, C., and S. Vangen. 2005. Managing to Collaborate. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., and D. E. Booher. 2010. Planning With Complexity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., S. Connick, L. Kaplan, and D. E. Booher. 2006. Collaborative Governance in the CALFED Program: Adaptive Policy Making for California Water. Berkeley: Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Isett, K. R., I. A. Mergel, K. LeRoux, P. A. Mischen, and R. K. Rethemeyer. 2011. “Networks in Public Administration Scholarship: Understanding Where we are and Where we Need to Go.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21 (Supplement 1): 167–173. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keast, R. 2004. “Integrated Public Services: The Role of Networked Arrangements.” PhD diss., Queensland University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Keast, R., K. Brown, and M. Mandell. 2007. “Getting the Right Mix: Unpacking Integration, Meanings and Strategies.” International Public Management Journal 10 (1): 9–33. doi:10.1080/10967490601185716.
   Google Scholar
• Keast, R., and M. Mandell. 2014. “A Composite Theory of Leadership and Management: Process Catalyst and Strategic Leveraging – Theory of Deliberative Action in Collaborative Networks.” In Network Theory in the Public Sector, edited by R. Keast, M. Mandell, and R. Agranoff, 33–50. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keast, R., M. P. Mandell, K. Brown, and G. W. Woolcock. 2004. “Network Structures: Working Differently and Changing Expectations.” Public Administration Review 64 (3): 363–371. doi:10.1111/puar.2004.64.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, R., and G. Lockwood. 2010. Superconnect: The Power of Networks and the Strength of Weak Links. London: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Lauring, J. 2008. “Rethinking Social Identity Theory in International Encounters: Language Use as a Negotiated Object for Identity Making.” International Journal of Cross Cultural Management 8 (3): 343–361. doi:10.1177/1470595808096673.
   Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R., D. Saunders, and B. Barry. 2006. Negotiation. 6th ed. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill International Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Mandell, M. P. 1994. “Managing Interdependencies Through Program Structures: A Revised Paradigm.” The American Review of Public Administration 24 (1): 99–121. doi:10.1177/027507409402400106.
   Google Scholar
• Mandell, M. 1999. “Community Collaborations:. Working Through Network Structures.” Review of Policy Research 16 (1): 42–64. doi:10.1111/ropr.1999.16.issue-1.
   Google Scholar
• Mandell, M. P., and R. L. Keast. 2008. “Voluntary and Community Sector Partnerships: Current Inter-Organizational Relations and Future Challenges.” In The Oxford Handbook of Inter-Organizational Relations, edited by S. Cropper, M. Ebers, C. Huxham, and P. S. Ring, 175–202. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780199282944
   Google Scholar
• Mandell, M. P., and R. Keast. 2009. “A New Look at Leadership in Collaborative Networks: Process Catalysts.” In Public Sector Leadership: International Challenges and Perspectives, edited by J. A. Raffel, P. Leisink, and A. E. Middlebrooks, 163–178. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, M., and R. Agranoff. 2011. “The Limitations of Public Management Networks.” Public Administration 89 (2): 265–284. doi:10.1111/padm.2011.89.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muirhead, B., and G. Woolcock. 2008. “Doing What We Know We Should: Engaged Scholarship and Community Development.” International Journal of Community Research and Engagement 1: 8–30.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, S. n.d. “The Function of Language to Facilitate and Maintain Social Networks in Research Weblogs, D –Essay.” Umea Universitet. Accessed 21 June 2015. http://www.eng.umu.se/stephanie/web/LanguageBlogs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• O’Flynn, J. 2009. “The Cult of Collaboration in Public Policy.” The Australian Journal of Public Administration 68 (1): 112–116. doi:10.1111/ajpa.2009.68.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Leary, R., and L. B. Bingham. 2009. The Collaborative Public Manager. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ochs, E. 1993. “Constructing Social Identity: A Language Socialization Perspective.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 26 (3): 287–306. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi2603_3.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, A., and M. Ebers. 1998. “Networking Network Studies: An Analysis of Conceptual Configurations in the Study of Inter-organizational Relationships.” Organization Studies 19 (4): 549–583. doi:10.1177/017084069801900402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, N., and C. Oswick. 2012. “Organizational Discourse: Domains, Debates and Directions.” The Academy of Management Annals 6 (1): 435–481. doi:10.1080/19416520.2012.681558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., and R. H. Lemaire. 2012. “Core Concepts and Key Ideas for Understanding Public Sector Organizational Networks: Using Research to Inform Scholarship and Practice.” Public Administration Review 72 (5): 638–648. doi:10.1111/puar.2012.72.issue-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., and H. B. Milward. 1995. “A Preliminary Theory of Interorganizational Network Effectiveness: A Comparative Study of Four Community Mental Health Systems.” Administrative Science Quarterly 40 (1): 1–33. doi:10.2307/2393698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., and H. B. Milward. 2001. “Do Networks Really Work? A Framework for Evaluating Public Sector Organizational Networks.” Public Administration Review 61 (4): 414–423. doi:10.1111/puar.2001.61.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ran, B., and P. R. Duimering. 2007. “Imaging the Organization: Language Use in Organizational Identity Claims.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication 21 (2): 155–187. doi:10.1177/1050651906297167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacramento Area Water Forum. 1996. Progress Toward a Regional Water Agreement. Sacramento, CA: City-County Office of Metropolitan Water Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Stets, J., and P. Burke. 2000. “Identity Theory and Social Identity Theory.” Social Psychology Quarterly 63 (3): 224–237. doi:10.2307/2695870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannen, D. 1990. You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York, NY: Ballentine Books.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. 2000. “So Now they are Going to Measure Empowerment.” Paper for INTRAC 4th International Workshop on the Evaluation of Social Development, Oxford, April.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, A. M., and J. L. Perry. 2006. “Collaboration Processes: Inside the Black Box.” Public Administration Review 66 (1): 20–32.
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, H. 2001. “Taking the Stress out of Stressful Conversations.” Harvard Business Review July–August: 112–119.
   Google Scholar
• White, P. 2010. “Making Use of Secondary Data.” In Key Methods in Geography, edited by N. Clifford, S. French, and G. Valentine, 61–76. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Woolcock, G., and C. Boorman. 2003. Doing What we Know we Should: Final Report: Service Integration Report (Goodna). The Community Service Research Centre and University of Queensland. http://www.uq.edu.au/boilerhouse/docs/Woolcock-&-Boorman-SIP-Final-Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• 6, P., N. Goodwin, E. Peck, and T. Freeman. 2006. Managing Networks of Twenty First Century Organisations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar