Trapped in the hierarchy: the craft of Dutch city managers

References

• Agar, M. 1996 [1980]. Professional Stranger. 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agranoff, R. 2006. “Inside Collaborative Networks: Ten Lessons for Public Managers.” Public Administration Review 66 (6, supplement 1): 56–65.
   Google Scholar
• Allan, P. 1981. “Managers at Work: A Large-Scale Study of the Managerial Job in New York City Government.” Academy of Management Journal 24 (3): 613–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andeweg, R., and I. Galen. 2002. Governance and Politics of the Netherlands. New York: Palgrave-MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., and A. Gash. 2008. “Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4): 543–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartelings, J., J. Goedee, J. Raab, and R. Bijl. 2017. “The Nature of Orchestrational Work.” Public Management Review 19 (3): 342–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, S. 1951. Executive Behavior: A Study of the Work Load and the Working Methods of Managing Directors. Stromberg: Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Cloutier, C., J. Denis, A. Langley, and L. Lamothe. 2016. “Agency at the Managerial Interface: Public Sector Reform as Institutional Work.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26 (2): 259–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. 2014. Social Science Research. From Field to Desk. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Dargie, C. 1998. “The Role of Public Sector Chief Executives.” Public Administration 76 (1): 161–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, P. 2001. “Spies as Informants: Triangulation and the Interpretation of Elite Interview Data in the Study of the Intelligence and Security Services.” Politics 21 (1): 73–80.
   Google Scholar
• Demir, T., and C. Reddick. 2012. “Understanding Shared Roles in Policy and Administration: An Empirical Study of Council-Manager Relations.” Public Administration Review 72 (4): 526–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, R., R. Fretz, and L. Shaw. 2011. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, J. 2008. “Managing the Diary: What Does a Police Commissioner Do?” Public Administration 86 (3): 679–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederickson, H., and D. Matkin. 2007. “Public Leadership as Gardening.” In Transforming Public Leadership for the 21st Century, edited by R. Morse, T. Buss, and C. Kinghorn. London: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Gains, F. 2015. “Observational Analysis.” In Oxford Handbook of Political Leadership, edited by R. A. W. Rhodes and P. Hart. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guarneros-Meza, V., and S. Martin. 2016. “Boundary Spanning in Local Public Service Partnerships.” Public Management Review 18 (2): 238–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, P. 2014. Understanding Public Leadership. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, P., and A. Wille. 2006. “Ministers and Top Officials in the Dutch Core Executive: Living Together, Growing Apart?” Public Administration 84 (1): 121–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, J., J. Alford, O. Hughes, and S. Yates. 2015. “Public Value and Political Astuteness in the Work of Public Managers: The Art of the Possible.” Public Administration 93 (1): 195–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C., and M. Lodge. 2006. The Politics of Public Service Bargains. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huby, G., J. Harries, and S. Grant. 2011. “Contributions of Ethnography to the Study of Public Services Management.” Public Management Review 13 (2): 209–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, H. 1981. Administrative Behavior of Federal Bureau Chiefs. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Knights, D., and H. Willmott, eds. 1986. Managing the Labour Process. Aldershot: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Korica, M., D. Nicolini, and B. Johnson. 2015. “In Search of ‘Managerial Work’: Past, Present and Future of an Analytic Category.” International Journal of Management Reviews 19 (2): 151–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassman, P., and R. Speirs. [original 1918] 1994. Weber: Political Writings. Cambridge texts in the history of political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lilleker, D. 2003. “Interviewing the Political Elite: Navigating a Potential Minefield.” Politics 23 (3): 207–214.
   Google Scholar
• Littig, B. 2009. “Interviewing the Elite - Interviewing Experts: Is There a Difference?” In Interviewing Experts, edited by A. Bogner, B. Littig, and M. Wolfgang. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, L. 1996. Public Management as Art, Science, and Profession. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• March, J., and J. Olsen. 1979. Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. 2nd ed. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Martinko, M., and W. Gardner. 1985. “Beyond Structured Observations: Methodological Issues and New Directions.” Academy of Management Review 10 (4): 676–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. 1971. “Managerial Work: Analysis from Observation.” Management Science 18 (2): 97–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. 1973. The Nature of Managerial Work. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. 1990. “The Manager’s Job: Folklore and Fact.” Harvard Business Review, 68 (2): 163–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwenkamp, R. 2001. De Prijs Van Het Politieke Primaat. Delft: Eburon [Dutch].
   Google Scholar
• Noordegraaf, M. 2000. Attention! Work and Behavior of Public Managers Amidst Ambiguity. Delft: Eburon.
   Google Scholar
• Oakeshott, M. 1996. The Politics of Faith and the Politics of Skepticism. Ed. T. Fuller. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, J. 2006. “Maybe It Is Time to Rediscover Bureaucracy.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16 (1): 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. 2001. The Politics of Bureaucracy. 5th ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., and G. Bouckaert. 2011. Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis: New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Provan, K., and P. Kenis. 2008. “Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (2): 229–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raadschelders, J. 2004. “A Model of the Arena of PA-theory: Bogey Man, Doctor’s Bag And/Or Artist’s Medium.” Administrative Theory & Praxis 26 (1): 46–78.
   Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. 2014. Understanding and Managing Public Organizations. 5th ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. 2016. “Recovering the Craft of Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 76 (4): 638–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R., P. 't Hart, and M. Noordegraaf. 2007. Observing Government Elites: Up Close and Personal. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. 2011. Everyday Life in British Government. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sancino, A., and A. Turrini. 2009. “The Managerial Work of Italian City Managers: An Empirical Analysis.” Local Government Studies 35 (4): 475–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schillemans, T. 2013. “Moving beyond the Clash of Interests: On Stewardship Theory and the Relationships between Central Government Departments and Public Agencies.” Public Management Review 15 (4): 541–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. 2012. “Multiple-Case Study Methods in Governance Related Research.” Public Management Review 14 (1): 67–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steyvers, K., H. Reynaert, and T. Block. 2010. “Team Work or Territorial War? Assessing the Introduction of a Management Team in Local Government: The Flemish Regional of Belgium.” Public Management Review 12 (1): 11–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svara, J. 2001. “The Myth of the Dichotomy: Complementarity of Politics and Administration in the past and Future of Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 61 (2): 176–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tengblad, S. 2006. “Is There a ‘New Managerial Work’? A Comparison with Henry Mintzberg’s Classic Study 30 Years Later.” Journal of Management Studies 43 (7): 1437–1461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiernan, A. 2015. “Craft and Capacity in the Public Service.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 74 (1): 53–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toonen, T. 1990. “The Unitary State as a System of Co-Governance: The Case of the Netherlands.” Public Administration 68 (3): 281–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., B. G. Peters, J. Pierre, and E. Sorensen. 2012. Interactive Governance: Advancing the Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Steen, M., R. Peeters, M. Van Twist, and M. Schulz. 2012. Bestuursondersteuning. Tussen Voorhoede En Achtervang. The Hague: NSOB [Dutch].
   Google Scholar
• Van Hulst, M., L. de Graaf, and G. van den Brink. 2012. “The Work of Exemplary Practitioners in Neighbourhood Governance.” Critical Policy Studies 6 (4): 434–451.
   Google Scholar
• Van Maanen, J. 2011. Tales of the Field. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, T. 2011. “Ethnography, Reality, and Truth: The Vital Need for Studies of ‘How Things Work’ in Organizations and Management.” Journal of Management Studies 48 (1): 202–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson Jr., R. 2016. Rethinking Public Administration: The Case for Management. 2nd ed. Irvine, CA: Melvin & Leigh Publishers.
   Google Scholar