Obstacles and solutions on the ladder of citizen participation: a systematic review

References

• *Abelson, J., P.-G. Forest, J. Eyles, P. Smith, E. Martin, and F. P. Gauvin. 2003. “Deliberations about Deliberative Methods: Issues in the Design and Evaluation of Public Participation Processes.” Social Science & Medicine 57 (2): 239–251. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00343-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Agranoff, R. 2006. “Inside Collaborative Networks: Ten Lessons for Public Managers.” Public Administration Review 66 (S1): 56–65. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00666.x.
   Google Scholar
• Arksey, H., and L. O’Malley. 2005. “Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8 (1): 19–32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616.
   Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. 1969. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Planning Association 35 (4): 216–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Barnes, M., J. Newman, A. Knops, and H. Sullivan. 2003. “Constituting ‘The Public’ in Public Participation.” Public Administration 81 (2): 379–399. doi:10.1111/padm.2003.81.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beierle, T. C. 1999. “Using Social Goals to Evaluate Public Participation in Environmental Decisions.” Review of Policy Research 16 (3–4): 75–103. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.1999.tb00879.x.
   Google Scholar
• Berner, M., J. Amos, and R. Morse. 2011. “What Constitutes Effective Citizen Participation in Local Government? Views from City Stakeholders.” Public Administration Quarterly 35 (1): 128–163.
   Google Scholar
• *Boxelaar, L., M. Paine, and R. Beilin. 2006. “Community Engagement and Public Administration: Of Silos, Overlays and Technologies of Government.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 65 (1): 113–126. doi:10.1111/ajpa.2006.65.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Buckwalter, N. D. 2014. “The Potential for Public Empowerment through Government-Organized Participation.” Public Administration Review 74 (5): 573–584. doi:10.1111/puar.2014.74.issue-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, P. 2009. “Conceptual, Theoretical and Practical Issues in Measuring the Benefits of Public Participation.” Evaluation 15 (3): 263–284. doi:10.1177/1356389009105881.
   Google Scholar
• *Busenberg, G. J. 2007. “Citizen Participation and Collaborative Environmental Management in the Marine Oil Trade of Coastal Alaska.” Coastal Management 35 (2–3): 239–253. doi:10.1080/08920750601042310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bussu, S., and K. P. R. Bartels. 2014. “Facilitative Leadership and the Challenge of Renewing Local Democracy in Italy.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38 (6): 2256–2273. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Callanan, M. 2005. “Institutionalizing Participation and Governance? New Participative Structures in Local Government in Ireland.” Public Administration 83 (4): 909–929. doi:10.1111/padm.2005.83.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Campbell, D. 2010. “Democratic Norms to Deliberative Forms: Managing Tools and Tradeoffs in Community-Based Civic Engagement.” Public Administration & Management 15 (1): 305–341.
   Google Scholar
• Chess, C. 2000. “Evaluating Environmental Public Participation: Methodological Questions.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 43 (6): 769–784. doi:10.1080/09640560020001674.
   Google Scholar
• *Cheyne, C., and M. Comrie. 2002. “Enhanced Legitimacy for Local Authority Decision Making: Challenges, Setbacks and Innovation.” Policy & Politics 30 (4): 469–482. doi:10.1332/030557302760590404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coglianese, C. 2002. “Is Satisfaction Success? Evaluating Public Participation in Regulatory Policymaking.” Cambridge, MA: KSG Working Paper No. RWP02-038. https://research.hks.harvard.edu/publications/getFile.aspx?Id=53 doi:10.2139/ssrn.331420.
   Google Scholar
• *Collins, K., and R. Ison. 2009. “Jumping off Arnstein’s Ladder: Social Learning as a New Policy Paradigm for Climate Change Adaptation.” Environmental Policy and Governance 19 (6): 358–373. doi:10.1002/eet.v19:6.
   Google Scholar
• Collinson, S., and A. M. Rugman. 2010. “Case Selection Bias in Management Research: The Implications for International Business Studies.” European Journal of International Management 4 (5): 441–463. doi:10.1504/EJIM.2010.034961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Cooper, T. L., T. A. Bryer, and J. W. Meek. 2006. “Citizen-Centered Collaborative Public Management.” Public Administration Review 66 (S1): 76–88. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00668.x.
   Google Scholar
• Cruzes, D. S., and T. Dybå. 2011. “Research Synthesis in Software Engineering: A Tertiary Study.” Information and Software Technology 53 (5): 440–455. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2011.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Davies, J. S. 2009. “The Limits of Joined-Up Government: Towards a Political Analysis.” Public Administration 87 (1): 80–96. doi:10.1111/padm.2009.87.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delli Carpini, M. X., F. L. Cook, and L. R. Jacobs. 2004. “Public Deliberations, Discursive Participation and Citizen Engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature.” Annual Review of Political Science 7 (1): 315–344. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devins, D., B. Mitchell, and P. Willis. 2014. “Literature Review.” Small and Medium Enterprise: Deliberative Engagement, Leeds: Leeds Beckett University. http://smedenet.eu/library/read?articleid=14
   Google Scholar
• *Donnelly, P. G., and T. J. Majka. 1998. “Residents’ Efforts at Neighborhood Stabilization: Facing the Challenges of Inner City Neighborhoods.” Sociological Forum 13 (2): 189–213. doi:10.1023/A:1022192431879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Edelenbos, J. 1999. “Design and Management of Participatory Public Policy Making.” Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory 1 (4): 569–576. doi:10.1080/14719039900000027.
   Google Scholar
• *Edelenbos, J., and E.-H. Klijn. 2005. “Managing Stakeholder Involvement in Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Six Interactive Processes in the Netherlands.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16 (3): 417–466. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. 1991. “Better Stories and Better Constructs: The Case for Rigor and Comparative Logic.” Academy of Management Review 16 (3): 620–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazi, E., and J. Smith. 2006. Civil Dialogue: Making It Work Better. Brussels: Civil Society Contact Group. http://act4europe.horus.be/module/FileLib/Civil%20dialogue,%20making%20it%20work%20better.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fedele, P., L. Brusati, and M. Ianniello. 2016. “Organizational Underpinnings of Interactive Decision Making: An Empirical Inquiry.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 29 (4): 310–326. doi:10.1108/IJPSM-08-2015-0155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Foster-Fishman, P. G., C. Collins, and S. J. Pierce. 2013. “An Investigation of the Dynamic Processes Promoting Citizen Participation.” American Journal of Community Psychology 51: 492–509. doi:10.1007/s10464-012-9566-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *French, S., and S. Bayley. 2011. “Public Participation: Comparing Approaches.” Journal of Risk Research 14 (2): 241–257. doi:10.1080/13669877.2010.515316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Fung, A. 2006. “Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance.” Public Administration Review 66 (S1): 66–75. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667.x.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A., and E. O. Wright. 2001. “Deepening Democracy: Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance.” Politics & Society 29 (1): 5–41. doi:10.1177/0032329201029001002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garau, C. 2012. “Citizen Participation in Public Planning: A Literature Review.” International Journal of Sciences 1 (12): 21–44.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbert, M., and W. Ruigrok. 2010. “The ‘What’ and ‘How’ of Case Study Rigor: Three Strategies Based on Published Work.” Organizational Research Methods 13 (4): 710–737. doi:10.1177/1094428109351319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbert, M., W. Ruigrok, and B. Wicki. 2008. “What Passes as a Rigorous Case Study?” Strategic Management Journal 29 (13): 1465–1474. doi:10.1002/smj.v29:13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Guertz, C., and T. van de Wijdeven. 2010. “Making Citizen Participation Work: The Challenging Search for New Forms of Local Democracy in the Netherlands.” Local Government Studies 36 (4): 531–549. doi:10.1080/03003930.2010.494110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Gusmano, M. K. 2013. “FDA Decisions and Public Deliberation: Challenges and Opportunities.” Public Administration Review 73 (S1): S115–S126. doi:10.1111/puar.2013.73.issue-s1.
   Google Scholar
• *Halvorsen, K. E. 2003. “Assessing the Effects of Public Participation.” Public Administration Review 63 (5): 535–543. doi:10.1111/puar.2003.63.issue-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoon, C. 2013. “Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Case Studies: An Approach to Theory Building.” Organizational Research Methods 16 (4): 522–556. doi:10.1177/1094428113484969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Huitema, D., M. van de Kerkhof, and U. Pesch. 2007. “The Nature of the Beast: Are Citizens’ Juries Deliberative or Pluralist?” Policy Sciences 40 (4): 287–311. doi:10.1007/s11077-007-9046-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ianniello, M., P. Fedele, and L. Brusati. 2012. “Stakeholders’ Inclusion: Measuring the Performance of Interactive Decision Making.” In Reforming the Public Sector: How to Make the Difference, edited by G. Tria and G. Valotti, 260–284. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Involve. 2005. The True Costs of Public Participation. London: Involve. http://www.involve.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/True-Costs-Full-Report2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• *Irvin, R. A., and J. Stansbury. 2004. “Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the Effort?” Public Administration Review 64 (1): 55–65. doi:10.1111/puar.2004.64.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Juarez, J. A., and K. D. Brown. 2008. “Extracting or Empowering? A Critique of Participatory Methods for Marginalized Populations.” Landscape Journal 27 (2): 190–204. doi:10.3368/lj.27.2.190.
   Google Scholar
• *Kasymova, J. T., and H. L. Schachter. 2014. “Bringing Participatory Tools to a Different Level.” Public Performance & Management Review 37 (3): 441–464. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576370305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kearns, A. 1995. “Active Citizenship and Local Governance: Political and Geographical Dimensions.” Political Geography 14 (2): 155–175. doi:10.1016/0962-6298(95)91662-N.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenney, D. S. 2000. Arguing about Consensus: Examining the Case against Western Watershed Initiatives and Other Collaborative Groups Active in Natural Resources Management. Boulder, CO: Natural Resources Law Center, University of Colorado School of Law.
   Google Scholar
• Kickert, W. J., E.-H. Klijn, and J. F. Koppenjan. 1997. Managing Complex Networks. Strategies for the Public Sector. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• *Kim, S., and H. L. Schachter. 2013. “Citizen Participation in the Budget Process and Local Government Accountability.” Public Performance and Management Review 36 (3): 456–471. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576360304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E.-H. 2008. “Governance and Governance Networks in Europe.” Public Management Review 10 (4): 505–525. doi:10.1080/14719030802263954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppenjan, J. F. 2008. “Creating a Playing Field for Assessing the Effectiveness of Network Collaboration by Performance Measures.” Public Management Review 10 (6): 699–714. doi:10.1080/14719030802423061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Landry, J., and L. Angeles. 2011. “Institutionalizing Participation in Municipal Policy Development: Preliminary Lessons from a Start-Up Process in Plateau-Mont-Royal.” Canadian Journal of Urban Research 20 (1): 105–131.
   Google Scholar
• *Leach, W. D. 2006. “Collaborative Public Management and Democracy: Evidence from Western Watershed Partnerships.” Public Administration Review 66 (S1): 100–110. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00670.x.
   Google Scholar
• *Leighninger, M. 2007. “Is Everything up to Date in Kansas City? Why ‘Citizen Involvement’ May Soon Be Obsolete.” National Civic Review 96 (2): 12–27. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1542-7811.
   Google Scholar
• Liberati, A., D. Altman, J. Tetzlaff, C. Mulrow, P. C. Gøtzsche, J. Loannidis, and D. Moher. 2009. “The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies that Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration.” Annals of Internal Medicine 151 (4): W-65–W-94. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lowndes, V., P. Lawrence, and S. Gerry. 2006. “Diagnosing and Remedying the Failings of Official Participation Schemes: The CLEAR Framework.” Social Policy and Society 5 (2): 281–891. doi:10.1017/S1474746405002988.
   Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. 2005. “Clarity Bordering on Stupidity: Where’s the Quality in Systematic Review?” Journal of Education Policy 20 (4): 393–416. doi:10.1080/02680930500131801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *McGuire, M. 2006. “Collaborative Public Management: Assessing What We Know and How We Know It.” Public Administration Review 66 (S1): 33–43. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00664.x.
   Google Scholar
• McLaverty, P., ed. 2002. Public Participation and Innovations in Community Governance. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• *Michels, A., and L. De Graaf. 2010. “Examining Citizen Participation: Local Participatory Policy Making and Democracy.” Local Government Studies 36 (4): 477–491. doi:10.1080/03003930.2010.494101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe, T. M. 1990. “The Politics of Structural Choice: Toward a Theory of Public Bureaucracy.” In Organization Theory: From Chester Barnard to the Present and Beyond, edited by O. E. Williamson, 116–153. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moher, D., A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, and D. G. Altman. 2009. “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement.” Annals of Internal Medicine 151 (4): 264–269. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) 2001. Citizens as Partners. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Painter, M., and B. G. Peters. 2010. “Administrative Traditions in Comparative Perspective: Families, Groups and Hybrids.” In Tradition and Public Administration, edited by M. Painter and B. G. Peters, 19–30. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Panic, N., E. Leoncini, G. de Belvis, W. Ricciardi, and S. Boccia. 2013. “Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.” PLoS ONE 8 (12): e83138. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petts, J., and B. Leach. 2000. Evaluating Methods for Public Participation: A Literature Review. Bristol: Environmental Agency. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/290295/stre135-e-e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• *Pozzebon, M., and C. Mailhot. 2012. “Citizens Engaged to Improve the Sustainability and Quality of Life of Their Cities: The Case of Nossa Sao Paulo.” Journal of Change Management 12 (3): 301–321. doi:10.1080/14697017.2012.673072.
   Google Scholar
• *Raco, M. 2000. “Assessing Community Participation in Local Economic Development: Lessons for the New Urban Policy.” Political Geography 19 (5): 573–599. doi:10.1016/S0962-6298(00)00004-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich, R. C., and W. A. Rosenbaum. 1981. “Introduction.” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 17 (4): 439–445. doi:10.1177/002188638101700403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riedel, J. A. 1972. “Citizen Participation: Myths and Realities.” Public Administration Review 32 (3): 210–220. doi:10.2307/975275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., and L. J. Frewer. 2000. “Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation.” Science, Technology and Human Values 25 (1): 3–29. doi:10.1177/016224390002500101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., and L. J. Frewer. 2005. “A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms.” Science, Technology and Human Values 30 (2): 251–290. doi:10.1177/0162243904271724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., T. E. Horlick-Jones, J. Walls, W. Poortinga, and N. F. Pidgeon. 2008. “Analysis of a Normative Framework for Evaluating Public Engagement Exercises: Reliability, Validity and Limitations.” Public Understanding of Science 17 (4): 419–441. doi:10.1177/0963662506075351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryfe, D. M. 2005. “Does Deliberative Democracy Work?” Annual Review of Political Science 8 (1): 49–71. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.032904.154633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Sanderson, I. 1999. “Participation and Democratic Renewal: From ‘Instrumental’ to ‘Communicative Rationality’?” Policy & Politics 27 (3): 325–341. doi:10.1332/030557399782453145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, S. M. 2013. “Commentary: In Search of the Secret Public Participation Recipe.” Public Administration Review 73 (1): 34–35. doi:10.1111/puar.2013.73.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Sheikh, K., and S. Rao. 2007. “Participatory City Planning in Chhattisgarh: A Civil Society Initiative.” Environment & Urbanization 19 (2): 563–581. doi:10.1177/0956247807082837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Simrell King, C., K. M. Feltey, and B. O’Neill Susel. 1998. “The Question of Participation: Toward Authentic Public Participation in Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 58 (4): 317–326. doi:10.2307/977561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Skotnitsky, L., and E. Ferguson. 2005. “Building Community Capacity with Non-Profit Boards in the Inner City.” Canadian Journal of Urban Research 14 (1): 32–53.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. 2012. “Multiple-Case Study Methods in Governance-Related Research.” Public Management Review 14 (1): 67–82. doi:10.1080/14719037.2011.589618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Stout, M. 2010. “Climbing the Ladder of Participation: Establishing Local Policies for Participatory Practice.” Public Administration & Management 15 (1): 46–97.
   Google Scholar
• *Sun, M. T.-W., Y.-T. Tsai, M.-C. Shih, and J. Y.-W. Lin. 2009. “Public Participation and the Concept of Space in Environmental Governance: An Application of PPGIS.” Public Administration and Development 29 (3): 250–261. doi:10.1002/pad.527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surowiecki, J. 2005. The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many are Smarter than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies, and Nations. New York: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• *Thomson, A. M., and J. L. Perry. 2006. “Collaboration Processes: Inside the Black Box.” Public Administration Review 66 (S1): 20–32. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x.
   Google Scholar
• *Tijūnaitienė, R., B. Neverauskas, and S. Balčiūnas. 2009. “Motivation Expression of Citizen Participation in Organisations of Citizen Society.” Inzinerine Ekonomika - Engineering Economics 61 (1): 65–74.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., B. G. Peters, J. Pierre, and E. Sørensen. 2012. Interactive Governance: Advancing the Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tranfield, D., D. Denyer, and P. Smart. 2003. “Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review.” British Journal of Management 14 (3): 207–222. doi:10.1111/bjom.2003.14.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Van Bueren, E. M., E.-H. Klijn, and J. F. Koppenjan. 2003. “Dealing with Wicked Problems in Networks: Analyzing an Environmental Debate from a Network Perspective.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13 (2): 193–212. doi:10.1093/jopart/mug017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Van Damme, J., and M. Brans. 2012. “Managing Public Consultation: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Findings from Belgian Case Studies.” Public Administration 90 (4): 1047–1066. doi:10.1111/padm.2012.90.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Van Tatenhove, J., J. Edelenbos, and P.-J. Klok. 2010. “Power and Interactive Policy-Making: A Comparative Study of Power and Influence in Eight Interactive Projects in the Netherlands.” Public Administration 88 (3): 609–626. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01829.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorberg, W., V. J. J. M. Bekkers, and L. G. Tummers. 2015. “A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the Social Innovation Journey.” Public Management Review 17 (9): 1333–1357. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.930505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ward, P. 2010. “Participatory Development in Jamaica: Does It Work in Practice?” Social and Economic Studies 59 (4): 167–196.
   Google Scholar
• *Yang, K., and S. K. Pandey. 2011. “Further Dissecting the Black Box of Citizen Participation: When Does Citizen Involvement Lead to Good Outcomes?” Public Administration Review 71 (6): 880–892. doi:10.1111/puar.2011.71.issue-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Zhang, Y., and Y. Liao. 2011. “Participatory Budgeting in Local Government: Evidence from New Jersey Municipalities.” Public Performance & Management Review 35 (2): 281–302. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576350203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar