Public values: citizens’ perspective

References

• Ajzen, I. 2005. Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. London: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., and M. Fishbein. 1977. “Attitude-Behavior Relations: A Theoretical Analysis and Review of Empirical Research.” Psychological Bulletin 84 (5): 888. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, L. B., T. B. Jørgensen, A. M. Kjeldsen, L. H. Pedersen, and K. Vrangbæk. 2012. “Public Value Dimensions: Developing and Testing a Multi-Dimensional Classification.” International Journal of Public Administration 35 (11): 715–728. doi:10.1080/01900692.2012.670843.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. 1995. Value in Ethics and Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. 2000. “Beyond Homo Economicus: New Developments in Theories of Social Norms.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 29 (2): 170–200. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2000.00170.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. J. 2012. Social Choice and Individual Values. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bannister, F., and R. Connolly. 2014. “ICT, Public Values and Transformative Government: A Framework and Programme for Research.” Government Information Quarterly 31 (1): 119–128. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barger, P. B., and E. F. Sinar 2011. “Psychological Data from Amazon. Com’s MTurk: Rapid and inexpensive—But High-Quality.” Presented at the 26th Annual Conference for the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, T. D., E. Beaulieu, and G. W. Saxton. 2018. “Restoring Trust in the Police: Why Female Officers Reduce Suspicions of Corruption.” Governance 31 (1): 143–161. doi:10.1111/gove.2018.31.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastos, M., and D. Mercea. 2018. “Parametrizing Brexit: Mapping Twitter Political Space to Parliamentary Constituencies.” Information, Communication & Society, 21 (7): 921–939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berinsky, A. J., G. A. Huber, and G. S. Lenz. 2012. “Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.Com’s Mechanical Turk.” Political Analysis 20 (3): 351–368. doi:10.1093/pan/mpr057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. 2002. “Public‐Value Failure: When Efficient Markets May Not Do.” Public Administration Review 62 (2): 145–161. doi:10.1111/puar.2002.62.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. 2007. Public Values and Public Interest: Counterbalancing Economic Individualism. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. and J. Johnson. 2015. “The Political Economy of Public Values: A Case for The Public Sphere and Progressive Opportunity.” The American Review of Public Administration 45 (1): 61–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brawley, A. M., and C. L. Pury. 2016. “Work Experiences on MTurk: Job Satisfaction, Turnover, and Information Sharing.” Computers in Human Behavior 54: 531–546. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J., A. Sancino, J. Benington, and E. Sørensen. 2017. “Towards a Multi-Actor Theory of Public Value Co-Creation.” Public Management Review 19 (5): 640–654. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1192164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., B. C. Crosby, and L. Bloomberg. 2014. “Public Value Governance: Moving beyond Traditional Public Administration and the New Public Management.” Public Administration Review 74 (4): 445–456. doi:10.1111/puar.12238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buettner, R. 2015, January. “A Systematic Literature Review of Crowdsourcing Research from A Human Resource Management Perspective.” In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2015), 4609–4618. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M., T. Kwang, and S. D. Gosling. 2011a. “Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, yet High-Quality, Data?” Perspectives on Psychological Science 6 (1): 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M., T. Kwang, and S. D. Gosling. 2011b. “Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, yet High-Quality, Data?” Perspectives on Psychological Science 6 (1): 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., and D. W. Fiske. 1959. “Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix.” Psychological Bulletin 56 (2): 81. doi:10.1037/h0046016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpini, M. X. D., F. L. Cook, and L. R. Jacobs. 2004. “Public Deliberation, Discursive Participation, and Citizen Engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature.” Annual Review of Political Science 7: 315–344. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassinelli, C. W. 1962. “The Public Interest in Political Ethics.” The Public Interest 24: 44–53.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, J., P. Mueller, and G. Paolacci. 2013. “Nonnaïvete among Amazon Mechanical Turk Workers: Consequences and Solutions for Behavioral Researchers.” Behavior Research Methods 46 (1): 112–130. doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0365-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, R. C. 1983. “The Problem of Moral Reasoning in American Public Administration: The Case for a Code of Ethics.” Public Administration Review 43 (1): 32–39.
   Google Scholar
• Charles, M. B., W. Martin de Jong, and N. Ryan. 2011. “Public Values in Western Europe: A Temporal Perspective.” The American Review of Public Administration 41 (1): 75–91. doi:10.1177/0275074010361529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, J. H., D. K. Burns, R. Sinclair, and M. Sliter. 2017. “Amazon Mechanical Turk in Organizational Psychology: An Evaluation and Practical Recommendations.” Journal of Business and Psychology 32 (4): 347–361. doi:10.1007/s10869-016-9458-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christenson, D. P., and D. M. Glick. 2013. “Crowdsourcing Panel Studies and Real-Time Experiments in MTurk.” The Political Methodologist 20 (2): 27–32.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, T. L. 1987. “Hierarchy, Virtue, and the Practice of Public Administration: A Perspective for Normative Ethics.” Public Administration Review 47: 320–328. doi:10.2307/975312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. T., and E. Xhambazi. 2015. “Predicting Political Biases against the Occupy Wall Street and Tea Party Movements.” Political Psychology 36 (1): 111–121. doi:10.1111/pops.v36.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby, B. C., and J. M. Bryson. 2017. “Why Leadership of Public Leadership Research Matters: And What to Do about It.” Public Management Review 20 (9): 1265–1286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, D. L. 1991. “Who are to Be the Electors? A Reflection on the History of Voter Registration in the United States.” Yale Law & Policy Review 9 (2): 370–404.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, W. A., K. J. Preacher, and M. R. Banaji. 2001. “Implicit Attitude Measures: Consistency, Stability, and Convergent Validity.” Psychological Science 12 (2): 163–170. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J. 2008. “Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation.” Political Studies 56 (1): 76–98. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00718.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, P., and K. West. 2009. “What Do Public Values Mean for Public Action? Putting Public Values in Their Plural Place.” The American Review of Public Administration 39 (6): 602–618. doi:10.1177/0275074008328499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, M. 2017. “Political Acclamation, Social Media and the Public Mood.” European Journal of Social Theory 20 (3): 417–434. doi:10.1177/1368431016645589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietrich, F., and C. List. 2017. “What Matters and How It Matters: A Choice-Theoretic Representation of Moral Theories.” Philosophical Review 126: 421–479. doi:10.1215/00318108-4173412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, C. M., and A. Wichowsky. 2013. “Does It Matter Who’s behind the Curtain? Anonymity in Political Advertising and the Effects of Campaign Finance Disclosure.” American Politics Research 41 (6): 965–996. doi:10.1177/1532673X13480828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederickson, H. G., K. B. Smith, C. W. Larimer, and M. J. Licari. 2015. The Public Administration Theory Primer. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fukumoto, E., and B. Bozeman. Forthcoming. “Public Values Theory: What Is Missing.” American Review of Public Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A. 2015. “Putting the Public Back into Governance: The Challenges of Citizen Participation and Its Future.” Public Administration Review 75 (4): 513–522. doi:10.1111/puar.12361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, J., J. Alford, O. Hughes, and S. Yates. 2015. “Public Value and Political Astuteness in the Work of Public Managers: The Art of the Possible.” Public Administration 93 (1): 195–211. doi:10.1111/padm.2015.93.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser, D. J., and N. Schwarz. 2016. “Attentive Turkers: MTurk Participants Perform Better on Online Attention Checks than Do Subject Pool Participants.” Behavior Research Methods 48 (1): 400–407. doi:10.3758/s13428-015-0578-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring, P. 1936. Public Administration and the Public Interest. New York: John Wiley Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Highton, B. 2004. “Voter Registration and Turnout in the United States.” Perspectives on Politics 2 (3): 507–515. doi:10.1017/S1537592704040307.
   Google Scholar
• Huff, C., and D. Tingley. 2015. “Who are These People?” Evaluating the Demographic Characteristics and Political Preferences of MTurk Survey Respondents.” Research & Politics 2 (3): 1–12. doi:10.1177/2053168015604648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jilke, S. G. Van Ryzin, and S. Van de Walle. 2016. “Responses to Decline in Marketized Public Services: An Experimental Evaluation of Choice Overload.” Journal Of Public Administration Research and Theory 26 (3): 421–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, T. B., and B. Bozeman. 2007. “Public Values: An Inventory.” Administration & Society 39 (3): 354–381. doi:10.1177/0095399707300703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, T. B., and M. R. Rutgers. 2015. “Public Values: Core or Confusion? Introduction to the Centrality and Puzzlement of Public Values Research.” The American Review of Public Administration 45 (1): 3–12. doi:10.1177/0275074014545781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, J., B. Bozeman, and M. Gaughan. Forthcoming. “Fear in Bureaucracy: Comparing Public and Private Sector Workers’ Expectations of Punishment.” Administration & Society.
