Network management as a contingent activity. A configurational analysis of managerial behaviors in different network settings

References

• Agranoff, R., and M. McGuire. 2001. “American Federalism and the Search for Models of Management.” Public Administration Review 61 (6): 1775–1800. doi:10.1111/puar.2001.61.issue-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartelings, J. A., J. Goedee, J. Raab, and R. Bijl. 2017. “The Nature of Orchestrational Work.” Public Management Review 19 (3): 342–360. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1209233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, S. J., A. Van Witteloostuijn, and L. Eden. 2010. “From the Editors: Common Method Variance in International Business Research”. Journal of International Business Studies 41 (2): 178–184. doi:10.1057/jibs.2009.88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristofoli, D., and J. Markovic. 2016. “How To Make Public Networks Really Work: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis.” Public Administration 94 (1): 89–110. doi:10.1111/padm.2016.94.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J., A. Van Buuren, and E.-H. Klijn. 2013. “Connective Capacities of Network Managers.” Public Management Review 15 (1): 131–159. doi:10.1080/14719037.2012.691009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J., and E. Klijn. 2006. “Managing Stakeholder Involvement in Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Six Interactive Processes in the Netherlands.” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 16 (3): 417. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmenegger, P., D. Schraff, and A. Walter. 2014. “QCA, the Truth Table Analysis and Large-N Survey Data: The Benefits of Calibration and the Importance of Robustness Tests.” COMPASSS Working Paper 2014-79. http://www.compasss.org/wpseries/EmmeneggerSchraffWalter2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fiss, P. C. 2007. “A Set-Theoretic Approach to Organizational Configurations.” The Academy of Management Review 32 (4): 1180–1198. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiss, P. C. 2011. “Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research.” The Academy of Management Journal 54 (2): 393–420. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.60263120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotiadis, A., SS. Yeh, T. Cheng, and T. C. Huan. 2016. “Applying Configural Analysis to Explaining Rural-tourism Success Recipes.” Journal of Business Research 69 (4): 1479–1483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greckhamer, T., V. F. Misangyi, and P. C. Fiss. 2013. “The Two QCAs: From a Small-N to a Large-N Set Theoretic Approach.” In Configurational Theory and Methods in Organizational Research, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, edited by A. Marx, B. Cambre, and P. C. Fiss, 49–75. Bingley, UK: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, H. H. 1960. Modern Factor Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herranz, J., Jr. 2010. “Multilevel Performance Indicators for Multisectoral Networks and Management.” The American Review of Public Administration 40 (4): 445–460. doi:10.1177/0275074009341662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovik, S., and G. S. Hanssen. 2015. “The Impact of Network Management and Complexity on Multi-Level Coordination.” Public Administration 93: 506–523. doi:10.1111/padm.12135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, K., and K. G. Provan. 2007. “Structural Embeddedness and Organizational Social Outcomes in a Centrally Governed Mental Health Services Network.” Public Management Review 9 (2): 169–189. doi:10.1080/14719030701340218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxham, C., and S. Vangen. 2005. Managing to Collaborate. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, M., and R. Jensen. 2015. “Common Method Bias in Public Management Studies.” International Public Management Journal 18 (1): 3–30. doi:10.1080/10967494.2014.997906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, C., S. MacKenzie, and P. Podsakoff. 2003. “A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research.” Journal of Consumer Research 30 (2): 199–218. doi:10.1086/jcr.2003.30.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenis, P., and K. Provan. 2009. “Towards an Exogenous Theory of Public Network Performance’.” Public Administration 87 (3): 440–456. doi:10.1111/padm.2009.87.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kickert, W. J. M., E. H. Klijn, and J. F. M. Koppenjan. 1997. Managing Complex Networks. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., B. Steijn, and J. Edelenbos. 2010a. “The Impact of Network Management on Outcomes in Governance Networks.” Public Administration 88 (4): 1063–1082. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01826.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., B. Steijn, and J. Edelenbos. 2010b. “Trust in Governance Networks: Its Impacts on Outcomes.” Administration and Society 42 (2): 193–221. doi:10.1177/0095399710362716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., V. Sierra, T. Ysa, E. Berman, J. Edelenbos, and D. Y. Chen. 2016. “The Influence of Trust on Network Performance in Taiwan, Spain, and the Netherlands: A Cross-Country Comparison.” International Public Management Journal 19 (1): 111–139. doi:10.1080/10967494.2015.1115790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klir, G., U. St. Clair, and B. Yuan. 1997. Fuzzy Set Theory: Foundations and Applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Koliba, C., S. Wiltshire,S, D. Turner, A. Zia, and E. Campbell. 2017. “The Critical Role of Information Sharing to the Value Proposition of a Food Systems Network.” Public Management Review 19 (3): 284–304. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2016.1209235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppenjan, J. F. M., and E. H. Kljin. 2004. Managing Uncertainties in Networks: A Network Approach to Problem Solving and Decision Making. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kort, M., and E. Klijn. 2011. “Public-Private Partnerships in Urban Regeneration Projects: Organizational Form or Managerial Capacity?” Public Administration Review 71 (4): 618–626. doi:10.1111/puar.2011.71.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandell, M. P. 2001. Getting Results through Collaboration: Networks and Network Structures for Public Policy and Management. 1st ed. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Markovic, J. 2017. “Contingencies and Organizing Principles in Public Networks.” Public Management Review 19 (3): 361–380. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1209237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, M. 2002. “Managing Networks: Propositions on What Managers Do and Why They Do It.” Public Administration Review 62 (5): 599–609. doi:10.1111/puar.2002.62.issue-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., and L. J. O’Toole. 2001. “Managerial Strategies and Behaviour in Networks: A Model with Evidence from US Public Education.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11 (3): 271–293. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., and L. J. O’Toole. 2013. “Subjective Organizational Performance and Measurement Error: Common Source Bias and Spurious Relationships.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23 (2): 429–456. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., S. B. MacKenzie, J. Lee, and N. P. Podsakoff. 2003. “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies.” Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5): 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., S. B. MacKenzie, and N. P. Podsakoff. 2012. “Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It.” Annual Review of Psychology 63: 539–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popp, J., H. B. Milward, G. MacKean, A. Casebeer, and R. Lindstrom. 2014. Inter-Organizational Networks: A Review of the Literature to Inform Practice. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., and H. B. Milward. 1995. “A Preliminary Theory of Interorganizational Network Effectiveness: A Comparative Study of Four Community Mental Health Systems.” Administrative Science Quarterly 40 (1): 1–33. doi:10.2307/2393698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., and H. B. Milward. 2001. “Do Networks Really Work? A Framework for Evaluating Public-Sector Organizational Networks.” Public Administration Review 61 (4): 414–423. doi:10.1111/puar.2001.61.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., and J. G. Sebastian. 1998. “Networks within Networks: Service Link Overlap, Organizational Cliques and Network Effectiveness.” The Academy of Management Journal 41 (4): 453–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., K. Huang, and H. B. Milward. 2009. “The Evolution of Structural Embeddedness and Organizational Social Outcomes in a Centrally Governed Health and Human Services Network.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19: 873–893. doi:10.1093/jopart/mun036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., M. A. Veazie, L. K. Staten, and N. I. Teufel-Shone. 2005. “The Use of Network Analysis to Strengthen Community Partnerships.” Public Administration Review 65 (5): 603–613. doi:10.1111/puar.2005.65.issue-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., and P. Kenis. 2008. “Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management and Effectiveness.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (2): 229–252. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raab, J., R. S. Mannak, and B. Cambré. 2015. “Combining Structure, Governance, and Context: A Configurational Approach to Network Effectiveness.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25 (2): 479–511. doi:10.1093/jopart/mut039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. 1987. The Comparative Method. Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. 2000. Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. 2007. “Fuzzy Sets: Calibration versus Measurement.” COMPASSS Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. 2009. “Qualitative Comparative Analysis Using Fuzzy Sets (Fsqca).” In Configurational Comparative Methods. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techiniques, edited by B. Rihoux and C. C. Ragin, 87–123. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C., K. A. Drass, and S. Davey. 2006. Fuzzy Set/Qualitative Comparative Analysis 2.0 [Computer Program]. Tucson, AZ: Department of Sociology, University of Arizona.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, H. A., M. J. Simmering, and M. C. Sturman. 2009. “A Tale of Three Perspectives: Examining Post Hoc Statistical Techniques for Detection and Correction of Common Method Variance.” Organizational Research Methods 12: 762–800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rihoux, B., and C. C. Ragin. 2009. Configurational Comparative Methods. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, M. R., C. Schulze-Bentrop, and M. Paunescu. 2010. “Mapping Institutional Capital of High-Tech Firms: A Fuzzy-Set Analysis of Capitalist Variety and Export Performance.” Journal of International Business Studies 41 (2): 246–266. doi:10.1057/jibs.2009.36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreyögg, G., and J. Sydow. 2010. “CROSSROADS—Organizing for Fluidity? Dilemmas of New Organizational Forms.” Organization Science 21 (6): 1251–1262. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., and J. Torfing. 2009. “Making Governance Networks Effective And Democratic Through Metagovernance.” Public Administration 87 (2): 234–258. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01753.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steijn, B., E. H. Klijn, and J. Edelenbos. 2011. “Public-Private Partnerships: Added Value by Organizational Form or Management?” Public Administration 89 (4): 1235–1252. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01877.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tóth, Z., C. Thiesbrummel, S. C. Henneberg, and P. Naudé. 2015. “Understanding Configurations of Relational Attractiveness of the Customer Firm Using Fuzzy Set QCA.” Journal of Business Research 68 (3): 723–734. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.07.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urueña, A., and A. Hidalgo. 2016. “Successful Loyalty in E-Complaints: FsQCA and Structural Equation Modelling Analyses.” Journal of Business Research 69 (4): 1384–1389. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Raaij, D. P. A. M. 2006. “Norms Network Members Use: An Alternative Perspective for Indicating Network Success or Failure.” International Public Management Journal 9 (3): 249–270. doi:10.1080/10967490600899549.
   Google Scholar
• Verweij, S., E. H. Klijn, J. Edelenbos, and M. W. Van Buuren. 2013. “What Makes Governance Networks Work? A Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of 14 Dutch Spatial Planning Projects.” Public Administration: An International Quarterly 91 (4): 1035–1055. doi:10.1111/padm.12007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagemann, C., Q. Carsten, and C. Q. Schneider. 2007. “Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets.” COMPASSS Working Papers series. http://www.compasss.org/wpseries.htm
   Google Scholar
• Wang, W. 2016. “Exploring the Determinants of Network Effectiveness: The Case of Neighborhood Governance Networks in Beijing.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26 (2): 375–388. doi:10.1093/jopart/muv017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L. J., N. Hartman, and F. Cavazotte. 2010. “Method Variance and Marker Variables: A Review and Comprehensive CFA Marker Technique.” Organizational Research Methods 13 (3): 477–514. doi:10.1177/1094428110366036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ysa, T., V. Sierra, and M. Esteve. 2014. “Determinants of Network Outcomes: The Impact of Management Strategies.” Public Administration 92 (3): 636–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar