Preparing public managers for the digital era: incorporating information management, use, and technology into public affairs graduate curricula

References

• Andersen, D. F., and S. Dawes. 1991. Government Information Management. A Primer and Casebook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, J. N., R. Gauld, and S. Goldfinch. 2012. “What Public Servants Really Think of E-Government?” Public Management Review 14 (1): 105–127. doi:10.1080/14719037.2011.589616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardach, E., and E. M. Patashnik. 2015. Practical Guide for Policy Analysis: The Eightfold Path to More Effective Problem Solving. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, K., and R. Green. 2015. “Bad Data: A Special Report (The Causes, Costs and Consequences of Bad Government Data).” Governing (July Issue) 24–31. http://www.governing.com/topics/mgmt/gov-bad-data.html
   Google Scholar
• Baum, C. H., and A. Di Maio. 2000.”Gartner’s Four Phases of E-government Model.” Accessed March 25 2015. http://www.gartner.com
   Google Scholar
• Bretschneider, S. I., and I. Mergel. 2012. “Technology and Public Management Information Systems: Where We Have Been and Where We are Going.” In The State of Public Administration: Issues, Challenges, and Opportunities, edited by D. C. Menzel and H. L. White, 187–203. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. M., and J. L. Brudney. 1998. “Public Sector Information Technology Initiatives: Implications for Programs of Public Administration.” Administration & Society 30 (4): 421–442. doi:10.1177/0095399798304005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-C., and J. Gant. 2002. “Transforming Local E-Government Services: The Use of Application Service Providers.” Government Information Quarterly 18 (4): 343–355. doi:10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00090-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coursey, D., and D. F. Norris. 2008. “Models of E-Government: Are They Correct? an Empirical Assessment.” Public Administration Review 68 (3): 523–536. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00888.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes, S. S. 2004. “Training the IT-Savvy Public Manager: Priorities and Strategies for Public Management Education.” Journal of Public Affairs Education 10 (1): 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Dawes, S. S. 2008. “The Evolution and Continuing Challenges of E-Governance.” Public Administration Review 68 (special issue): S86–S102. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00981.x.
   Google Scholar
• Dawes, S. S. 2009. “Governance In a Digital Age: A Research And Action Framework For An Uncertain Future.” Government Information Quarterly 26 (2): 257-264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes, S. S., A. M. Cresswell, and T. A. Pardo. 2009. “From “Need to Know” to “Need to Share”: Tangled Problems, Information Boundaries, and the Building of Public Sector Knowledge Networks.” Public Administration Review 69 (3): 392–402. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.01987_2.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desouza, K. C., and B. Jacob 2014. “Big Data in the Public Sector: Lessons for Practitioners and Scholars.” Administration & Society. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0095399714555751.
   Google Scholar
• Feeney, M. K., and E. W. Welch. 2012. “Electronic Participation Technologies and Perceived Outcomes for Local Government Managers.” Public Management Review 14 (6): 815–833. doi:10.1080/14719037.2011.642628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fountain, J. 2001. Building The Virtual State: Information Technology And Institutional Change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ganapati, S., and C. G. Reddick. 2012. “Open E-Government in U.S. State Governments: Survey Evidence from Chief Information Officers.” Government Information Quarterly 29 (2): 115–122. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garson, G. D. 2006. Public Information Technology and E-Governance: Managing the Virtual State. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gil-Garcia, J. R. 2012. Enacting Electronic Government Success: An Integrative Study of Government-Wide Websites, Organizational Capabilities, and Institutions. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gil-Garcia, J. R., S. A. Chun, and M. Janssen. 2009. “Government Information Sharing and Integration: Combining the Social and the Technical.” Information Polity 14 (1 and 2): 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Gil-Garcia, J. R., and T. A. Pardo. 2005. “E-Government Success Factors: Mapping Practical Tools to Theoretical Foundations.” Government Information Quarterly 22 (2): 187–216. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2005.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guha, J., and B. Chakrabarti. 2014. “Making E-Government Work: Adopting the Network Approach.” Government Information Quarterly 31 (2): 327–336. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Q., and T. A. Bryer. 2014. “Exploring the Potential of Social Networking Sites for Public Service Professionals.” International Journal of Organizational Theory and Behavior 17 (4): 401–427.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, E. 2015. Governance in the Information Era: Theory and Practice of Policy Informatics. New York, NY: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., and K. Layne. 2001. “Making the Connection: E-Government and Public Administration Education.” Journal of Public Affairs Education 7 (4): 229–240.
   Google Scholar
• Lan, Z., and J. Cayer. 1994. “The Challenges of Teaching Information Technology Use and Management in a Time of Information Revolution.” The American Review of Public Administration 24 (2): 207–222. doi:10.1177/027507409402400206.
   Google Scholar
• Layne, K., and J. Lee. 2001. “Developing Fully Functional E-Government: A Four Stage Model.” Government Information Quarterly 18 (2): 122–136. doi:10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lips, M. B., and T. Schuppan. 2009. “Transforming E-Government Knowledge through Public Management Research.” Public Management Review 11 (6): 739–749. doi:10.1080/14719030903318921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer-Schönberger, V., and D. Lazer, ed. 2007. Governance and Information Technology: From Electronic Government to Information Government. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• McClure, D. L. 1997. “Improving Federal Performance in the Information Era: The Information Technology Management Reform Act of 1996.” Government Information Quarterly 14 (3): 255–269. doi:10.1016/S0740-624X(97)90004-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. 2007. “Editorial: Why Don’t They Listen to Us? Reasserting the Role of ICT in Public Administration.” Information Polity 12 (4): 233–242.
   Google Scholar
• Mergel, I. 2012. “The Public Manager 2.0: Preparing the Social Media Generation for a Networked Workplace.” Journal of Public Affairs Education 18 (3): 467–492.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, M. J., J. Lee, and C.-Y. Roh. 2014. “The Evolution of Internal IT Applications and E-Government Studies in Public Administration: Research Themes and Methods.” Administration & Society 46 (1): 3–36. doi:10.1177/0095399712459723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation. 1999. “Digital Government Program Announcement NSF 99-103.” Accessed March 15 2015. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/1999/nsf99103/nsf99103.txt
   Google Scholar
• Norris, D. F., and B. A. Lloyd. 2006. “The Scholarly Literature on E-Government: Characterizing a Nascent Field.” International Journal of Electronic Government Research 2 (4): 40–96. doi:10.4018/jegr.2006100103.
   Google Scholar
• Pardo, T. A., J. R. Gil-Garcia, and S. S. Dawes. 2015. “Call for Papers: Special Issue Topic: Digital Government and Public Management.” Accessed March 15 2015. https://dgsociety.org/call-papers-special-issue-public-management-review
   Google Scholar
• Public Affairs Ranked. Accessed May 25 2015. http://grad-schools.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-public-affairs-schools/public-affairs-rankings
   Google Scholar
• Reddick, C. G. 2012. Public Administration And Information Technology. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Savoldelli, A., C. Codagnone, and G. Misuraca. 2014. “Understanding the E-Government Paradox: Learning from Literature and Practice on Barriers to Adoption.” Government Information Quarterly 31 (Supplement 1): s63–s71. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., and J. M. Corbin. 2007. Basics of Quantitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tolbert, C. J., K. Mossberger, and R. McNeal. 2008. “Institutions, Policy Innovation and E-Government in the American States.” Public Administration Review 68 (3): 549–563. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00890.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wescott, C. 2001. “E-Government in the Asia-Pacific Region.” Asian Journal of Political Science 9 (2): 1–24. doi:10.1080/02185370108434189.
   Google Scholar
• White, J. D. 2007. Managing Information in the Public Sector. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Yildiz, M. 2007. “E-Government Research: Reviewing the Literature, Limitations, and Ways Forward.” Government Information Quarterly 24 (3): 646–665. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2007.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildiz, M. 2012. “Big Questions of E-Government Research.” Information Polity 17 (3–4): 343–355.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, F. 2013. “An Empirical Study of Cultural Dimensions and E-Government Development: Implications of the Findings and Strategies.” Behavior & Information Technology 32 (3): 294–306. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2011.644580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar