4,411
Views
103
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Open innovation in the public sector: drivers and barriers for the adoption of Challenge.gov

ORCID Icon

References

  • Arundel, A., L. Casali, and H. Hollanders. 2015. “How European Public Sector Agencies Innovate: The Use of Bottom-Up, Policy-Dependent and Knowledge-Scanning Innovation Methods.” Research Policy 44 (7): 1271–1282. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.04.007.
  • Belderbosa, R., B. Cassimana, D. Faemsa, B. Letena, and B. Van Looy 2014. “Co-Ownership of Intellectual Property: Exploring the Value-Appropriation and Value-Creation Implications of Co-Patenting with Different Partners.” Research Policy 43 (5): 841–852. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.013.
  • Benkler, Y. 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Boivard, T. 2007. “Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services.” Public Administration Review 67 (5): 846–860. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x.
  • Burgelman, R. A. 1983. “A Model of the Interaction of Strategic Behavior, Corporate Context, and the Concept of Strategy.” Academy of Management Journal 8 (1): 61–70.
  • Chesbrough, H. 2003. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
  • Chesbrough, H., and A. K. Crowther. 2006. “Beyond High Tech: Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other Industries.” R&D Management 36 (3): 229–236. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00428.x.
  • Coglianese, C. 2004. “E-Rulemaking: Information Technology and the Regulatory Process.” Administrative Law Review 56 (2): 353–402.
  • Colatat, P. 2015. “An Organizational Perspective to Funding Science: Collaborator Novelty at DARPA.” Research Policy 44 (4): 874–887. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.005.
  • Congress, 110th. 2007. “America COMPETES Act.” In H.R.2272, edited by 110th Congress. Washington, DC: Library of Congress.
  • Dahlandera, L., and H. Piezunkab. 2014. “Open to Suggestions: How Organizations Elicit Suggestions through Proactive and Reactive Attention.” Research Policy 43 (5): 812–827. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.006.
  • de Sousa Santos, B. 1998. “Participatory Budgeting in Porto Alegre: Toward a Redistributive Democracy.” Politics & Society 26 (4): 461–510. doi:10.1177/0032329298026004003.
  • DeHart-Davis, L., J. Chen, and T. D. Little. 2013. “Written versus Unwritten Rules: The Role of Rule Formalization in Green Tape.” International Public Management Journal 16 (3): 331–356. doi:10.1080/10967494.2013.825193.
  • Denzin, N. K., and Y. S. Lincoln. 2011. “Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 1–19. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Du, J., B. Leten, and W. Vanhaverbeke. 2014. “Managing Open Innovation Projects with Science-Based and Market-Based Partners.” Research Policy 43 (5): 828–840. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.12.008.
  • E-Government Act of 2002, Public Law 107–347—DEC. 17 2002, Issuing Organization: 107th U.S. Congress, Washington, DC.
  • Ettlie, J. E., and J. M. Elsenbach. 2007. “The Changing Role of R&D Gatekeepers.” Research-Technology Management 50 (5): 59–66.
  • Felina, T., and T. R. Zenger. 2014. “Closed or Open Innovation? Problem Solving and the Governance Choice.” Reearch Policy 43 (5): 914–925. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.09.006.
  • Fu, X. 2012. “How Does Openness Affect the Importance of Incentives for Innovation?” Research Policy 41 (3): 512–523. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.011.
  • Gambardella, A., and C. Panico. 2014. “On the Management of Open Innovation.” Research Policy 43 (5): 903–913. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.12.002.
  • Howe, J. P. 2006. “The Rise of Crowdsourcing.” Wired Magazine Online 14 (6). https://www.wired.com/2006/06/crowds/
  • Jeppesen, L. B., and K. R. Lakhani. 2010. “Marginality and Problem-Solving Effectiveness in Broadcast Search.” Organization Science 21 (5): 1016–1033. doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0491.
  • Joshi, A., and M. H. Moore. 2004. “Institutionalised Co-Production: Unorthodox Public Service Delivery in Challenging Environments.” Journal of Development Studies 40 (4): 31–49. doi:10.1080/00220380410001673184.
  • Katz, R., and T. J. Allen. 1982. “Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) Syndrome: A Look at the Performance, Tenure, and Communication Patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups.” R&D Management 12 (1): 7–20. doi:10.1111/radm.1982.12.issue-1.
  • Lakhani, K. R., and L. B. Jeppesen. 2007. “Getting Unusual Suspects to Solve R&D Puzzles.” Harvard Business Review 85: 5.
  • Lee, S. M., T. Hwang, and D. Choi. 2012. “Open Innovation in the Public Sector of Leading Countries.” Management Decision 50 (1): 147–162. doi:10.1108/00251741211194921.
  • Meijer, A. 2015. “E-Governance Innovation: Barriers and Strategies.” Government Information Quarterly 32 (2): 198–206. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2015.01.001.
  • Mergel, I. 2015. “Opening government: Designing Open Innovation Processes to Collaborate with External Problem Solvers.” Social Science Computer Review 33 (5): 599-612.
  • Mergel, I., and K. Desouza. 2013. “Implementing Open Innovation in the Public Sector: The Case of Challenge.Gov.” Public Administration Review 73 (6): 882–890. doi:10.1111/puar.2013.73.issue-6.
  • Mergel, I., S. I. Bretschneider, C. Louis, and J. Smith. 2014. “The Challenges of Challenge.Gov: Adopting Private Sector Business Innovations in the Federal Government.” In Proceedings of the 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 2073–2082. Washington, DC: IEEE.
  • Miles, M. B., A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldana. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Murray, F., S. Stern, G. Campbell, and A. MacCormack. 2012. “Grand Innovation Prizes: A Theoretical, Normative, and Empirical Evaluation.” Research Policy 41 (10): 1779–1792. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.06.013.
  • NASA. n.d. “Asteroid Initiative: NASA’s Asteroid Redirect Mission and Grand Challenge.” http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/asteroids/initiative/-.U-T1bPldXTo
  • Osborne, S. P., Z. Radnor, and K. Strokosch. 2016. “Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services: A Suitable Case for Treatment?” Public Management Review 18 (5): 639–653. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1111927.
  • Piezunka, H., and L. Dahlander. 2015. “Distant Search, Narrow Attention: How Crowding Alters Organizations’ Filtering of Suggestions in Crowdsourcing.” Academy of Management Journal 58 (3): 856-880.
  • Rainey, H. G., S. Pandey, and B. Bozeman. 1995. “Research Note: Public and Private Managers’ Perceptions of Red Tape.” Public Administration Review 55 (6): 567–574. doi:10.2307/3110348.
  • Ropera, S., P. Vahterb, and J. H. Lovec. 2013. “Externalities of Openness in Innovation.” Research Policy 42: 1544–1554. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.006.
  • Salge, T. O., T. Farchi, M. I. Barrett, and S. Dopson. 2013. “When Does Search Openness Really Matter? A Contingency Study of Health-Care Innovation Projects.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 30 (4): 659–676. doi:10.1111/jpim.12015.
  • Shirky, C. 2008. Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing without Organizations. New York: Penguin.
  • Surowiecki, J. 2004. The Wisdom of Crowds. New York, NY: Knopf Doubleday.
  • The White House. 2009. The Open Government Initiative. edited by Executive Office of the President. Washington, DC: White House.
  • The White House. 2010. Guidance on the Use of Challenges and Prizes to Promote Open Government Edited by Office of Management and Budget. Washington, DC: Exectuvie Office of the President.
  • Villarroel, J. A. 2013. “Strategic Crowdsourcing: The Emergence of Online Distributed Innovation.” In Leading Open Innovation, edited by A. S. Huff, K. M. Moeslein, and R. Reichwald, 171–200. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • West, J., and K. R. Lakhani. 2008. “Getting Clear about Communities in Open Innovation.” Industry & Innovation 15: 223–231. doi:10.1080/13662710802033734.
  • West, J., and M. Bogers. 2014. “Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 31 (4): 814–831. doi:10.1111/jpim.2014.31.issue-4.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.