   Google Scholar
• Kan, I. P., and A. B. Drummey. 2018. “Do Imposters Threaten Data Quality? an Examination of Worker Misrepresentation and Downstream Consequences in Amazon’s Mechanical Turk Workforce.” Computers in Human Behavior 83: 243–253. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, N., T. Schulze, and D. Veit. 2011. “More than Fun and Money. Worker Motivation in Crowdsourcing - A Study on Mechanical Turk.” Paper presented at the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Detroit, Michigan, August 4–7.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, W., G. Taggart, and B. Bozeman. 2018. “Administrative Delay, Red Tape and Organizational Performance.” Public Performance & Management Review.
   Google Scholar
• Landers, R. N., and T. S. Behrend. 2015. “An Inconvenient Truth: Arbitrary Distinctions between Organizational, Mechanical Turk, and Other Convenience Samples.” Industrial and Organizational Psychology 8 (2): 142–164. doi:10.1017/iop.2015.13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, G. J., and T. C. Bates. 2011. “From Left to Right: How the Personality System Allows Basic Traits to Influence Politics via Characteristic Moral Adaptations.” British Journal of Psychology 102 (3): 546–558. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02016.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leys, W. A. 1958. “4. Philosophy and the Public Interest.” Political Research, Organization and Design 2 (1): 12–13. doi:10.1177/000276425800200104.
   Google Scholar
• Lippmann, W. 1955. Essays in the Public Philosophy. Boston, MA: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Little, G., L. B. Chilton, M. Goldman, and R. C. Miller. 2009. “Turkit: Tools for Iterative Tasks on Mechanical Turk.” In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Human Computation, 29–30. San Francisco, CA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Maio, G., and G. Haddock. 2014. The Psychology of Attitudes and Attitude Change. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Maio, G. R., and J. M. Olson. 1995. “Relations between Values, Attitudes, and Behavioral Intentions: The Moderating Role of Attitude Function.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 31 (3): 266–285. doi:10.1006/jesp.1995.1013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marvel, J. D. 2014. “The Boston Marathon Bombings: Who’s to Blame and Why It Matters for Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 74 (6): 713–725. doi:10.1111/puar.12263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marvel, J. D., and A. M. Girth. 2016. “Citizen Attributions of Blame in Third Party Governance.” Public Administration Review 76 (1): 96–108. doi:10.1111/puar.12474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy, J., T. Rahman, and M. Somer. 2018. “Polarization and the Global Crisis of Democracy: Common Patterns, Dynamics, and Pernicious Consequences for Democratic Polities.” American Behavioral Scientist 62 (1): 16–42. doi:10.1177/0002764218759576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, J. S., S. K. O’Neill, P. Hartman, and A. Lorys. 2018. “Amazon’s Mechanical Turk as a Viable Source for Organizational and Occupational Health Research.” Occupational Health Science 2 (1): 83–98. doi:10.1007/s41542-017-0009-x.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. M., K. L. Saunders, and C. E. Farhart. 2016. “Conspiracy Endorsement as Motivated Reasoning: The Moderating Roles of Political Knowledge and Trust.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (4): 824–844. doi:10.1111/ajps.12234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moneypenny, P. 1953. “A Code of Ethics as A Means of Controlling Administrative Conduct.” Public Administration Review 15 (3): 185–187.
   Google Scholar
• Mortensen, K., and T. L. Hughes. 2018. “Comparing Amazon’s Mechanical Turk Platform to Conventional Data Collection Methods in the Health and Medical Research Literature.” Journal of General Internal Medicine 33 (4): 533–538. doi:10.1007/s11606-018-4563-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulton, S. 2012. “The Authority to Do Good: Publicly Responsible Behavior among Private Mortgage Lenders.” Public Administration Review 72 (3): 430–439. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02546.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulton, S., and A. Eckerd. 2012. “Preserving the Publicness of the Nonprofit Sector: Resources, Roles, and Public Values.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 41 (4): 656–685. doi:10.1177/0899764011419517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T. 2012. “Putting the “Public” Back in Public Values Research: Designing Participation to Identify and Respond to Values.” Public Administration Review 72 (5): 699–708. doi:10.1111/puar.2012.72.issue-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Necka, E. A., S. Cacioppo, G. J. Norman, and J. T. Cacioppo. 2016. “Measuring the Prevalence of Problematic Behaviors among MTurk, Campus, and Community Participants.” PloS ONE 11 (6): 1–19. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, B. I., and R. Y. Shapiro. 2010. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paolacci, G., and J. Chandler. 2014. “Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a Participant Pool.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 23 (3): 184–188. doi:10.1177/0963721414531598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, M. A., and B. Bozeman. 2018. “Social Media as a Public Values Sphere.” Public Integrity 20 (4): 386–400. doi:10.1080/10999922.2017.1420351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, M. J., and J. M. Stritch. 2018. “Internal Management and Perceived Managerial Trustworthiness: Evidence from a Survey Experiment.” The American Review of Public Administration 48 (1): 67–81. doi:10.1177/0275074016657179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, M. J., J. M. Stritch, and G. Taggart. 2017. “Citizen Perceptions of Procedural Fairness and the Moderating Roles of ‘Belief in a Just World’and ‘Public Service Motivation’in Public Hiring.” Public Administration 95 (4): 874–894. doi:10.1111/padm.12353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piazza, J., and P. Sousa. 2014. “Religiosity, Political Orientation, and Consequentialist Moral Thinking.” Social Psychological and Personality Science 5 (3): 334–342. doi:10.1177/1948550613492826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portmore, D. W. 2007. “Consequentializing Moral Theories.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (1): 39–73. doi:10.1111/papq.2007.88.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prothro, J. W., and C. M. Grigg. 1960. “Fundamental Principles of Democracy: Bases of Agreement and Disagreement.” The Journal of Politics 22 (2): 276–294. doi:10.2307/2127359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resh, W. G., J. D. Marvel, and B. Wen. 2018. “The Persistence of Prosocial Work Effort as a Function of Mission Match.” Public Administration Review 78 (1): 116–125. doi:10.1111/puar.12882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynaers, A. M. 2014. “Public Values in Public–Private Partnerships.” Public Administration Review 74 (1): 41–50. doi:10.1111/puar.12137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokeach, M. 1973. The Nature of Human Values. Glencoe, IL: Free press.
   Google Scholar
• Rutgers, M. R. 2015. “As Good as It Gets? on the Meaning of Public Value in the Study of Policy and Management.” The American Review of Public Administration 45 (1): 29–45. doi:10.1177/0275074014525833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert, G. A. 1960. The Public Interest: A Critique of The Theory of a Political Concept. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sorauf, F. J. 1957. “The Public Interest Reconsidered.” The Journal of Politics 19 (4): 616–639. doi:10.2307/2126954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stritch, J. M., M. J. Pedersen, and G. Taggart. 2017. “The Opportunities and Limitations of Using Mechanical Turk (Mturk) in Public Administration and Management Scholarship.” International Public Management Journal 20 (3): 489–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torelli, C. J., and A. M. Kaikati. 2009. “Values as Predictors of Judgments and Behaviors: The Role of Abstract and Concrete Mindsets.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96 (1): 231. doi:10.1037/a0013836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallentyne, P. 1988. “Teleology, Consequentialism, and the Past.” The Journal of Value Inquiry 22 (2): 89–101. doi:10.1007/BF00135455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Wal, Z., G. De Graaf, and K. Lasthuizen. 2008. “What’s Valued Most? Similarities and Differences between the Organizational Values of the Public and Private Sector.” Public Administration 86 (2): 465–482. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00719.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Wal, Z., T. Nabatchi, and G. De Graaf. 2015. “From Galaxies to Universe: A Cross-Disciplinary Review and Analysis of Public Values Publications from 1969 to 2012.” The American Review of Public Administration 45 (1): 13–28. doi:10.1177/0275074013488822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigoda, E. 2002. “From Responsiveness to Collaboration: Governance, Citizens, and the Next Generation of Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 62 (5): 527–540. doi:10.1111/puar.2002.62.issue-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrangbaek, K. 2009. “Public Sector Values in Denmark: A Survey Analysis.” International Journal of Public Administration 32 (6): 508–535. doi:10.1080/01900690902861704.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, B., and T. Christensen. 2017. “The Open Public Value Account and Comprehensive Social Development: An Assessment of China and the United States.” Administration & Society 49 (6): 852–881. doi:10.1177/0095399715587522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, I., and H. Shearer. 2011. “Appraising Public Value: Past, Present and Futures.” Public Administration 89 (4): 1367–1384. doi:10.1111/padm.2011.89.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witesman, E., and L. Walters. 2014. “Public Service Values: A New Approach to the Study of Motivation in the Public Sphere.” Public Administration 92 (2): 375–405. doi:10.1111/padm.2014.92.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K. 2005. “Public Administrators’ Trust in Citizens: A Missing Link in Citizen Involvement Efforts.” Public Administration Review 65 (3): 273–285. doi:10.1111/puar.2005.65.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zukin, C., S. Keeter, M. Andolina, K. Jenkins, and M. X. D. Carpini. 2006. A New Engagement?: Political Participation, Civic Life, and the Changing American Citizen. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar