2,514
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Citizens’ e-participation on agenda setting in local governance: Do individual social capital and e-participation management matter?

&

References

  • Andrain, C., and J. Smith. 2006. Political Democracy, Trust, and Social Justice. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
  • Andrews, R., and G. Brewer. 2013. “Social Capital, Management Capacity and Public Service Performance.” Public Management Review 15 (1): 19–42. doi:10.1080/14719037.2012.662445.
  • Baird, V. A. 2000. “Building Institutional Legitimacy: The Role of Procedural Justice.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (2): 333–354.
  • Bartels, K. 2014. “Communicative Capacity: The Added Value of Public Encounters for Participatory Democracy.” American Review of Public Administration 44 (6): 656~674. doi:10.1177/0275074013478152.
  • Belanger, F., and L. Carter. 2008. “Trust and Risk in E-Government Adoption.” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 17 (2): 165−176. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2007.12.002.
  • Berman, E. M. 1997. “Dealing with Cynical Citizens.” Public Administration Review 57 (1): 105–112. doi:10.2307/977058.
  • Best, S., and B. Krueger. 2005. “Analyzing the Representativeness of Internet Political Participation.” Political Behavior 27: 183–216. doi:10.1007/s11109-005-3242-y.
  • Billig, S. H. 2002. “Support for K-12 Service-Learning Practice: A Brief Review of the Research.” Educational Horizons 80 (4): 184–189.
  • Boix, C., and D. Posner. 1998. “Social Capital: Explaining Its Origins and Effects on Government Performance.” British Journal of Political Science 28 (4): 686–693. doi:10.1017/S0007123498000313.
  • Bovens, M., and S. Zouridis. 2002. “From Street-Level to System-Level Bureaucracies: How Information and Communication Technology Is Transforming Administrative Discretion and Constitutional Control.” Public Administration Review 62 (2): 174–184. doi:10.1111/puar.2002.62.issue-2.
  • Bradbury, M., and M. Williams. 2013. “Diversity and Citizen Participation: The Effect of Race on Juror Decision Making.” Administration & Society 45 (5): 563–582. doi:10.1177/0095399712459729.
  • Brehm, J., and W. Rahn. 1997. “Individual-Level Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of Social Capital.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (3): 999–1023. doi:10.2307/2111684.
  • Brewer, G. A. 2003. “Building Social Capital: Civic Attitudes and Behavior of Public Servants.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13 (1): 5–26. doi:10.1093/jopart/mug011.
  • Burt, R. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
  • Cleary, M. R., and S. C. Stokes. 2006. Democracy and the Culture of Skepticism: Political Trust in Argentina and Mexico. New York: Russell Sage Foundation Publications.
  • Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Coursey, D., and D. Norris. 2008. “Models of E-Government: Are They Correct? An Empirical Assessment.” Public Administration Review 68 (3): 523–536. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00888.x.
  • Davis, F. D. 1989. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology.” MIS Quarterly 13 (3): 319–339. doi:10.2307/249008.
  • Edelmann, N., and P. Cruickshank. 2012. “Introducing Psychological Factors into E-Participation Research.” In E-Governance and Civic Engagement: Factors and Determinants of E-Democracy, edited by A. Manoharan and M. Holzer, 338–361. Hershey, PA: IGI.
  • Feeney, M., and A. Brown. 2017. “Are Small Cities Online? Content, Ranking, and Variation of U.S. Municipal Websites.” Government Information Quarterly 34 (1): 62–74. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2016.10.005.
  • Feeney, M., and E. Welch. 2016. “Technology-Task Coupling: Exploring Social Media Use and Managerial Perceptions of E-Government.” American Review of Public Administration 46 (2): 162–179. doi:10.1177/0275074014547413.
  • Ganapati, N. E. 2012. “Downsides of Social Capital for Women during Disaster Recovery: Toward a More Critical Approach.” Administration & Society 45 (1): 72–96. doi:10.1177/0095399712471491.
  • Gil de Zuniga, H., N. Jung, and S. Valenzuela. 2012. “Social Media Use for News and Individuals’ Social Capital, Civic Engagement and Political Participation.” Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication 17: 319–336. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x.
  • Gramberger, M. 2001. Citizens as Partners: Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy- Making. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  • Granovetter, M. S. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78 (1): 1360–1380. doi:10.1086/225469.
  • Halvorsen, K. E. 2003. “Assessing the Effects of Public Participation.” Public Administration Review 63 (5): 535–543. doi:10.1111/puar.2003.63.issue-5.
  • Herian, M. N., J. A. Hamm, A. J. Tomkins, and L. P. Zillig. 2012. “Public Participation, Procedural Fairness, and Evaluations of Local Governance: The Moderating Role of Uncertainty.” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 22 (4): 815–840. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur064.
  • Hiller, J., and F. Belanger. 2001. Privacy Strategies for Electronic Government. Washington DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
  • Inoguchi, T., M. Basanez, A. Tanaka, and T. Dadabaev. 2005. Values and Life Styles in Urban Asia: A Cross-Cultural Analysis and Sourcebook Based on the Asia Barometer Survey of 2003. Mexico City: Siglo XXI Editores.
  • Kim, C., and M. Holzer. 2008. “The Utilization of Online Policy Forums on Government Web Sites and the Practice of Digital Democracy.” In E-Government Research: Policy and Management, edited by D. Norris, 268–295. Hershey, PA: IGI.
  • Kim, S. 2005. “The Role of Trust in the Modern Administrative State: An Integrative Model.” Administration and Society 37 (5): 611–635. doi:10.1177/0095399705278596.
  • Kim, S. H. 2010. “Public Trust in Government in Japan and South Korea: Does the Rise of Critical Citizens Matter?” Public Administration Review 70 (5): 801–810. doi:10.1111/puar.2010.70.issue-5.
  • King, C. S., and C. Stivers. 1998. Government Is US: Public Administration in an Anti- Government Era. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • King, C. S., K. Feltey, and B. Susel. 1998. “The Question of Participation: Toward Authentic Public Participation in Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 58 (4): 317-326. doi:10.2307/977561.
  • Kingdon, J. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York, NY: HarperCollins College Publishers.
  • Knack, S. 1992. “Civic Norms, Social Sanctions and Voting Turnout.” Rationality and Society 4 (2): 133–156. doi:10.1177/1043463192004002002.
  • Knack, S. 2002. “Social Capital and the Quality of Government: Evidence from the States.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (4): 772–785. doi:10.2307/3088433.
  • Knoke, D. 1990. “Networks of Political Action: Toward Theory Construction.” Social Forces 68 (4): 1041–1065. doi:10.2307/2579133.
  • Krackhardt, D. 1992. “The Strength of Strong Ties: The Importance of Philos in Organizations.” In Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action, edited by N. Nohria and R. Eccles, 216–239. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Kraut, R. E., M. Patterson, V. Lundmark, S. Kiesler, T. Mukopadhyay, and W. Scherlis. 1998. “Internet Paradox: A Social Technology that Reduces Social Involvement and Psychological Well-Being?” American Psychologist 53: 1017–1031. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017.
  • Krueger, B. 2002. “Assessing the Potential of Internet Political Participation in the United States: A Resource Approach.” American Politics Research 30: 476–498. doi:10.1177/1532673X02030005002.
  • Krueger, B. 2006. “A Comparison of Conventional and Internet Political Mobilization.” American Politics Research 34: 759–776. doi:10.1177/1532673X06290911.
  • Kweit, M. G., and R. W. Kweit. 2004. “Citizen Participation and Citizen Evaluation in Disaster Recovery.” American Review of Public Administration 34 (4): 354–373. doi:10.1177/0275074004268573.
  • Larsen, E., and L. Rainie. 2002. “The Rise of the E-Citizen: How People Use Government Agencies’ Websites.” Pew Internet & American Life Project.
  • Lee, J. 2017. “An Exploratory Study of E-Participation Technology Adoption by Citizens.” In Routledge Handbook on Information Technology in Government, edited by Y.-C. Chen and M. Ahn, 284–300. New York: Routledge.
  • Long, J. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Macintosh, A., and A. Whyte. 2008. “Towards an Evaluation Framework for Eparticipation.” Transforming Government: People, Process & Policy 2 (1): 16–30. doi:10.1108/17506160810862928.
  • Marien, S., M. Hooghe, and E. Quintelier. 2010. “Inequalities in Non-Institutionalised Forms of Political Participation: A Multi-Level Analysis of 25 Countries.” Political Studies 58: 187–213. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00801.x.
  • Medaglia, R. 2012. “Eparticipation Research: Moving Characterization Forward (2006-2011).” Government Information Quarterly 29 (3): 346–360. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.02.010.
  • Moon, J., and L. S. Sproull. 2008. “The Role of Feedback in Managing the Internet-Based Volunteer Work Force.” Information Systems Research 19 (4): 494–515. doi:10.1287/isre.1080.0208.
  • Moon, M. 1999. “The Pursuit of Managerial Entrepreneurship: Does Organization Matter?” Public Administration Review 59 (1): 31–43. doi:10.2307/977477.
  • Moon, M. 2002. “The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality?” Public Administrative Review 62 (4): 424–433. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00196.
  • Morgeson, III, V., D. Amburg, and S. Mithas. 2011. “Misplaced Trust? Exploring the structural of the E-government-citizen Trust Relationship.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21 (2): 257-283. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq006.
  • Mossberger, K., C. Tolbert, and R. McNeal. 2008. Digital Citizenship: The Internet, Society and Participation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Mossberger, K., Y. Wu, and J. Crawford. 2013. “Connecting Citizens and Local Governments? Social Media and Interactivity in Major U.S. Cities.” Government Information Quarterly 30: 351–358. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.016.
  • Moynihan, D. 1970. Maximum Feasible Misunderstanding. New York: Free Press.
  • Moynihan, D. P. 2003. “Normative and Instrumental Perspectives on Public Participation.” American Review of Public Administration 33 (2): 164–168. doi:10.1177/0275074003251379.
  • Nabatchi, T. 2012. “Putting the “Public” Back in Public Values Research: Designing Participation to Identify and Respond to Values.” Public Administration Review 72 (5): 699–708. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02544.x.
  • Norris, P. 2000. A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • O’Brien, R. M. 2007. “A Caution regarding Rule of Thumb for Variance Inflation Factors.” Quality and Quantity 41 (5): 673–690. doi:10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6.
  • O’Leary, R., D. Van Slyke, and S. Kim. 2010. The Future of Public Administration around the World: The Minnowbrook Perspective. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Oser, J., M. Hooghe, and S. Marien. 2013. “Is Online Participation Distinct from Offline Participation? A Latent Class Analysis of Participation Types and Their Stratification.” Political Research Quarterly 66 (1): 91–101. doi:10.1177/1065912912436695.
  • Parasuraman, A., V. Zeithaml, and A. Malhotra. 2005. “E-S-Qual: A Multiple-Item Scale for Assessing Electronic Service Quality.” Journal of Service Research 7 (3): 213–233. doi:10.1177/1094670504271156.
  • Pautz, M. C., and M. H. Schnitzer. 2008. “Policymaking from Below: The Role of Environmental Inspectors and Publics.” Administrative Theory & Praxis 30 (4): 450–475.
  • Phillips, M. 1982. “Motivation and Expectation in Successful Volunteerism.” Journal of Voluntary Action Research 11 (1/2): 118–125.
  • Preece, J., and B. Shneiderman. 2009. “The Reader-To-Leader Framework: Motivating Technology- Mediated Social Participation.” Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction 1 (1): 13–32.
  • Putnam, R. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Putnam, R., R. Leonardi, and R. Y. Nanetti. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Pytlikzillig, L., A. Tomkins, M. Herian, and R. Hoppe. 2012. “Trust in Government: Findings from Public Budgeting Consultations.” Working Paper. Accessed June 13, 2017. http://www.ca-ilg.org/sites/main/files/file-attachments/trust_in_govt_findings_publicbudgetingconsultations_0.pdf
  • Rehberg, W. 2005. “Altruistic Individualists: Motivations for International Volunteering among Young Adults in Switzerland.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 16 (2): 109–122. doi:10.1007/s11266-005-5693-5.
  • Robbins, M., B. Simonsen, and B. Feldman. 2008. “Citizens and Resource Allocation: Improving Decision Making with Interactive Web-Based Citizen Participation.” Public Administration Review 68 (3): 564–575. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00891.x.
  • Roberts, N. 2004. “Public Deliberation in an Age of Direct Citizen Participation.” American Review of Public Administration 34 (4): 315–353. doi:10.1177/0275074004269288.
  • Rottman, D. B. 1998. “On Public Trust and Confidence: Does Experience with the Courts Promote or Diminish It?” Court Review 35: 14–22.
  • Seoul Metropolitan Government. 2014. “The Status of Chen-Man-Sang-Sang-Oasis.” Internal Document.
  • Smith, A. 2010. “Government Online: The Internet Gives New Paths to Government Services and Information.” Pew Internet & American Life Project.
  • Stivers, C. 1994. “The Listening Bureaucrat: Responsiveness in Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 54 (4): 364–369. doi:10.2307/977384.
  • Stolle, D. 1998. “Bowling Together, Bowling Alone: The Development of Generalized Trust in Voluntary Associations.” Political Psychology 19 (3): 49–73.
  • Tajfel, H., and J. Turner. 1986. “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behaviors.” In Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by S. Worchel and W. G. Austion, 7–24. Chicago: Nelson- Hall Publishers.
  • Thomas, C., and G. Streib. 2003. “The New Face of Government: Citizen-Initiated Contacts in the Era of E-Government.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13 (1): 83–102. doi:10.1093/jpart/mug010.
  • Thomas, C., and J. Melkers. 1999. “Explaining Citizen-Initiated Contacts with Municipal Bureaucrats: Lessons from the Atlantic Experience.” Urban Affairs Review 34 (5): 667–690. doi:10.1177/10780879922184130.
  • Van Ryzin, G. 2011. “Outcomes, Process, and Trust of Civil Servants.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21 (4): 745–760. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq092.
  • Venkatesh, V., M. Morris, G. Davis, and F. D. Davis. 2003. ““User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View.” MIS Quarterly 27 (3): 425–478.
  • Verba, S., K. L. Schlozmanm, and H. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Wang, X., and M. Van Wart. 2007. “When Public Participation in Administration Leads to Trust: An Empirical Assessment of Managers’ Perceptions.”.” Public Administration Review 67 (2): 265–278. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00712.x.
  • Wang, X., and T. A. Bryer. 2013. “Assessing the Costs of Public Participation: A Case Study of Two Online Participation Mechanisms.” The American Review of Public Administration 43 (2): 179–199. doi:10.1177/0275074012438727.
  • Webler, T., and S. Tuler. 2000. “Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Theoretical Reflections from a Case Study.” Administration and Society 32 (5): 566–595. doi:10.1177/00953990022019588.
  • Welch, E., C. Hinnant, and M. Moon. 2005. “Linking Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government and Trust in Government.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15 (3): 371–391. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui021.
  • Welch, E. 2012. “The Rise of Participatory Technologies in Government.” In Transformational Government through Egov Practices: Socioeconomic, Cultural, and Technological Issues, edited by M. Shareef, N. Archer, Y. Dwivedi, A. Mishar, and S. Pandey, 347–367. Bingley: Emerald Publishers.
  • West, D. 2004. “E-Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes.” Public Administration Review 64 (1): 15–27. doi:10.1111/puar.2004.64.issue-1.
  • White, J. 2007. Managing Information in the Public Sector. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
  • Wilson, J. 2000. “Volunteering.” The Annual Review of Sociology 26 (1): 215–240. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.215.
  • Yang, K., and M. Holzer. 2006. “The Performance-Trust Link: Implications for Performance Measurement.” Public Administration Review 66 (1): 114–126. doi:10.1111/puar.2006.66.issue-1.
  • Yeung, A. 2004. “The Octagon Model of Volunteer Motivation: Results of a Phenomenological Analysis.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 15 (1): 21–46. doi:10.1023/B:VOLU.0000023632.89728.ff.
  • Zheng, Y. 2017. “Explaining Citizens’ E-Participation Usage: Functionality of E-Participation Applications.” Administration & Society 49 (3): 423–442. doi:10.1177/0095399715593313.
  • Zheng, Y., H. L. Schachter, and M. Holzer. 2014. “The Impact of Government Form on E-Participation: A Study of New Jersey Municipalities.” Government Information Quarterly 31: 653–659. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2014.06.004.
  • Zukerman, A., and D. West. 1985. “The Political Bases of Citizen Contacting: A Cross-National Analysis.” American Political Science Review 79 (1): 117–131. doi:10.2307/1956122.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.